FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cary

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or someone you know in Cary, has suffered dog bite injuries, it’s crucial to stand up for your legal rights. Sadly, such incidents can result in severe physical and psychological trauma. Study data shows that lack of effective legal representation could diminish your chances of receiving full and fair compensation for these injuries. The experienced personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier step into this gap with their expertise in handling Dog Bite Injuries cases effectively. Our attorney team is known for our diligence, compassionate approach and tenacious pursuit of justice on behalf of the victims we represent – a reputation firmly constructed on successful case outcomes throughout Illinois including Cary . Trusting us as your choice law firm signifies uniting with a dedicated and state-esteemed professional entity advocating solely in your interest. For complex matters like dog bite injury lawsuits where significant financial compensation is typically involved – trust no one else but Carlson Bier’s deft legal aid to pursue maximum restitution possible under Illinois State Law.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cary Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise extends to diverse facets of personal injury law; one such area we specialize in is Dog Bite Injuries. As an Illinois-based legal advocate for victims of canine aggression, we have a deep understanding of the local laws surrounding these types of incidents. Mishap with aggressive animals can lead to severe trauma—both physical and emotional—and we believe those harmed deserve compensation to aid their recovery.

Dog bites often lead to more than just superficial wounds. They may result in infection, disfigurement, nerve damage or psychological trauma—all resulting from what could be a neighbor’s pet momentarily losing control. However, proving fault and liability in dog bite cases requires specific knowledge about Illinois statutes which govern dog owner responsibilities, animal control regulations, and leash laws among others. At Carlson Bier, our attorneys not only possess this expertise but also understand how to demonstrate negligence effectively on your behalf.

Key considerations in any dog bite case involve demonstrating that:

– The defendant owned or controlled the dog.

– The victim did not provoke the attack through their conduct.

– The encounter happened at a location where the victim had a legal right to be present.

We strive hard to help clients secure compensation covering all medical expenses including reconstructive surgery if needed, psychological counselling required after such traumatic events as well as lost earnings during recovery period.

Yet another crucial aspect is understanding that different states have varying rules relating to “strict liability” versus “one bite rule.” For instance, under Illinois’ strict liability law for dog bites (510 ILCS 5/16), owners are held financially responsible for any injuries caused by their pets – regardless if they knew about any prior aggression or not.

Nevertheless presenting an effective claim requires documentation and evidence gathering skill set wherein facts like police report immediately after incident has occurred or witness statements can be decisive factor winning your case against liable party – precisely where our team can support you extensively.

Real scenarios quite often extend beyond the original guidelines laid down by legislation, which subsequently caters for exceptions and exemptions. Successfully navigating these complexities requires a depth of experience and acute understanding of judicial interpretation – milestones we’ve earned repeatedly in our tenure.

Through this detailed informational guide on Dog Bite Injuries, we hope to have helped you understand the various aspects involved. But no written content can replace the value that one-to-one counsel holds when it comes to legal matters as personal as injury cases. The specifics of each case vary widely, making personalized assistance imperative. At Carlson Bier, tailoring strategies specific to your unique circumstances is part of our commitment.

Hence why we invite you now to help us understand your situation better by availing of a free case evaluation. Our experienced attorneys are here offering their expertise so that you do not bear an unfair burden due to another’s negligence or reckless actions.

Beyond just compensation recovery objectivity however remains social responsibility towards preventing such incidents recurring future through increased awareness amongst general public and stricter enforcement existing laws – aimed ensuring community stays safe its every member including pets.

Encouragingly enough, potential rectification exists within reach; all it requires is reaching out for it comprehensively leveraging existing legislative instruments designed specifically cases like yours ensure fair justice meted out perpetrators innocent victims given overdue relief deserve ought expect society at large favorably indeed.

Become proactive today, take your first step towards seeking rightful compensation for your dog bite injuries from Carlson Bier by clicking on the button below. Our team will be ready waiting assist tailored skill sets honed over years’ worth clinical professional practice – aptly equipped equip you necessary knowledge tools navigate complex legal landscape awaiting ahead with utmost confidence prowess unsurpassed across entire Illinois constituency serving utmost humility respect dignity indeed truly deserves all respects.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cary Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cary

Areas of Practice in Cary

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Wounds

Supplying specialist legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing specialist legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents receive just compensation for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Truck Accident

Ensuring expert legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Building Incidents

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Specializing in delivering expert legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Focused on assisting clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​