...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Casey

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bites injuries are more than just painful experiences, they can turn into emotional and financial burdens too. Victims of dog bite injuries in Casey, Illinois seek justice and compensation for their ordeal. To guide you through this complex legal process, trust no one other than Carlson Bier—the leading personal injury attorneys with a track record of unparalleled success in representing victims of dog bite incidents. Our expert team at Carlson Bier comprehends the intricacies involved in animal laws & local ordinances — ensuring victims obtain full-and-fair recovery for medical expenses as well as pain & suffering endured due to negligence or irresponsibility on part of the pet owner. We advocate tirelessly putting our clients’ rights at forefront while maintaining utmost empathy towards their distressing situation; earning us respect across Illinois’s legal community over decades-long practice. Remember, when grappling with aftermaths of a traumatic event like Dog Bite Injuries, top-notch representation is critical – Count on Carlson Bier! Make wise decisions today for secure tomorrow.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Casey Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our esteemed collective of legal veterans in Illinois pride themselves on their wealth of experience and knowledge concerning personal injuries such as Dog Bite Injuries. Canine encounters, while often charming, occasionally culminate in vicious attacks that leave victims with not only physical wounds but psychological scars as well.

Dog bites remain rampant injuries for both children and adults across Illinois and the country at large. These cases are unique, presenting an array of challenges largely unknown to other injury cases. First-time victims may feel daunted by the complexity involved; however, rest assured that our attorneys have triumphed repeatedly in similar conditions.

To fully comprehend the gravity of these incidents:

– The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has reported roughly 4.5 million dog bite cases annually.

– Approximately one-fifth of these biting incidences necessitate medical attention due to their severity.

– Even seemingly innocuous minor bites can lead to infections boasting lifelong repercussions if left untreated.

Delving deeper into Owing damages applicable to dog bite cases:

– Physical pain incurred from the incident

– Medical bills associated with treating related injuries or precautionary steps against infections or diseases like Rabies

– Mental anguish resulting from the traumatic experience

– Lost earnings due to time off work during recovery

Under Iowa’s strict liability law regarding dog bites, pet owners bear full responsibility for any harm caused by their dogs unless it was provoked– a standard our capable attorneys will argue effectively in court. Furthermore, Chicago’s leash laws often act as another leveraging point for victims seeking compensation since they hold owners responsible when their pets aren’t suitably restrained. As expert navigators of varying jurisdictions within Illinois legal topography, we ensure suitable compensation.

Having meticulously dissected each aspect tackling Dog Bite Injuries settlement—ranging from identifying liable parties through police reports or witnesses; building potent arguments surrounding exotic breeds known for aggression; analyzing medical report intricacy—we now shift focus towards getting to know your potential legal partner, Carlson Bier.

Founded with a vision to ensure compensation for personal injury victims ravaged by unforeseen circumstances beyond their control, we are that vital lifeline in turbulent times. Our team of seasoned personal injury attorneys have relentlessly fought and secured rightful settlements for numerous innocent victims navigating the complex world of Dog Bite Injuries. Armed with this vast experience arsenal, every new case is tackled with the same unwavering dedication.

Moreover, our empathetic approach ensures that beyond crafting successful claims, victims feel heard and genuinely cared for during tough healing periods- Gabriel Carlson and Anita Bier look forward to potentially representing you in your quest for justice. Prioritize recovery while we journey through the legal maze on your behalf ensuring surefire success; let us diligently pursue proper compensation rightfully owed due to another’s negligence!

Meeting the highest quality standards at every turn of our legal engagements is a core tenet at Carlson Bier. We trust transparency–offering a clear idea regarding fees— working with no upfront charges or hidden costs methodology that only expects payment once we secure victory.

With so much valuable insight offered concerning dog bite injuries clothed within Illinois’ jurisdictional specifics—it’s time you took action! The path towards rightful restitution begins here – imagine yourself free from mounting medical bills or psychological trauma worries resulting from the unlawful incident. So why wait? Uncover now what lies beneath resilient negotiation or winning court advocacy skills—that exciting prospect where you find out how much exactly your case could be worth! To initiate this enlightening journey filled with promise—simply click on the button below—empower yourself today! Remember: At Carlson Bier—a brighter future awaits you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Casey Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Casey

Areas of Practice in Casey

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering specialist legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Extending expert legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Fall Mishaps

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for harms and losses.

Motorbike Accidents

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on providing professional legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to supporting patients with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​