FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Central

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to handling Dog Bite Injuries cases, Carlson Bier is a renowned name in Central. Offering expertise within the realms of personal injury law, our services are tailored for those who have experienced such traumatic situations firsthand. We understand that dealing with your injury can be frightening and confusing—especially when insurance companies or dog owners become uncooperative. Our team’s profound understanding of Illinois’ dog bite laws aims to alleviate these concerns and navigate you through this complicated legal territory effectively and easily, ensuring your rights are upheld throughout the process. With an impressive track record for securing favorable settlements for our clients, we’re committed to providing diligent representation designed towards winning your case. Acknowledging every client’s unique situation is paramount at Carlson Bier; hence each case management strategically incorporates personalized handling aimed at achieving successful results promptly and efficiently while minimizing financial burdens on victims because justice should never be compromised by costs or geography limitations.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Central Illinois

At Carlson Bier, understanding your rights and remedies in the face of a harrowing experience like a dog bite injury is paramount to us. As an Illinois-based personal injury attorney group, we leverage our vast legal expertise to demystify the complexities surrounding dog bite injuries in everyday jargon that’s digestible for all.

Dog bites are both physically and emotionally traumatizing. The injury could result in permanent scars, severe pain, emotional distress as well as hefty financial obligations for treatment and rehabilitation. If you find yourself victimized by a dog bite incident, it’s vital to know precisely what your legal options are to ensure optimal restoration – financially and psychologically.

• You possess the right for full compensation: Under Illinois law, owners bear complete responsibility if their pet harms another individual unless the aggrieved party instigated the attack or was unlawfully on the property where it occurred.

• Dog owner liability isn’t limited to biting only: Dog owners can be held accountable even when their pets inflict harm without actually biting such as knocking you down accidentally causing serious injury.

• No aggressive breed exemption from liability: Although some breeds historically have higher instances of harming individuals than others, any form of resulting damage makes them liable irrespective of breed reputation.

Unfortunately, obtaining fair compensation post-dog-bite incident isn’t always trouble-free. It frequently requires substantial evidence illustrating that you were not at fault and that truly the dog owner violated Illinois’ Animal Control Act (ACA). That’s where expert assistance from seasoned personal injury attorneys like Carlson Bier comes into play.

We meticulously analyze your individual circumstances to establish compelling proofs showcasing clearly how ACA violation led to your predicament. Appropriate documentation including medical records substantiating treatment expenses and severity of injuries forms part of this evidence trove along with photographs highlighting brutal physical damages sustained alongside eyewitness testimonials affirming non-provocation on your behalf during animal aggression.

In specific cases warranting so due to extreme nature of inflicted injuries or non-compliance by the offender to animal control orders necessitate us to encompass critical additional compensatory elements into your legal claim such as psychological trauma induced therapy costs, punitive damages against the owner for reckless negligence towards public safety.

At Carlson Bier, we stand by you throughout this demanding journey actualizing a steadfast commitment towards achieving maximum compensation that truly reflects the magnitude of your suffering and financial distress. Our fact-oriented apolitical approach means focusing fully on tangible proofs shunning gratuitous dramatization that often typifies personal injury scenarios consequently ensuring enhanced credibility of your case augmenting winning odds substantially in any negotiation or litigation scenario.

Rest assured, our one-on-one dedicated consultation is completely free, giving you unrestricted access to experienced Illinois personal injury attorneys who will not only clarify all ambiguities circumscribing dog bite law in its entirety but also assess realistically how much your specific case could be worth based on numerous factors ensuing solely from their deep-seated understanding of varied intricacies surrounding Illinois dog bite legislation.

Consider acquiring knowledge about dog bite victim rights and entitlements as more than just an informed choice; it’s absolute power – power helping you steer through tumultuous times confidently reclaiming deserved normality both from a health and wealth perspective while making communities safely habitable for everyone. To rightly quantify how much exactly is at stake here for you under Illinois law due to dog-induced damage under distinct circumstances, simply click the button below. Let Carlson Bier assist in transforming inflicted pain into positive hopeful action today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Central Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Central

Areas of Practice in Central

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing specialist legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering experienced legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Fall Occurrences

Professional in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain just recompense for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring adept legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Building Accidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in delivering dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​