FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Central

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing a medical malpractice situation in Central, it remains crucial to select an attorney who will diligently defend your rights. Carlson Bier is committed to ensuring your interests are significantly represented. Possessing vast knowledge regarding Illinois’ legal terrain, our team of seasoned attorneys specializes in medical malpractice cases, presenting an engaging blend of expertise and thoroughness unique to our group. We revel in the successful history established over years defending clients across various medical negligence scenarios; from wrong diagnosis mishaps to procedural errors resulting in prolonged suffering or death. Our rapport with clients through open communication affirms our unwavering commitment towards achieving fair settlements or verdicts that compensate for pain, lost income or healthcare costs accrued due to professional negligence in healthcare delivery. Partnering with Carlson Bier means having tenacious advocates relentlessly fighting on behalf of victims affected by irresponsible clinical practices while meeting stringent ethical standards synonymous with Illinois law practice—a testament true not just for any Medical Malpractice lawyer but only the best—Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Central Illinois

Medical malpractice is a complex area of personal injury law. In its simplest terms, it refers to negligence on the part of a healthcare provider which leads to patient harm. Carlson Bier, an eminent personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, dedicates a significant portion of their practice to medical malpractice cases. They passionately pursue justice for victims who have suffered serious injuries, or worse, had a loved one killed as a result of negligent healthcare practices. This commitment stems from their profound understanding of the devastating consequences such an event can have on individuals and families alike.

Delving deeper into medical malpractice gives us greater insight into its various forms: surgical errors; misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis; childbirth injuries; medicine dosage mistakes or prescribing wrong medications; ignoring or not taking appropriate patient history, to name just a few. The repercussions often extend far beyond physical pain and suffering, significantly affecting psychological well-being and financial stability as well. Thus underlining the importance of seeking expert legal assistance when confronted with such unfortunate circumstances.

Carlson Bier provides incomparable medical malpractice representation driven by experience, expertise and empathy. Crucial aspects distinguishing them include:

• Comprehensive Case Evaluation: Due diligence is observed at every step—starting from ensuring your claim qualifies as medical malpractice under Illinois laws to meticulously investigating all aspects connected with your case.

• Expert Counselling & Representation: By simplifying complicated legal processes into easy-to-understand concepts for clients and ardently advocating for them in court.

• No-Upfront Fee: Paramount priority is placed on seeking justice—not money upfront –and fees are only taken once you receive fair compensation for your suffering.

Despite the best intentions behind healthcare delivery systems, sometimes things do go horribly wrong inflicting irreversible damage on patients due to negligent care. When these events transpire, retaining skilled lawyers like those at Carlson Bier will be instrumental in filing lawsuits against healthcare providers like doctors or hospitals implicated in causing harm.

Even with the very real prospects of substantial compensations, it is essential to remember that not all poor outcomes in healthcare are tantamount to medical malpractice. What distinguishes a regrettable outcome from malpractice is ‘standard of care.’ Naturally, questions arise: what could a reasonably prudent practitioner have done under similar circumstances? Was there deviation from accepted standards leading to patient harm? Placing your trust in Carlson Bier means putting decades-long experience and knowledge to work for you—clarifying ambiguities, answering pressing concerns, validating your claim against stringent legal criteria and ensuring statutory compliance.

Moreover, as Illinois laws set strict time limits within which claims need to be filed – typically two years from when you first realized you suffered harm – proactive action becomes crucial. Proving medical malpractice claims necessitate an intricate understanding of both law and medicine; hence the importance of choosing accomplished litigators like those at Carlson Bier cannot be overstated.

Finally, we understand finding out how much your case might be worth can often add confidence to proceed with litigation and help establish realistic expectations concerning potential rewards or settlements. This is why we offer a free case evaluation tool right on our website. You’re invited now to click on the button below for an initial assessment of your situation without any obligations whatsoever. Carlson Bier’s personal injury attorneys stand ready to provide dedicated service with utter professionalism — irrespective of where you’re located across Illinois—we’re always just one call away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that: 1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages; 2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and 3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that: 1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and 2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that: 1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and 2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits. Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Central Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Central

Areas of Practice in Central

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing specialist legal services for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Tumble Injuries

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Accident

Offering specialist legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Building Incidents

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Focused on offering dedicated legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in assisting patients with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​