FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Central

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a pedestrian accident can be traumatic and life-altering. Choosing the right legal representation is crucial in pursuing rightful compensation for damages, physical distress, emotional trauma, lost wages and other unforeseeable implications of such unfortunate incidents. In this context, Carlson Bier emerges as your premier choice to represent you in Central’s judicial scenario as experienced Pedestrian Accident attorneys. Our distinguished pedigree combines years of expertise with an unbroken chain of success that positions us ahead of our peers; reinforced by numerous testimonials from clients we have served diligently across Illinois.

At Carlson Bier, understanding our client’s unique predicament forms the cornerstone of our service delivery model; making it tailor-made for each specific case falling under pedestrian accidents category. We painstakingly piece together evidence collected meticulously to create a robust representation catered perfectly to establish liability efficiently.

Our commitment extends beyond just getting fair remuneration—we strive relentlessly towards ensuring restoration and rehabilitation check all boxes on comprehensive recovery map post-accident. Harness the power option: Choose wisdom —Choose Prominence—Choose Carlson Bier—the steadfast defenders in your hour of need!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Central Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we empathize with the distressing circumstances surrounding pedestrian accidents. Our dedicated team of professional personal injury attorneys in Illinois specializes in representing individuals involved in these unfortunate incidents.

Pedestrian accidents often result in severe injuries and can drastically impact victims’ lives. You could find yourself dealing with immense medical bills, physical therapy expenses and prolonged time off work due to hospitalization or recovery periods. The long-lasting repercussions may extend beyond physical harm to psychological trauma that needs ongoing care.

The legal nuances surrounding pedestrian accident cases are intricate and can be challenging for the layperson to navigate solo. Determining fault is a critical aspect of any case, where factors such as speed limit adherence, crosswalk usage, signal compliance, among others come into consideration. Meanwhile, several laws govern motorists’ duty towards pedestrians such as keeping adequate lookout and exercising caution while driving.

• Understanding Your Rights: The law attributes considerable rights to pedestrians aimed at their safety on roadways. Motorists are required by law to respect those rights at all points.

• Proving Negligence: The success of your claim typically hinges upon proving negligence on the part of the motorist involved — a task that can be arduous without expert guidance.

• Compensation Entitlements: Upon making your claim successfully you are likely entitled to compensation covering medical expenses, lost income due to inability to work during recovery period and possible mental discomfort stemming from the accident.

Carlson Bier’s expert attorneys take time comprehending each unique case scenario with meticulous examination of evidence gathered from various sources including witness statements, CCTV footage if available along with comprehensive scrutiny of accident locations matching them with events as described by affected parties; not forgetting seeking consultations with experts whenever needed aiming for most favorable outcomes for our clients

Our mission is not only about winning cases but about offering a supportive environment catered specifically towards understanding individual client concerns allaying uncertainties they might have during proceedings hence forming holistic solutions that are not only legally robust, but also empathetic.

Pursuing a personal injury claim can be intimidating. However, with the Carlson Bier team advocating for you, rest assured we will do our best to get you fair and maximum compensation appropriate for your circumstance. We’re dedicated to doing relentless work in bringing negligent parties to justice—always keeping our promise of helping clients rebuild their lives post-accident.

Accidents can happen without warning and turn life upside down in a snap. Understanding this, as part of our strong commitment to serving community needs around Illinois, we’re here extending support when it matters most in trying times following pedestrian accidents.

With all this said, every accident case requires individualized assessment. If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident and seeks representation that is committed towards fighting for rightful damages owed on your behalf while providing necessary guidance through the process – click on the button below immediately! Find out an estimate about how much is potentially due from the negligent party involved in your case by reaching out to us today; let’s help make this difficult time easier.

At Carlson Bier remember our core principle remains: Your fight, becomes ours too showing stern resolve dealing with difficult situations together equally driven towards securing justice which each client rightfully deserves! Allow us provide expert legal assistance without further ado – because nothing is more important than getting back on track with life again after major setbacks like these witnessed through pedestrian accidents.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Central Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Central

Areas of Practice in Central

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Giving skilled legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Tumble Accidents

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents secure just settlement for harms and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending experienced legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Expert in providing professional legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Harm

Expert in representing persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​