Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cerro Gordo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Cerro Gordo, when searching for a lawyer to navigate the complexities of dog bite injury litigation, look no further than Carlson Bier. With an impressive record in personal injury cases, our team is seasoned in representing clients who have encountered unfortunate incidents of dog bite injuries. Navigating Illinois law can be challenging; however, the lawyers at Carlson Bier provide expertise effortlessly—informing you about your rights and assessing liability with precision. Our diligent work ethic ensures all necessary investigations are executed perfectly. Possessing acute knowledge regarding owner obligations under state’s strict animal control laws allows us to stylishly apply relevant statutes increasing chances for favorable outcomes. Moreover, throughout this painstaking process we weave together solid defenses while cultivating strategies that provide maximum compensation possibilities—all without stepping foot into Cerro Gordo! Offering transparency from start until victory along with distance-sensitive communication facilities underscores our customer-centric approach making Carlson Bier a far-reaching paragon amidst other legal entities within personal injury circles across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cerro Gordo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a passionate team of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois who specialize in cases involving dog bite injuries. Our aim is to enlighten and assist individuals who have been victims of such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bites often lead to significant physical pain and emotional trauma. Post-bite complications include infection, nerve damage, and psychological distress. Furthermore, the victim may also bear the additional financial burden for treating these medical conditions which can be overwhelming.

To provide legal assistance in these scenarios, Carlson Bier has established its reputation by successfully representing numerous dog bite victims over the years.Orderly processing of claims for dog bite injuries calls for specific knowledge concerning local laws on pet owners’ liability and substantial proficiency in negotiating with insurance companies.

Illinois law states that proof of negligence is not necessary if proving a dog attack under certain conditions.These include – The person affected did nothing to provoke the animal; The person had a lawful right to be at the location where they encountered the dangerous animal.A significant fact about our state-specific law secures ample legal support for victims in stressful times.

At Carlson Bier, your welfare matters immensely to us.With this belief, we diligently ensure:

– Thorough investigation of each case.

– Comprehensive calculation of damages including medical expenses,future treatment costs,and compensation for pain,suffering,and loss of income.

– Expert negotiation with insurance company representatives.

– Preparation and presentation of compelling evidence at trial when negotiations fail.

Our intuitive understanding coupled with vast professional experience assures you an empathetic guide through intricate legal proceedings.Our firm focuses on helping injured individuals achieve justice rather than on garnering commercial success which makes us stand out distinctly amidst our contemporaries.

Moreover,to alleviate some stress from our clients we operate strictly on a contingency fee basis.This implies that there are no upfront fees or hidden charges.You only pay if we win or settle your case.Just another token gesture from Carlson Bier showing that ‘We Advocate For Your Well-being’.

In personal injury cases, particularly in dog bite incidents,timing is crucial. Preserving evidence, documenting your injuries, and seeking prompt medical treatment can make all the difference in your case.So do not postpone!

Furthermore,included below is an easy-to-use tool that lets you calculate the potential value of your claim.A click might bring a personalized reassurance of your legal position.This serves as an excellent pre-consultation step adding considerable weight to your confidence when dealing with such life-altering circumstances.

With this wealth of information at your fingertips, we invite you to take action. Click on the button below and discover what Carlson Bier can truly accomplish for you.Let’s determine how much exactly is your case worth! Trust us,you are just one decisive click away from making a significant stride towards justice. Let our expert team be the bridge between you and rightful compensation.Welcome aboard!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cerro Gordo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cerro Gordo

Areas of Practice in Cerro Gordo

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing expert legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending experienced legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Skilled in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Offering legal support for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending expert legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in extending expert legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Committed to representing clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer