...

Bicycle Accidents in Champaign

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to bicycle accident representation, Carlson Bier ranks among the top-tier law firms. Bicycle accidents can be traumatic and complex; hence you need experienced legal champions on your side like those at Carlson Bier. As personal injury lawyers, our specialty extends into these unpredictable circumstances that often occur in Champaign. With a track record of successful resolutions in favor of our clients, we meticulously prepare for every case with extensive research and robust arguments focused towards securing optimum compensation claims. Our dedicated team understands Illinois state laws pertaining to bicycle accidents thoroughly and can proficiently navigate any intricacies involved therein affecting Champaign residents or occurrences within its limits. We’re committed to delivering empathetic support coupled with assertive representation effectively safeguarding your interests throughout the legal journey? Why settle for less when you have access to brilliant legal minds capable of fighting tirelessly for justice? The optimal choice is clear – choose Carlson Bier as your go-to representative when dealing with bicycle incidents in vibrant Champaign city!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Champaign Illinois

Are you or your loved one a victim of a bicycle accident in Illinois? At Carlson Bier, we understand the complex emotional and fiscal hardships these accidents can cause. As personal injury attorneys specializing in bicycle accidents, we believe that awareness and information are powerful tools for prevention and justice. Through years of experience with myriad cases and varying degrees of complexity, we have developed expertise in assisting our clients in navigating through this challenging ordeal.

Bicycle accidents can result from various factors including motorist negligence, environmental issues, faulty equipment or infringement of cyclist’s rights by other road users or authorities. These unfortunate events often lead to significant physical injuries like bone fractures, head trauma or even spinal cord injuries; not to mention the profound psychological impacts it can on make the victims and their families.

– Incorrect lane changes,

– Distracted driving (like texting),

– Reckless driving,

– Improper turns,

– Overtaking without sufficient space,

These are some prevalent causes behind bicycle-related traffic mishaps caused by negligent drivers. Accidents may also occur due to ill-maintained road surfaces—a responsibility which falls under local municipalities’ purview—and make them liable for any resulting damage.

In understanding how these situations unfold, it’s crucial to know your rights as a cyclist under Illinois law:

• You have full access to all lanes just like any other vehicle.

• You possess equal privileges as drivers, requiring others to respect your riding space.

• Wearing earphones while cycling is against state laws unless they’re used over one ear only.

• You are legally entitled to signal turning using either hand.

Armed with this knowledge about legal rights & common pitfalls help establish ground for prosecuting offending parties on fair terms.

Knowing what steps to take immediately after an accident is also vital— most importantly gathering necessary evidence from the scene:

– Taking photographs of injuries sustained by victims,

– Damages made visible onto bicycles or cars involved,

– The accident site showing road condition or potential hazards,

– Contact details from witnesses to cross-reference accounts later.

Yet, knowing your rights and immediate steps isn’t enough— timings to file the suit and pursuing insurance claims also plays a significant role. In Illinois, generally, you have two years from the date of injury to file for a personal injury claim but four years in case of property damage claim. Meanwhile, dealing with insurers directly can often feel like navigating through an opaque maze as they primarily aim at paying minimum compensation—not ensuring justice for victims.

This is where Carlson Bier embodies its commitment to aiding bicycle accidents victims through our personal legal service. Our expert attorneys guide clients thoroughly from assessment through resolution phases incorporating a full understanding of state laws, providing aggressive representation while acquiring rightful compensations.

Residing amidst communities which we serve over the last several decades allows us for better empathy toward our clientele while fostering close relationships translating into detailed attention each case receives at Carlson Bier. We take immense pride not just in resolving lawsuits favorably but assisting individuals transition smoother past unfortunate events onto their regular lives by helping them regain financial stability post such incidents.

Carlson Bier empathetically upholds victim’s legal rights signifying our firm representing Illinois motto – State Sovereignty; National Union – equally championing sovereignty (righteousness) for individual citizens while fostering national progress conjointly. Remember that having an advocate on your side who understands intricacies involved within such legal proceedings enormously increases chances at securing maximum possible settlement benefit ensuring not just your bills get paid but any future medical treatments are covered along with due compensation for endured pain & suffering caused by someone else’s negligence.

If you or your loved one has been injured in a bicycle accident and need professional help finding out how much your case worth might actually be—click on the button below and start your journey towards rightful reparation right here at Carlson Bier today! All consultations are strictly confidential and carry no obligation whilst providing a comprehensive outlook onto your potential claim prospects. Together, let’s chart towards a safer, equitable tomorrow.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Champaign Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Champaign

Areas of Practice in Champaign

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing adept legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal support to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Occurrences

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents get fair settlement for injuries and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing experienced legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Building Mishaps

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in offering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in defending patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer