Car Accidents Attorney in Channahon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the unsettling aftermath of a car accident in Channahon, it’s essential to have reliable legal support at your disposal. Selecting Carlson Bier gives you access to an exceptional team of personal injury lawyers that will tirelessly fight for your compensation rights. Our vast experience in successfully managing numerous auto accident claims across Illinois positions us as leaders in this field, and equips us with the knowledge necessary to obtain optimal results for our clients. We believe each case is unique and deserves thorough evaluation – thus ensuring tailor-made defense strategies that reflect individual circumstances surrounding your vehicle mishap. At Carlson Bier, we’re famed for more than just winning cases; we take pride in the compassionate approach adopted by each attorney towards victims caught up in these traumatic incidents. Count on our tenacity and proficiency within Illinois law scope for car accidents-related matters when selecting an accomplished ally to advocate on your behalf – opt for Carlson Bier’s trusted expertise.

About Carlson Bier

Car Accidents Lawyers in Channahon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing victims of personal injuries and more specifically, car accidents. Comprised of a team of seasoned legal professionals based out of Illinois, our collective mission is to offer expert guidance coupled with compassionate support. We want you to understand the complexities surrounding auto accident cases and the importance of securing skilled representation.

When it comes to car accidents, several factors can contribute to their occurrence including but not limited to driver error, distracted driving, impaired driving due to drug or alcohol consumption, reckless driving, or deficient vehicle maintenance. Each case is distinct, demanding tailored strategies for pursuing maximum compensation.

There’s an array of damages that can be sought after an automobile accident:

– Medical treatment expenses: This includes any immediate care needed at the scene as well as projected future medical treatments related to your injury.

– Loss of earnings: This covers earnings missed during your recovery period and also potential future income if your capabilities are permanently impacted by the incident.

– Pain and suffering: Compensable under certain conditions – like emotional or mental anguish – pain and suffering are valid claim aspects depending on individual state laws.

– Property damage: If there’s property loss due to accident such as vehicle repairs or replacement values.

It should not go unnoticed that establishing fault in car accident cases can often evolve into contentious battles with insurance companies looking out for their best interests rather than yours. Having proficient lawyers from Carlson Bier on your side will ensure informed decisions while navigating pretrial investigations which may involve accident reconstruction experts among others critical steps towards crafting a persuasive case strategy further solidifying your potential gain.

Equally crucial is understanding time frames inherent within personal injury law proceedings. Illinois stipulates specific statutory periods under which one might file a suit post-accident—commonly known as statutes of limitations—which if breached could jeopardize potential recompense regardless how genuine the claim presented is. Our attorneys meticulously monitor these deadlines ensuring timely action birthing optimal outcomes.

At this juncture, it is possibly becoming evident that a good legal advisor or team could be beneficial following a car accident. This is particularly accurate when one recognizes the intricate nature of claim negotiations, navigating state regulations while ensuring that your concerns are resolutely represented through to resolution – much less doing so whilst nursing lingering physical and psychological scars from the incident.

There’s also a common assumption harbored by victims, often under informed influence of adjusters representing at fault parties—rushing towards settlement in hope for instant recompense only to realize their shortchanged lot too late into the process. It’s worth noting there exists involved processes like subrogation where our attorneys protect deserving victim’s interests against insurance carriers potentially clawing back some of these readily settled claims.

Highly personalized service offering coupled with immense pride we take championing our client’s interests provides Carlson Bier potency translating each engagement into unique tailored highly effective legal approaches that best serve your interest.

If you have been injured due to a car accident and seeking advice on what steps to take next, do not hesitate any longer. Your rights as an accident victim matter. At Carlson Bier, we zealously advocate on behalf of individuals just like you because every case counts – mightily at least to those experiencing these unfortunate predicaments firsthand! We invite you now keen reader – use the available button below – inquire further about your potential claim value from our expert team who will attentively listen and advise accordingly – Because Your Shield Is Our Duty!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Channahon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

     

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Channahon

Areas of Practice in Channahon

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering expert legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Extending experienced legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Tumble Accidents

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Harms

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Incidents: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Collision

Providing expert legal support for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to delivering compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Specializing in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer