FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Chapin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you are a victim of a slip and fall accident in Chapin, you require dedicated legal representation. Carlson Bier can provide the robust defense that your case demands. Our firm has substantial expertise guiding clients through complex personal injury claims related to slip and falls, leveraging our nuanced understanding of Illinois law to advocate for maximum compensation. We comprehend the intricate details often at play within such cases – facilitating desired outcomes amidst challenging situations requires this acumen. Irrespective of where an accident occurred – be it public places like supermarkets or private residences – we fight relentlessly for justice on our client’s behalf with attention to detail, agility, persistence; assuring timely resolution whilst ensuring fair treatment from all involved parties such as insurance companies etcetera. Focused on competence,Yield your trust to Carlson Bier attorneys – experience optimal results by choosing us during these difficult times when battling severe injuries from slipping or falling incidents throughout Chapin .

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Chapin Illinois

Since our founding, Carlson Bier has been zealously representing victims of slip and fall accidents in Illinois. We understand the trauma that comes with these types of mishaps and take pride in offering robust advocacy to help accident victims recover their just due. Personal injuries can lead to high medical bills, lost wages, lifelong disabilities, or even death; nevertheless, it is crucial to understand your rights if you are a victim.

Slip and fall accidents often occur as a result of negligence by property owners who neglect responsibilities they owe to those they invite onto their premises. These duties include a consistent inspection of the premises for any potential hazards such as slippery floors, ice or snow on walkways, poorly lit areas, uneven floors or pavements among other risk factors.

In order for an injury claim to be valid after these accidents:

• Clear evidence must show that the property owner was aware of the hazard but did nothing about it.

• The hazardous condition existed for some time during which the owner should have identified and rectified it.

• The property owner was negligent in creating the dangerous circumstance leading to the injury.

The laws surrounding slip-and-fall cases in Illinois can often seem complex. For instance, our state operates under Comparative Negligence rules which could potentially affect your compensation if you are found partially at fault for your fall. This intricacy demands qualified personal injury attorneys from Carlson Bier with comprehensive knowledge about Illinois’s local law system so that your rights aren’t trampled upon.

At Carlson Bier, we believe no two slip-and-fall cases are alike and we treat each lawsuit with individual attention geared towards maximizing client recovery. Our detailed approach starts right from obtaining all applicable insurance coverage information through aggressive negotiations with insurance adjusters up until claims resolution either by settlement discussions or jury verdicts.

Your initial consultation at our office guarantee you access to following:

• Detailed examination of your case

• Discussion on various legal routes available

• Description of likely timelines and possible outcomes

• Free guidance devoid of legal jargon

It is our responsibility to relieve you from the stress that often comes with navigating complex legal procedures so that you can fully concentrate on your recovery.

More than any other type of personal injury case, slip-and-fall accidents require an attorney who understands the specific dynamics involved in these complicated situations. At Carlson Bier, we have decades-long experience doing just this – fighting tooth and nail for victims all around Illinois.

Losses and damages incurred could be overwhelming following a fall but taking swift action cuts down on further complications. You shouldn’t endure hardship or victimization as a result of others’ negligence. Trust us to protect your rights and interests with the utmost vigor and fidelity.

At Carlson Bier, we operate on No Recovery – No Fee basis ensuring you incur no charges until we win a favorable judgement or settlement for your claim.

Have you been injured due to someone else’s neglect? Don’t grapple alone with piling medical bills or concerns about lost work hours!

Seize this opportunity NOW! Click below and take advantage of our FREE consultation service to find out how much your case could potentially be worth. Let’s get started today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chapin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Chapin

Areas of Practice in Chapin

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering professional legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Delivering professional legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying expert legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Stumble Occurrences

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Damages

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents receive reasonable payout for hurts and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering professional legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Construction Collisions

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Committed to delivering specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Committed to advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​