...

Bicycle Accidents in Charleston

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a bicycle accident, your immediate priority should be recovering from your injuries. Legal complications can feel overwhelming and daunting without proper guidance. Enter Carlson Bier – Illinois-based champions in personal injury law with robust expertise in handling bicycle accidents claims effectively nationwide. When it comes to understanding intricate laws surrounding bike accidents, few legal firms operate at our level of precision and due diligence across different states including Charleston.

Our success lies not only in our extensive experience but also in genuinely caring about every client we guide through the jargon-filled labyrinth that is litigation following an accident – regardless of where they are located geographically. We value open communication ensuring you receive clear-cut updates while we aggressively pursue maximum compensation on your behalf.

At Carlson Bier, quality service transcends borders, affirming why we are regarded as an outstanding choice for representation when it’s patrially about fighting for justice after a bicycling accident incident.

Trust us to treat every case – whether big or small – with utmost sensitivity and attention it deserves because no one understands bicycle accidents law quite like us: Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Charleston Illinois

Carlson Bier, skillfully representing victims of bicycle accidents in Illinois, understands the intricate nature of these types of cases. Since bicycles do not have the protective structure that automobiles offer their riders can suffer traumatic injuries during such incidents. As a reliable personal injury attorney group in Illinois, we prioritize securing justice and fair compensation for our clientele.

Comprehending circumstances leading to bicycle accidents is an integral part of what we do at Carlson Bier. Most frequently, bike accidents are spurred by car drivers’ negligence–such as drivers not yielding to cyclists or overlooking them completely since they are smaller than other vehicles on the road. In other situations, hazardous road conditions or defective bikes could contribute to accidents. Our experienced attorneys examine every detail meticulously to establish who is responsible for your predicament.

Injuries resulting from such incidents can be severe and life-altering; ranging from fractures and broken bones to traumatic brain injuries; tragically some may even result in death. At this point it’s necessary to emphasize:

– Immediate medical attention post any accident greatly assists future litigation.

– Documentation: Keep track of all health professional visits related and paperwork thereof.

– Witnesses: Collect contact information if there were witnesses present during the incidence.

All this data becomes crucial when our proficient team at Carlson Bier commences building a strong case

It’s important also that victims understand their rights post encountering a bicycle accident in Illinois. Your potential claim could encompass more than just medical expenses; emotional trauma, lost wages due to recovery period absence from work might also be eligible areas you could seek recompense for. According to Illinois law:

– Cyclists hold similar rights as automobile operators while on the road.

– Motorists must allow three feet distance minimum when passing cyclists.

– Opening vehicle doors into traffic (and potentially into a cyclist’s path) without caution is unlawful – which knowningly is referred commonly as ‘dooring’.

Seizing any compensation might be daunting without proper legal guidance. To amicably navigate these precarious waters, you require an experienced champion for your cause – Carlson Bier.

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves in our keen client-centric approach – as every case and individual is different, so are the solutions we concoct. As revered bicycle accident attorneys in Illinois, we meticulously review your situation to ascertain that you receive the maximum settlement feasible. Our firm operates on a contingency fee basis which translates to: No win? No charges!

Our wealth of experience has gifted us with immense knowledge regarding insurance companies’ strategies employed to minimize or deny claims entirely; rest assured at Carlson Bier we confront such actions efficaciously leaving no stone unturned defending our clients’ rights.

It’s paramount for victims to quickly seek competent legal intervention subsequent a cycle accident given the restrictive time frames set by statute of limitations within Illinois (typically two years from incident date). Delaying this could jeopardize potential compensation validity; therefore it’s vital that victims not delay reaching out to a skilled attorney like us.

Recovering physical harmed is harsh enough–let us shoulder your legal burden making sure justice is served adequately. Allow Carlson Bier to elucidate complicated law jargon and procedures clearly while allaying any fears concerning aerial costs by offering an absolutely FREE consultation.

Imagine having proficient defenders actively fighting on one’s behalf, unravelling intricacies of personal injury issues freeing up indispensable bandwidth focusing instead on recovery. That’s what choosing Carlson Bier offers – seasoned experts unfailingly ensuring tenable claim resolution fostering worthwhile peace of mind.

Now let’s transform imagination into reality by confirming how much worth precisely lies latent in your case thus far! With one simple click let us show you how deserving victimized cyclists can reclaim control over their lives post encountering potentially debilitating accidents. For an authoritative evaluation and unparalleled advice from Carlson Bier trusted team simply click on the button below NOW. Why not? After all, it’s absolutely free! Go on then, take the first leap towards rightful restitution – TODAY!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Charleston Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Charleston

Areas of Practice in Charleston

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending expert legal advice for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Mishaps

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents gain just payout for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring professional legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Worksite Collisions

Focused on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Committed to extending dedicated legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer