FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chatham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one is grappling with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Chatham, Carlson Bier is primed to use their vast experience, substantial resources and understanding of Illinois law for your benefit. Recognized for our keen commitment to delivering justice for victims of Dog Bite Injuries, we strive relentlessly on behalf of our clients. With unrivalled proficiency in handling complex litigation scenarios associated with Dog Bite Injuries across Illinois territory, Carlson Bier stands as an indispensable ally in your pursuit towards regaining normalcy post such disruptions. Our dedicated team goes beyond providing legal representation by involving themselves deeply into each case ensuring that every unique requirement meets its righteous ending – be it medical expenses recovery or psychological trauma compensation or both. Selecting us means conferring your trust upon accomplished experts who specialize not just in winning battles but restoring peace too – right where you reside! Trust us at Carlson Bier: navigating Chatham’s legal waters with care and precision to secure the future you deserve after enduring severe worldly trials like dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chatham Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand just how sudden and life-changing a dog bite injury can be. Having practiced personal injury law in Illinois for years, our dedicated team is ready to help you navigate the legal process that ensues following such an unforeseen incident. We place your well-being at the heart of our service provision, working tirelessly to secure justice and adequate financial compensation to cater to your medical bills, emotional distress, lost income among other impacts you have experienced as a result of a dog bite.

Dog bites are not only physically damaging but psychologically traumatic too. The Carlson Bier team stands by its commitment to guide each client through these trying times with compassion but also resilience against those reluctant insurers or individuals unwilling to address their liabilities. Fortunately, in the state of Illinois, victims of dog attacks are protected under what is termed “strict liability” doctrine – providing robust support for any harmed individuals seeking redress.

Understandably so, many are unfamiliar with this concept – strict liability spells out that a dog owner is held accountable for injuries caused irrespective of the creature’s past behavior or tendencies. In simpler terms:

– You do not need to prove negligence on part of the pet owner

– You do not need evidence showing the animal had previously exhibited aggressive or violent behaviour

This pivotal aspect simplifies claims considerably from proving fault complexity standpoint and ensures fairer resolution potential for victims. But where does one start after experiencing an unanticipated accident such as a canine attack? Trust in Carlson Bier’s proficient expertise tailored comprehensively towards assuaging concerns involved parties might harbor about successfully pursuing rightful recompense post-dog-bite-injury scenario.

The first logical step our accomplished attorneys suggest would be seeking immediate professional medical aid − essential both from health perspective ensuring suitable care provided promptly but equally prudent collecting verifiable documentation supporting case-building process later down line during negotiations court proceedings if needed. Once discretely handled family physician hospital staff visit survivors should then consider consulting skilled personal injury attorney such Carlson Bier’s ensemble legal advocates.

Having represented numerous clients through similar circumstances, our seasoned litigators are well-acquainted with all associated factors – meeting burden of proof requirements, challenges to validity or extent of the injuries reported and more; that often arise whilst proving a dog bite claim. Trust in our hands-on expertise to navigate you successfully from filing the lawsuit against the culpable parties all through arbitration or trial stages where remedies sought get declared by respective judicial authority.

Remember too, not every injury necessitates an immediate manifestation and even seemingly minor bites can develop into serious health complications down the line which would merit compensation above what was initially thought. And precisely for this reason, obtaining rightful recompense matched proportionately to your sustained injuries is why lawyers like ours are integral to any filed suit. Our professional promise continually safeguards victims seeking help throughout Illinois demystifying litigation process bolstering individual chances of achieving maximum possible payout assurance.

We take pride in ensuring our client’s welfare takes precedence while zealously advocating their rights before law court armed with compelling evidence investigative capacities inherent within personal injury law sector uncover owing settlements each case entrusts us thus bringing value-driven satisfaction amongst nurtured rapport shared parties spanning years’ consummate dedication towards serving justice bound community members at large.

To wrap up, Carlson Bier very much appreciates how much invaluable trust you place in us during these testing times − acknowledging sensitivity we invite anyone grappling aftermath unforeseen traumatic event explore potential compensation opportunities utilizing deep realm knowledge accrued over time battling countless personal injury battles waged within courtroom environment where every single claim handled by expert team holds intrinsic sense uncompromising vigor propped legal acumen infused compassion driven preservations ingrained part firm culture since inception centered around delivering results rightly deserved victims unfortunate circumstance befell them unexpectedly.

So let’s start exploring how much your specific case might be worth today! Through the click of a button below, rest assured we are primed and ready to fight for your rights in turning around this regrettable incident into a potential opportunity to receive well-merited payouts under Illinois law. Trust Carlson Bier’s unwavering commitment transit your case from potential to actual justice served promptly – Click the button below and let’s begin this journey of transformation together.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chatham Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chatham

Areas of Practice in Chatham

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Burns

Providing specialist legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Trip Occurrences

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents secure fair payout for injuries and damages.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Accident

Offering professional legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Construction Crashes

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Harms

Focused on providing expert legal representation for patients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Impairment

Specializing in supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​