FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Chatham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Engaged in the pursuit of justice, Carlson Bier brings forward a remarkable proficiency in handling Medical Malpractice cases. Serving individuals and families affected by negligent medical practices, our attorney group upholds an unyielding dedication to every case we handle. With years of courtroom experience, we navigate the complex landscape of medical malpractice law skillfully; translating this multifaceted discipline into tangible results for you. We prioritize gaining comprehensive understanding of your case – a key factor defining our strong track record with substantial verdicts and settlements under Illinois State Law. Should you need knowledgeable guidance on issues relating to delays or errors in diagnosis/treatments, inappropriate or poorly executed procedures: look no further than Carlson Bier. Your trust is vital to us; hence ensuring confidentiality while adhering strictly to all professional ethics codes remains paramount within our service delivery model at all times. Let Carlson Bier be your champion when medical standards fail holding those responsible accountable for their actions always.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Chatham Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we passionately believe in making the path to justice clear and accessible for those who have been wronged due to medical malpractice. As seasoned personal injury attorneys proudly serving Illinois residents, we strive to ensure you are thoroughly informed about this sensitive subject as education is paramount in safeguarding your rights and interests.

Medical malpractice is a complex legal area involving errors or negligence within healthcare. It stems from instances where a medical professional does not meet the standard level of care resulting in harm, injury, or even death. Despite advancements in technology and practitioner’s expertise, these unfortunate cases remain relatively common yet encompass numerous forms:

• Incorrect diagnosis leads the list: If a doctor’s misdiagnosis results in irrelevant treatment causing unnecessary suffering or neglects condition worsening, it constitutes medical malpractice.

• Surgical errors include incorrect site surgery, nerve damage during an operation, leaving surgical equipment inside patients during procedures, among others.

• Prescription drug mistakes range from providing inappropriate medicine leading to severe side effects or failing to consider patient’s other medications resulting in harmful interactions.

Critical features define whether an act qualifies as medical malpractice. Firstly, there must be a violation of the standard of care. Medical professionals are obliged by law to adhere to accepted protocols and norms acknowledged by the healthcare community; deviating from these standards may cause harm resulting in potential litigation.

Secondly, an injury resulted from negligence needs substantial proof that iatrogenic intervention caused it directly or indirectly.

Finally but no less important lies quantification of damages endured. This can incorporate prolonged physical pain psychological trauma increased medical bills loss wages among other considerations contingent upon specific individual factors involved.

Moreover navigating complexities surrounding Illinois’s Statute of Limitations on such cases – typically two years post-incident discovery – demands adept legal comprehension which our firm confidently delivers. Furthermore compensation calculations often necessitate expert assessments correlating initial harm past/future economic losses quality life diminution prolongation certain aspect vital why acquiring veteran legal representation significant.

At Carlson Bier, we ensure our clients understand their rights under Illinois law and are adept at elucidating the intricacies of medical malpractice. We provide a conducive environment to discuss your case with genuine empathy remembering profoundly personal nature these cases can profoundly impact lives. Our dedicated team does not simply assist obtaining due compensation; also aspire restore faith system justice embarking journey healing together.

With Carlson Bier’s personalized approach ensuring each client treated unique case rather statistic. Our commitment isn’t just towards winning lawsuits – it extends beyond courtrooms into reinstating confidence within the healthcare realm ensuring those responsible held accountable actions providing invaluable peace mind midst otherwise turbulent times.

In terms provocative malfunction instances no stone left unturned empowering succeeding against Goliath-like opponents – formidable insurance companies hospitals health providers—entities often inherently reluctant accept liability quickly dispute claims discourage victims pursuing rightful dues

Undeterred represent solely victim’s side challenging well-equipped adversaries until justice served without initial consultation fees- emphasizing firm stand alongside you through odds collecting fee unless win –- truly encapsulating essence ‘No Win No Fee’ provision reflecting tenacity dedication client advocacy excellency thrive upon.

To discover what your medical malpractice case could potentially be worth, let Carlson Bier guide you through this process transparently garnering fair and full reimbursement for the harm suffered. So why wait? Click on the button below now; it’s time to reclaim control over your life whilst securing future with Carlson Bier as trusted allies in pursuit of justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chatham Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Chatham

Areas of Practice in Chatham

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Fire Damages

Giving skilled legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending professional legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Trip Injuries

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering specialist legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to extending expert legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to representing patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440