...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chenoa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been unfortunate enough to suffer a dog bite injury in Chenoa, the Carlson Bier law firm offers relentless expertise with an unmatched track record. Our legal team specializes in navigating through complex personal injury cases, particularly focusing on those involving animal bites. Dog bite injuries can lead to severe physical pain, emotional trauma and financial strain. At Carlson Bier, we use our profound understanding of Illinois state laws governing such instances to ensure rightful compensation for your suffering and anguish. With our committed attorneys prioritizing communication with clients throughout the duration of the case while relentlessly advocating for their rights against insurance companies and responsible parties alike; it’s no wonder that clients entrust their most vulnerable moments in life to us. We are driven by strong values of diligence, professionalism and client-centric commitment consistently implemented within every litigation process we undertake – making Carlson Bier a top-tier choice when receiving representation for personal injuries sustained from dog bites across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chenoa Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be a traumatic experience, often leaving victims physically injured and emotionally scarred. The law firm Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury attorney group based in Illinois comprehends the depths of these adversities and is committed to providing comprehensive legal support. Our dedicated dog bite attorneys guide you through every step of your claim process from understanding state laws about dog bites to conclusively navigating negotiations or court proceedings for financial recovery.

Illinois has adopted the “Strict Liability” rule in dog bite cases which significantly impacts how such incidents are interpreted legally––it holds the owner of the culprit canine directly responsible for any brought about injuries unless the victim was provoking the animal or trespassing on property owned by the pet’s guardian. However, it must not be overlooked that despite strict liability laws at work, presenting substantial proof against a negligent owner still requires meticulous arguments fortified with evidence, critical analysis and adept interpretation of legislative language; all aspects wherein Carlson Bier thrives.

• Expert lawyers at our practice take substantial steps to collect proper evidence

• We meticulously prepare strong arguments based on prevailing legislation

• Our team skillfully negotiates settlements tailored towards maximum compensation

When embarking on filing a claim after a dog bite incident, certain key factors could potentially impact your case’s outcome:

Negligence – Any documented past behavior of negligence like ignoring leash laws or failure to control an evidently aggressive animal strengthens your case.

Severity of injury – Inflicted wounds spanning from superficial scratches to severe bone fractures necessitate various medical attention degrees hence different compensation amounts.

Permanent damage – Cases revealing permanent disfigurements or impairments due to vicious canine attacks are subjected to higher compensatory mandates given future medical expenses and likely psychological counseling.

Interaction method– If bitten while breaking up aggressive canine fights or inadvertently invading their territory without expectation of harm tends very slightly towards defendant favor under Illinois law.

It should be emphasized that experienced representation greatly aids in delivering solid grounds for each circumstance, enabling a greater chance of successful recompense recovery. The Carlson Bier team is tremendously experienced in handling all peculiarities surrounding dog bite injury cases and can proficiently guide your claim towards a favorable resolution.

Understanding that these situations create stress, distress and contribute greatly to the victim’s financial burden, the firm puts forth its expertise in representing clients with utmost dedication and genuine empathy—an approach ensuring you feel supported whilst pursuing justice for endured hardships. Remember:

• Seek immediate medical attention post-incident – this aids case evidence and mitigates potential complications

• Photograph personal injuries – visuals are persuasive during negotiations or court hearings

• Secure witness information and report the incident timely to local animal control officers or police

Your path towards procuring rightful reparations need not be walked alone; allow our team at Carlson Bier to emancipate you from legal complexities following dangerous dog outrages. We thrive on channeling our collective proficiency into persistently advocating for victims’ rights under Illinois’ tight-knit legislative umbrella.

Suffering due to someone else’s negligence ignites feelings of injustice and compounds recovering pressures. Our determination at Carlson Bier parallels matching these inflictions with deserving restitution—a commitment illustrated consistently throughout our legal journey across Illinois.

You are urged to take advantage of our secure consultation platform by clicking the button found below. You may find solace in understanding the value ascribed to your case against incurred damages further prompting necessary steps towards recouping what’s rightfully yours—peace, serenity, unburdened existence alongside significant financial relief. Leave no stone unturned when fighting against such catastrophic events; explore how much your case could potentially be worth today with the seasoned guidance from Carlson Bier attorneys.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chenoa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chenoa

Areas of Practice in Chenoa

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing professional legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering adept legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents receive equitable compensation for hurts and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Offering adept legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in extending compassionate legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and skilled legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Expert in advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​