...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a damaging and traumatic dog bite injury in Chester, turn to Carlson Bier for exceptional legal guidance. Our experienced attorney team specializes in handling these distressing cases. With our vast knowledge of Illinois’s intricate dog bite laws and statutes, we meticulously navigate through complex litigation processes on your behalf. By rigorously pursuing justice for dog bite victims, we strive to alleviate the burden from your shoulders during this difficult time. Our strategic approach blends personalized attention with aggressive representation; ensuring that you receive full compensation for any medical bills, emotional trauma or loss of income incurred as a result of your case. Your recovery is paramount: let us champion your cause while you focus on healing and rehabilitation. Acclaim from grateful clients affirms that choosing the skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier reinforces peace-of-mind amid adversity—indeed solidifying trust with professionalism fused with empathetic touch makes daunting legal battles less intimidating at such times when client’s crave respite most genuinely!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chester Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and distress that can result from dog bite injuries. As a premier personal injury law firm in Illinois, we specialize in advocating for victims of such incidents and ensuring they receive just compensation for their pain, suffering, medical bills and more.

Dog bites can cause severe physical harm including puncture wounds, lacerations, broken bones or even infections such as rabies or tetanus. The emotional impact can also be substantial with victims potentially developing an ongoing fear of dogs or experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). If you’ve been subjected to a dog bite attack in Illinois, it’s crucial to seek immediate medical attention and legal advice.

Key points that should be taken into account with regards to dog bite injuries include:

– Liability: In many cases, the owner of the dog may be held legally responsible if their pet attacks someone. This holds true unless the victim was trespassing on private property or provoking the animal at the time of attack.

– Noticeability: A key component within liability is whether or not the owner was aware of their pet’s propensity for aggressive behavior. Evidence that shows previous aggressive encounters could form potent support for your case.

– Local laws: It is essential to familiarize yourself with local leash laws along with other requirements which may affect ownership responsibilities.

Through our expansive knowledge about personal injury law coupled with attentive client service, Carlson Bier offers robust representation to clients who have suffered dog bite injuries. Our diligent team will work tirelessly investigating your claim thoroughly – unravelling the facts surrounding your unfortunate incident along with gathering any available evidence that might help secure maximum compensation for you

Ultimately our priority lies in addressing all aspects pertaining dog bite claims – from collecting accurate police/animal control reports through obtaining relevant medical records; offering counsel during negotiations up till presenting compellingly at trial if needed.

Naturally dealing with aftermaths of a traumatizing event like a canine assault might be harrowing. But don’t worry, you are not alone on this journey to justice – at Carlson Bier, our personal injury lawyers in Illinois are here for you through every step of the legal process.

On top of being compassionate and dedicated advocates, we understand that experiencing dog bite injuries can place a tremendous financial burden on victims – complete with soaring medical expenses; potential loss of income and other related costs. This is why we operate essentially on a contingency basis – meaning that there will be no payment necessary unless we win your case.

No matter if you got hurt by an unrestrained pet while on a public place or encountered an aggressive canine within private premises where you were legally authorized to be; regardless of it being a minor wound or significant injury that resulted in long term issues or disfigurement– our attorney team possesses comprehensive expertise required to guide your path towards compensation recovery seamlessly.

Get in touch with us today for knowledgeable advice about your dog bite incident along with specificities regarding how these cases typically transpire in the state of Illinois. Whether your situation necessitates settling out-of-court or proceeding towards trial, we aim to pursue maximum compensation achievable under current laws while resonating strongly with your best interests.

Remember, getting proper legal counsel could mean the difference between unaddressed suffering and receiving appropriate restitution. By having skilled and experienced personal injury lawyers like those at Carlson Bier working on your side, you enhance chances for successful recourse substantially.

So why wait? Find out what steps could bring clarity amidst chaos stemming from painful canine attacks – get started now simply by clicking the button below. Discover right away how much worth does your case hold potentially with personalized feedback from professionals who truly care – at Carlson Bier – Your trusted personal injury allies!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chester

Areas of Practice in Chester

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering specialist legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Extending professional legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal support to victims affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Tumble Incidents

Expert in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents receive just remuneration for hurts and damages.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending specialist legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Focused on assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​