...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chicago Lawn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one has suffered due to dog bite injuries, the legal team at Carlson Bier is here to support your claims in Chicago Lawn. As professional personal injury lawyers based out of Illinois, we possess high expertise and understanding of local statutes concerning animal attack cases. We focus on representing victims who have faced trauma from dog bites, enabling them to secure fair compensation for their physical injuries as well as emotional and psychological distress. Notably, our record illustrates our exceptional ability to negotiate with insurance companies effectively; ensuring clients receive full entitlements without unnecessary delays. Our proficient attorneys provide comprehensive counseling throughout the process – reviewing case details meticulously, gathering requisite evidence and handling all litigation-related formalities making your recovery paramount above all else. Leverage the extensive experience that the Carlson Bier firm offers for tackling complex dog bite injury cases in Chicago Lawn – trust us – because we are committed to helping you seek justice seamlessly and uncompromisingly.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chicago Lawn Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a prominent personal injury law firm established in Illinois that specializes in diverse cases, including the intricate aspects of dog bite injuries. We understand that encountering a dog bite can be a distressing experience which can lead to both physical and psychological trauma. It becomes critical for victims to have access to accurate information about their rights and legal alternatives.

Dog bites violate almost every layer of the skin tissue causing considerable damage while also instigating an intensified risk of infection due to bacteria present in the dog’s saliva. The aftermath often encompasses medical expenses for treatment or plastic surgery, rehabilitative therapy, mental health counseling costs and wage losses during recovery – all detrimental factors affecting one’s quality of life.

Understanding your legal rights is paramount:

• You have the right to seek compensation if you were bitten by someone else’s dog without provocation.

• In Illinois, pet owners are held responsible for injuries caused by their pets irrespective of whether their pet had prior aggressive behavior or not.

• Documentation such as medical reports and photographs play a significant role in proving the extent of injuries sustained.

It is vital that you act swiftly following a dog bite incident. This means seeking immediate medical treatment, even if injuries initially seem minor. Documenting any changes this injury inflicts on your day-to-day activities validates your claim for compensation related to pain and suffering.

Every case bears its unique circumstances hence specialized legal advice often proves indispensable. At Carlson Bier, our high caliber attorneys possess substantial experience with personal injury laws specific to Illinois along with comprehensive knowledge about handling claims involving animal attacks like dog bites.

We believe winning a case involves developing deep understanding about each client; their lifestyle before incident, severity of injuries inflicted, financial implications encountered due their inability perform routine functions or loss wages from being unable work – this personalized approach ensures claiming maximum possible compensation on behalf our clients.”

Our team at Carlson Bier takes pride serving injured parties across different regions Illinois, steering them towards justice and helping them secure the maximum compensation they rightfully deserve. Pledging an unwavering commitment to fight for our client’s rights, we offer a free consultation to evaluate your case and educate you about this complex process.

We also understand that legal proceedings can often be daunting. Rest assured – we’re not here just to represent you – but also to guide and support you through each step of the way ensuring all your queries are answered in a manner easily understood even by non-lawyers.

Indeed handling dog bite cases require specialized knowledge, experience, and sensitivity – something that isn’t learned overnight. However, with Carlson Bier backing you up, success isn’t distant but merely a click away! Begin your journey towards securing a justified resolution by clicking on the button below.

Remember – Time is crucial as strict statutes of limitations apply! This allows us only limited time from date injury occurs pursue monetary damages behalf of victim; hence immediate action is mandatory. Explore how much your case could potentially be worth today because at Carlton Bier, every client matters – every case counts.

Get started now with Carlson Bier! After all, justice delayed is justice denied.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Chicago Lawn Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chicago Lawn

Areas of Practice in Chicago Lawn

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing specialist legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal advice for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering adept legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Stumble Injuries

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Collisions: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents gain just recompense for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Incident

Delivering expert legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Building Incidents

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in providing compassionate legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Committed to advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​