FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Chicago Lawn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with Medical Malpractice issues in Chicago Lawn, one seeks comprehensive advocacy of the highest caliber. On such occasions, Carlson Bier emerges as an outstanding choice. This firm has a sterling reputation for its unflagging dedication to championing the rights of patients who have been wronged by negligent medical practices or practitioners. Their zealous litigators utilize deep legal acumen combined with years of professional experience effectively and persistently on your behalf. Missing no detail and leaving no stone unturned, they delve into each case exhaustively while maintaining respectful communication at all stages of litigation process. They are committed not only to winning cases but ensuring their clients understand every aspect thereof – making what could be a daunting journey feel like a collaborative endeavor instead. Should you need trusted guidance through adversity arising from Medical Malpractice in Chicago Lawn; choose Carlson Bier – steadfast allies passionate about justice for victims of medical negligence beyond jurisdictional boundaries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Chicago Lawn Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of highly skilled and dedicated personal injury attorneys known for our unique approach to Medical Malpractice cases. Based in Illinois, we have built a solid reputation on holding healthcare professionals accountable for their negligence or mistakes that lead to patient suffering. Our chief commitment is to uphold the rights of victims affected by medical errors while providing top-quality legal representation.

If you’re unfamiliar with what constitutes as Medical Malpractice, it refers to a circumstance where patients are injured due to substandard care from medical practitioners, hospitals or other health care facilities. Such negligence can result into extensive range of physical and emotional trauma including inaccurate treatment, improper diagnosis, surgical errors, wrongful death among many others.

We believe every client deserves precise information relating to medical malpractice which will help them understand when they might be entitled to legal compensation. Hence,

• Proof of a doctor-patient relationship: A documented evidence affirming your interaction with the accused healthcare professional.

• Negligence was committed: The standard level of care that any competent doctor would have provided under similar circumstances contrasts with your experience.

• Direct connection between the negligence & injuries received: Proving that the harm suffered was solely due to the error caused by the practitioner.

• Specific damages were incurred: Confirmation of significant damage whether physical pain, mental agony, loss wages and/or hefty medical bills because of erroneous treatment is necessary before filing lawsuit.

The above variables carry considerable weightage in establishing a credible claim under Medical Malpractice law thereby securing entitlement which could include compensatory damages for actual loss; non economic damages pertaining to pain ,trauma suffered; punitive damages objectively designed at disciplining offender besides deriding repetitive behaviour.

Legal proceedings related to Medical Malpractice tend to get complicated because it requires intense understanding about procedural tactics as well regulatory standards practiced within Healthcare Industry while amassing critical evidences necessary towards fortifying clients stand . At Carlson Bier , we excel at undertaking these demanding measures due our exhaustive experience paired with in- depth understanding about intricacies of Medical Malpractices Laws within territory of Illinois . Our track record showcasing numerous successful representations stands proof towards this claim

At Carlson Bier, it’s not just about seeking justice; we aspire to present ourselves as a safety net that protects you from falling victim to procedural complexities and protecting your rights. With us, expect nothing but unwavering support and comprehensive guidance throughout the legal process.

In line with Illinois law, we wish to stipulate that our physical office is not located in Chicago Lawn area. Nevertheless, wherever you may be situated within Illinois state boundaries, rest assured—Carlson Bier’s unparalleled dedication and commitment will efficiently serve your cause.

Remember, awareness can be instrumental both for prevention as well claiming rightful compensation once afflicted! Therefore take actions towards arming yourself with required wisdom – which begins by click on button below! Thus enhancing potential chances at winning lawsuits while comprehensively understanding what worth does case hold. At Carlson Bier , decoding legality was never so effortless!!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chicago Lawn Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Chicago Lawn

Areas of Practice in Chicago Lawn

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Providing specialist legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing specialist legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Wounds

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for wounds and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering adept legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Building Incidents

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Committed to extending compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Committed to supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​