FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chicago Loop

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Based in Illinois, Carlson Bier is a distinguished law firm with profound expertise in handling personal injuries involving dog bite cases. Leveraging years of experience and nuanced understanding of laws pertaining to dog bite incidents, we dedicate ourselves to help victims navigate the complexities surrounding their case. We understand that no two incidents are alike; hence our team tailors an approach specific to your unique situation aiming for maximum compensation you rightly deserve.

Our services extend all across the state including Chicago Loop where unfortunate dog-bite incidents occur frequently. While not physically present in Chicago Loop, as per Illinois law, we’re determinedly committed towards its residents seeking justice following a distressing incident.

Why choose us? At Carlson Bier, our acute focus is on thorough investigation followed by strategic application of laws ensuring optimal results for you – our client.We don’t simply represent you; making it incumbent upon ourselves to become your ally amidst legal proceedings – because your peace of mind matters us!

Trust Carlson Bier when searching for comprehensive legal support concerning Dog Bite Injuries – irrespective of location boundaries!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chicago Loop Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your personal wellbeing and your rights are our priority. As a distinguished law firm located in Illinois, we offer dedicated legal services to victims of personal injury – providing special focus on dog bite injuries – one of the more predominant yet overlooked categories of serious personal harm.

In the unfortunate event that you or your loved ones have been victims of dog bite incidents, it is crucial to understand both the gravity and consequences associated with them. Dog bites pose not only immediate physical pain but also potential long-term psychological distress along with an array of possible infections. Rabies might be what immediately comes to mind; however, other bacteria such as Pasteurella and Capnocytophaga can induce considerable health issues if not promptly addressed.

Victims often require extensive medical treatment following a dog bite incident: stitches, possible reconstructive surgery for significant physical disfigurements and prompt measures taken against the risk of having contracted the previously mentioned bacterial afflictions. Prolonged rehabilitation procedures may be necessary as well in cases where nerve damage has occurred.

• Immediate medical attention: Any delay in seeking proper medical care could worsen injury complications.

• Documenting the Incident: This includes all relevant details about location, time, circumstances involving the dog at fault, witnesses etcetera.

• Reporting to local animal control offices: Helps ensure that corrective actions are undertaken towards preventing future incidents.

• Legal Assistance: Hiring knowledgeable legal experts like Carlson Bier will facilitate addressing punitive damages too under precise circumstances.

However severe your predicament after a vicious dog attack may seem—from mounting medical bills to lost wages due to inability to work—compensation should most definitely factor into these instances overridden by misconduct from negligent pet owners.

Our laws here in Illinois provide clear specifications regarding owner liability in these situations. In essence, any bites occurring unprovoked while you were conducting yourself peaceably in a location lawfully grants you direct entitlements under The Animal Control Act. In simple terms, this law dictates that the dog’s owner is fully responsible for all injuries caused by their pet under these circumstances.

However, negotiating potential intricacies around “provocation” in official legal parlance aren’t something you need to navigate along – our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier are proficiently equipped for that role. Partners Paul R. Carlson and Mary E. Bier with their combined 45 years of experience provide the acumen necessary for fighting your battles in the most resolute manner possible – ensuring the best chance at securing deserved compensation.

Here at Carlson Bier, we make it a point not merely to represent but rather educate and inform our clients as comprehensively as possible. We believe an informed client becomes an empowered client—capable of making sound decisions reflecting their best interests accurately throughout our shared legal journey.

It’s important to note certain specifics relating to owner liability when it comes to scenarios involving trespassers or professional veterinarians. The nature of both job titles implies acknowledged risk towards potential dog bites—an exception considered within statutory requirements determining claims eligibility.

Does your situation entail any regions grey on clarity? Are there questions boggling your mind about how rightful culpability gets determined in specific contexts? Or perhaps queries regarding particular nuances around precedents linked with awards assigned due justice while maintaining plaintiff rights? Rest assured knowing that we are here willing and ready to help enlighten those shadows!

At the end of every challenging day spent incessantly advocating on behalf of personal injury victims – illustrations pertaining especially towards unfortunate recipients from untamed canine aggression -serving up successful outcomes fuels us on dutifully delivering consistently promising results further.

Curious regarding what steps forward into realizing sizeable reimbursement entails considering these throes thrown your way amidst accidents spurred necessarily through unwarranted causal occurrences initiated via domesticated animals gone rogue? Don’t hesitate — click on the button below: unlock accurate assessment for gauging precise compensatory quantities resultant from circumstances unfolding like yours – personal injury disposals absolutely should not be taken lightly! Let us show you exactly how much your case is worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chicago Loop Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chicago Loop

Areas of Practice in Chicago Loop

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving professional legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, providing specialist legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Fall Injuries

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents get appropriate payout for wounds and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering adept legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to offering dedicated legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Committed to defending clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​