Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Chicago Loop

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a pedestrian accident occurs, it’s not just the physical harm that becomes burdensome; dealing with insurance companies and legal complexities can add to your stress. In such instances, turning to Carlson Bier, a respected personal injury law firm in Illinois, is your best bet. Clients from Chicago Loop particularly appreciate our knowledge of state laws regarding pedestrian accidents and our determination in ensuring justice prevails for our clients. Over many successful cases handled, we have proven time and again how dedicated we are about providing a formidable legal representation while adhering strictly to Illinois regulations on legal practice locations. Our team of seasoned attorneys staunchly advocates for deserved compensation by working meticulously on each aspect of your case. We understand the gravity associated with injuries sustained in pedestrian accidents – hence why your fight becomes ours too – because at Carlson Bier every client matters immensely! Choose us as your trusted ally during this strenuous journey towards rightful compensation; choose expertise born out of compassion and commitment!

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Chicago Loop Illinois

When circumstances clash with unexpected outcomes, the aftermath could be devastating and at times prove fatal. On public roads, for example, pedestrians often find themselves exposed to the relentless tidal wave of traffic mishaps. As top-tier Personal Injury Attorneys at Carlson Bier in Illinois, we understand that a pedestrian accident can result in both minor injuries as well as life-altering physical damages including traumatic brain injuries or spinal cord paralysis. Each injury has different legal implications that demand exclusive approaches for adequate representation and lawful compensation.

Our law firm’s primary goal is to make certain your rights are protected under the multifaceted Personal Injury Law terrain. This sphere of the legal ecosystem places a heavy emphasis on negligence by another party causing harm. In pedestrian accidents, this frequently implicates motorists who may not have been observing speed limits, keeping an eye out for crosswalks or respecting right-of-way rules. Therefore, determining liability forms one cornerstones of our practice when handling your case.

Importantly here are some crucial points worth underscoring:

– Every personal injury claim hinges on two things – Whether there was negligence and whether this negligence resulted in harm.

– It is critical to recognize all liable parties which may not always be apparent initially: from drivers and pedestrians themselves to even automobile manufacturers or governmental bodies over road design or maintenance.

– A successful compensation claim includes medical bills but also lost wages during recovery time, any permanent impairment/disability related costs and non-economic sufferings such as emotional distress.

In order to pioneer progress towards effective resolution, we will amass all possible evidence from the scene such as surveillance videos or eyewitness accounts; assess relevant police reports or medical records; work with specialists like accident reconstruction experts if necessary – all while comprehensively evaluating each instance individually merging competent legal counsel with genuine empathy derived from years of witnessing painful repercussions first-hand.

Every single case brings its unique challenges. However consistent within our methodical approach remains ensuring that every client feels heard, understood and supported throughout the process imbuing them with confidence as they entrust their situation to our knowledgeable team. Count on our demonstrated track record of delivering formidable legal representation that effectively fights for your rightful compensation.

As advocates committed to your well-being and rights post a pedestrian accident, we at Carlson Bier seek to alleviate some burdens – emotional, financial, physical – you or your loved ones may be grappling with. We dedicate ourselves relentlessly to ensure cases are handled swiftly so the injured party can focus on their recovery without worrying about bureaucracies or deadlines in this challenging period.

Yet another essential aspect surfaces when placing claims within Injury Law’s arena – time sensitivity; there is expiration termed as ‘Statute of Limitations’ within which one must lodge their claim else forfeit it forever. In Illinois this typically spans two years from your injury date but can vary depending on case specifics.

While navigating these complicated corridors seeking justice after a pedestrian accident, allow us at Carlson Bier championing your cause creating conducive conditions for successful resolution while striving towards maximum possible remuneration under the law. Our unwavering commitment honed through years serving countless clients makes us partners you need when confronting such adversities in life.

The prospect of calling an attorney might feel overwhelming: myriad questions certainly loom over such discussions like how much will my case fetch? Do I even have a solid case? Fortunately for you, this next step is only a click away. Below you’ll find a button that will guide you through an evaluation tool designed specifically with these questions in mind. Go ahead – take control back into your hands today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chicago Loop Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Chicago Loop

Areas of Practice in Chicago Loop

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing professional legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents receive fair payout for wounds and losses.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing experienced legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in delivering dedicated legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Focused on assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer