...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chillicothe

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a canine’s aggressive encounter results in trauma, Carlson Bier is the law firm to navigate you through Illinois’ complex dog bite injury laws. Offering comprehensive legal support for residents contending with dog bite injuries, we are poised and ready to bring justice to your claim. With specialized skills in interpreting state statutes flawlessly, our team proficiently pursues compensation covering medical costs, pain and emotional anguish associated with this harrowing experience. Our careful approach ensures your rights as the victim are not undermined due to loopholes or legalese complexities potentially favoring reckless pet owners. Valued for their assertive negotiating strategies coupled with formidable courtroom presence, these lawyers consistently secure favorable outcomes for clients coping with severe canine-inflicted wounds. At Carlson Bier, we believe that victims should concentrate on healing while entrusting all legal challenges of their case diligently at our adept hands! Pursue justice confidently after a distressing animal attack by partnering with us;trust that we will guide you towards ultimate relief from an arduous ordeal.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chillicothe Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our seasoned personal injury attorneys understand that suffering a dog bite can be an emotionally distressing and physically painful experience. Furthermore, it’s not just the injury itself; victims of dog bites often face bewildering medical bills, loss of income if they’re unable to work, and can even suffer psychological trauma long after their physical wounds have healed. As Illinois-based lawyers with significant experience in handling animal attack claims, we are here to fight for your entitlements and advocate for you when you need it most.

Dog-bite injuries encompass more than mere bites or scratches. They include fractures from being knocked down by a larger animal, infections from untreated or incorrectly treated wounds, emotional trauma – particularly plaguing children who may have been attacked – inability to use wounded limbs effectively, among other afflictions. The ripple effect can be overwhelming and disorientating which shouldn’t be managed alone.

An important fact is that Illinois operates under a ‘Strict Liability’ dog bite law – this means owners are held accountable for an unprovoked attack regardless if they had previous knowledge of their dog’s aggressive behavior. Under this statute:

• Dog-owners are strictly responsible for any injuries their pets cause

• Proving negligence on the owner’s part is not required

• The scenario must involve a real domesticated dog (canine), not another type of domesticated pet

With these facets implemented in every case, it begs the question – how does one navigate through such complexities? At Carlson Bier we simplify this journey ensuring efficiency coupled with compassionate service aiming at guaranteed satisfaction.

If you’ve been bitten by a dog in Illinois but uncertain about questions like ‘Do I qualify for compensation?’ or ‘How much can I claim?’, remember these key aspects:

• Your legal rights do exist even if the dog belongs to a family member or friend

• Medical expenses linked with the incident should ideally be covered by the owner’s insurer

• Compensation includes not only the medical bills but also loss of earnings, out-of-pocket expenses and damages for pain and suffering

Take your first step towards obtaining a rightful compensation by consulting with Carlson Bier – our sensible and practical approach blazed with aggressive representation guarantees optimum outcomes. Armed with extensive experience in Illinois dog bite cases, our team understand the nuisances associated with procuring maximum benefits that you deserve.

It is critical to acknowledge that each scenario is not identical thus comprehensive individual analysis is vital. Tailoring our strategy according to unique circumstances ensures we efficiently resolve legal matters empowering our clients getting them back on track without delay.

If you’re considering pursuing a claim following a dog bite injury, it’s essential to gather evidence promptly. This can involve doing things such as taking photographs of your injuries, saving any clothing damaged during the event and notifying local law enforcement authorities so they can make an official record of the incident validated by their neutral standpoint eventually utilized for convincing argumentation at court proceedings if necessary.

At Carlson Bier, we are invested in every phase from assorted documentation right up to strenuous negotiation or trial further securing justice accompanied by monetary relief ensuring none suffer unduly due to other’s carelessness especially when it involves unpredictable domestic pets like dogs.

Boundless queries about Dog Bite Injuries? Or worried about procuring justified remuneration after enduring traumatic distress caused by negligent owners? Gently click on the button below for answers along with precise estimation concerning your case value effortlessly calibrated using renowned evaluative techniques perfected over years authenticating legitimacy enhancing successful chances exponentially- because at Carlson Bier we believe in delivering promises while showcasing adept expertise honed deploying lifelong commitment. Claim what’s rightfully yours now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chillicothe Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chillicothe

Areas of Practice in Chillicothe

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing adept legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Extending dedicated legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Slip Accidents

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents secure fair payout for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Providing adept legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Committed to offering expert legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Focused on defending persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​