...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Chrisman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bite injuries are traumatizing experiences. The aftermath can be physically and emotionally draining, leaving you with mounting medical bills and lost wages due to missed workdays. When in this plight, you need an adept attorney who will fight tirelessly for your rightful compensation- that’s where Carlson Bier comes in. Our law firm specializes in dog bite injuries, based right here in Illinois – providing dedicated counsel tailored to serve the needs of Chrisman residents involved in dog attack incidents. We understand all complexities related to such cases under Illinois law, enabling us to aggressively advocate for our clients’ interests throughout litigation or settlement negotiations. With a track record marked by numerous triumphant verdicts and worry-free settlements on behalf of our clients within Chrisman vicinity—and the rest of Illinois—we anchor each case on meticulous investigation coupled with compassionate legal assistance which has built us an unmatched reputation among those seeking justice after a mishap as sensitive as a canine assault incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Chrisman Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier—a leading personal injury attorney group based in Illinois that specializes in Dog Bite Injuries. We understand the fear, physical pain and psychological trauma that dog bite victims go through. Our dedicated team is here to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve for your injuries and distress.

Dog bites can result in severe implications, with violations ranged from actual physical harm to serious infections such as rabies. Young children are especially vulnerable due to their smaller size and lack of understanding about the potential danger a pet may pose. To help clarify, we’ve listed specific key aspects that influence personal injury cases related to dog bites:

• Liability: The owner is held liable if they failed to control the aggressive behavior of their dog.

• Negligence: If an attack happens due to carelessness or willful ignorance on behalf of the keeper.

Understanding these points can empower you—impacting how effective your claim turns out.

At Carlson Bier, our approach focuses on thoroughly assessing every detail pertinent to your situation—enabling us not only to develop groundbreaking strategies but also strongly present your case—best positioning you for successful results.

We take great pride in our ability to empathize with our clients’ situations; each case is treated with unmatched level of dedication and commitment—the very essence defining who Carlson Bier is. We strive towards putting this traumatic experience behind you as quickly as possible while pursuing maximum possible recovery on your behalf—the two critical components transforming a painful episode into re gained strength and restored tranquility.

Over time, we have consistently delivered high-quality representation for all types of personal injury cases—and specifically—as unparalleled experts when it comes down to handling dog bite incidents occurring throughout Illinois State—we do NOT however own any physical offices outside state bounds—it’s unlawful per Illinois’ law constitution.

Our long-standing reputation attests supreme professionalism, comprehensive knowledge, unrivaled legal insight combined with robust client-oriented service capable of reassuring even most reluctant individuals—that they are in safe hands when becoming part of Carlson Bier’s clientele.

We build our working patronage around core values: Respect, Integrity, Communication and Excellence. As your legal representatives, we promise to always keep you informed about the progress of your case—we work collaboratively—strategizing, planning and executing meticulously-structured roadmaps specifically designed to win over highest possible compensation for injuries sustained during an unfortunate incident as a dog bite.

Look no further than Carlson Bier if you or your loved ones have been bitten by a dog. We know that understanding the law can be overwhelming; we aim to lift that burden from your shoulders so you could focus on what really matters most – healing and recovery.

Want to take the guesswork out of figuring out how much your case might be worth? While every situation is different and specific award amounts cannot be predicted, we invite you to explore with us how much potential compensation could come across in generic terms—connect with us today—let’s navigate through this journey together—one where knowledge gets power, expertise wins credibility but it all starts from here—with just one click—the ‘button below.’

Find yourself often wondering “what my dog bite injury claim may add up?” Don’t sit pondering any longer—uncertainty can oftentimes be quite disheartening—but not anymore. Click on the button below—dive deep into possibilities that potentially await following expert-level representation courtesy of Carlson Bier—a leading personal injury attorney group based in Illinois specializing particularly in Dog Bite Injuries. Let’s find out together how much your case could possibly be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chrisman Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Chrisman

Areas of Practice in Chrisman

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying specialist legal advice for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring dedicated legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Stumble Incidents

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Offering legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents get just compensation for wounds and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering professional legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in offering professional legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Focused on representing victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​