...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Christopher

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the event of unfortunate circumstances, such as dog bite injuries in Christopher, Carlson Bier is a leading law firm providing unparalleled legal services. Our extensive experience coupled with our deep understanding of personal injury law fortifies us to achieve outstanding results for our clients in handling dog bite or animal attack cases. Dog bites can lead severe physical trauma and emotional distress which warrant serious consideration under the umbrella of personal injury law. When you choose Carlson Bier, we work relentlessly to ensure your rights are fiercely advocated for and that justice is served thoroughly. Our team combines aggressive strategies curated with Illinois legislature nuances endorsing effective resolutions for victims suffering from dog bite injuries. We delineate the complexities associated with these cases pushing towards maximized compensation so your healing process remains unconstrained by financial burdens or legality intricacies resulting from such incidents. High-quality representation is synonymous to choosing Carlson Bier when seeking assistance for any kind of dog bite-related matter in Christopher—handling every case uniquely while delivering personalized attention benefiting each client’s situation proves us best against all parameters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Christopher Illinois

Every year in Illinois, hundreds of residents suffer from dog bite injuries; incidents that aren’t only painful but sometimes come with debilitating consequences. At Carlson Bier, we leverage an incredible wealth of legal experience to assist victims of such unfortunate encounters seek rightful compensation. We’re well-versed in the nuances of personal injury laws and will deploy every viable strategy to ensure that justice prevails for you.

Understanding your rights as a victim is paramount when dealing with a dog bite issue. The first critical point to note is that dog owners in Illinois are held liable if their pet bites or attacks someone – this falls under ‘strict liability’. This implies regardless of whether the owner knew about the animal’s propensity for violence or not; they can still be brought to account legally for any bodily harm or property damage caused by their pet.

We also want you to comprehend some distinctive facts related to Dog Bite Injury Laws.

• Your claim remains steadfast even if the incident occurred on either private property—the home of the dog owner—or public places like parks provided you had lawful entry onto that property.

• Strict liability does not only apply when there’s physical contact with a biting dog; it extends to cases where a menacing canine indirectly contributed to your accident e.g., causing you fall down while running away from it.

• Filing a lawsuit doesn’t require proof that negligence led to the attack. In essence, merely illustrating injury occurrence is enough ground under strict liability law.

Venturing into worthy steps after experiencing such terrifying occurrences is equally significant. The immediate action should always entail obtaining proper medical care—beyond treating your external wounds accurately, documenting all medical procedures plays an immense role as convincing evidence in court trials. It would help further if one could gather photos or videos directly related to the incident scene inclusive capturing the offending animal if possible.

Being represented by an astute law firm matters profoundly too – paying attention here at Carlson Bier means taking advantage of our highly acknowledged negotiation skills and formidable litigation dexterity. We ascertain that our clients get fair insurance settlements through diligent dealings that capitalize on ensuring maximum compensation.

We’re conscious of the emotional turmoil, medical bills, loss of wages—especially for self-employed or casually employed victims—and on severe occasions permanent physical disfigurement that you may have encountered following an incident. Our goal thereby remains to provide a throb-free legal path dedicated to recovering all these damages in the fullest extent possible.

At Carlson Bier , we practice law with a formidable heart at its core -the heart that tirelessly battles against concealment of justice for dog bite victims like you. By choosing us as your legal representation, you shall benefit notably from our hands-on approach which involves personalized service delivery tailored explicitly to match your case’s unique needs. And it’s seen from decades-long operations making us one of Illinois’ top-rated personal injury law firms handling various personal injury cases inclusive of Dog Bite injuries.

Carrying affliction after a nasty dog bite should not be an option! Explore the possibility to reverse this unfortunate fate by clicking on the button below. Essential compensation might just be a stride away—a bold step into freeing yourself; passionately unwinding the cruel trepidity and replenishing lost hope towards achieving your rightful settlement claim.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Christopher Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Christopher

Areas of Practice in Christopher

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing skilled legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing expert legal services to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Fall Incidents

Skilled in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding clients of car accidents gain just compensation for harms and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Offering professional legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring professional legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Expert in defending persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​