...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cisne

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, navigating the tricky waters toward a successful claim can be daunting. Carlson Bier specializes in this area, providing expert advocacy rooted in years of practice within Illinois’ legal framework. Understanding that each case is unique with its own specific circumstances, we strive to secure maximum compensation for our clients. Over time,we have mastered laws related to dog bites and their consequent injuries,a testament backed by an impressive track-record of winning cases or securing favorable settlements for those adversely affected by such incidents.Nonetheless,Cisne citizens deserve top-notch representation too.By working closely with you throughout every stage of your claim process, we ensure personalized service tailored to fit your situation.Our genuine commitment towards justice ensures that regrettable events don’t break important life strides.We pride ourselves as being part-time educators; simplifying complex jargons,your rights,duties and expectations into digestible pieces.From aggressive litigation approach,to searing cross examination skills before a jury if need arises-think Carlson Bier.Your dependable partner,is just one consultation away,in representing dog bite victims across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cisne Illinois

In the realm of personal injury law, Carlson Bier embodies a team of astute litigators known for their dedicated advocacy and high standards of service. Based in Illinois, we bring particular expertise to cases related to dog bite injuries — an overlooked but serious problem that can cause grievous harm both physically and emotionally. Through this page, we strive to provide valuable insights about dog bites injuries that would enable our readers to understand its legal ramifications better and subsequently make informed decisions.

Dog bites can result in a spectrum of severe physical injuries which may include puncture wounds, nerve damage, fractured bones or significant facial injury. These incidents may also lead to emotional trauma with long-term implications like distress, fear, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). If you’re facing such a situation due to the negligence or irresponsibility of another party such as a pet owner, it’s essential to know your rights under Illinois’ personal injury laws.

• Strict Liability Rule: Illinois follows the strict liability rule when it comes to dog bites, meaning you are not required to prove that the dog owner was careless. As long as you were bitten without provoking the dog and while legally on public or private property where the bite occurred—you are entitled to compensation.

• Damages You Can Recover: The compensations awarded include medical expenses associated with treating injuries from the bite; loss of income if you’ve been unable to work; future lost wages if scarring or disability from your wound prevents future employment; mental suffering including PTSD; costs for plastic surgery if needed due to scarring.

Moreover, unlike many states where ‘one free bite’ rule applies—meaning owners get exempted from liability if their pet has never shown aggression before—Illinois holds pet owners liable even if their animal has no previous history of violent behavior. This underscores why it’s essential not just knowing these laws exist but understanding how they apply uniquely within our state lines.

While involved in a dog bite case, ensuring the accurate evaluation of its worth is critical. This would include due consideration to medical costs, psychological trauma, lost wages and future care needs—all these parameters often call for expert interpretation. Carlson Bier takes pride in offering distinct capabilities to meticulously gauge that value and advocate it convincingly. Moreover, our association with leading medical experts aids us significantly in evidencing the severity of injuries.

At this point, you might be considering if pursuing a claim for your dog bite injury is worth it or feeling overwhelmed by all legal procedures; that’s why we are here to serve as your guide through this stressful experience. With decades of collective experience under our belt specializing in handling dog bite cases—one thing we can say definitively: no two situations are alike. And thus every solution requires personalized attention, raising the importance of an initial detailed consultation.

In an era embedded with complex legal jargon— providing information on personal injury law related to dog bites that’s easily digestible and useful has been at heart when creating this content. We hope you find significant insight within these lines grounded on factual context and empathy towards those affected.

So, now what? If you were unfortunately injured by someone else’s pet—you’re only one step away from discovering how much compensation your case may yield in Illinois. Remembering that victims can seek restitution even when dogs have never shown aggression before should give you confidence moving forward—but don’t feel you need to navigate these choppy legal waters alone.

We invite you to click below—to begin evaluating the true worth of your unique situation—with trusted partners who genuinely care about delivering justice where it’s due while guiding you through each step patiently.

Take advantage of our deep understanding of personal injury laws connected with dog bites so we can turn that into tangible benefits—a path towards healing with adequate compensation made achievable for anyone seeking rightful redress after such traumatizing incidents—with Carlson Bier standing right beside you.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cisne Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cisne

Areas of Practice in Cisne

Bike Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending expert legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking recovery for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents get equitable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Crash

Offering adept legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in providing compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Expert in defending victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​