...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Clarendon Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be traumatizing, and battling for fair compensation adds to the stress. At Carlson Bier, we understand this predicament. Being renowned personal injury lawyers in Illinois, our dedication is to ensure victims of dog bites get the justice they deserve. With years of experience in dealing with these sorts of cases around Clarendon Hills area, we are proficient at cutting through complex legalities that might seem overwhelming to individuals facing such daunting circumstances by themselves. Our firm’s expertise includes clarifying Illinois dog bite laws and attending meticulously to every detail of your claim – preserving evidence and advocating tirelessly on your behalf with insurance companies or courts if needed. Providing top-tier representation for dog-related injuries, Carlson Bier’s results-oriented approach exemplifies why victims turn towards us while navigating these challenging times; leveraging unmatched competence as guideposts toward reclaiming their peace of mind alongside suitable damages incurred due to other’s negligence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Clarendon Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases, providing relentless representation for victims of various accidents, including dog bite injuries. As experienced attorneys based in Illinois, we understand the severity and trauma associated with these incidents. Dog bites can wreak havoc not only physically but mentally too. The cost of medical treatment and psychological healing can be dauntingly high.

As professionals who are firmly rooted in the realm of personal injury law, our main goal is to protect your rights and guarantee you receive full compensation for the hardships you have suffered due to a dog bite incident. Dog owners are held accountable under Illinois laws for any injuries their pets cause unless the victim was trespassing or provoking the animal intentionally.

A few key points about California’s dog bit injury law include:

• Strict liability applies

• Claims must be made within two years from the accident

• Possible defenses against claims include provocation and trespassing

After being involved in a canine attack, it is essential that one follows several necessary steps to ensure legal justice is served without hindrance. These factors form an integral aspect of our counsel at Carlson Bier:

– Seek immediate medical attention.

– Report the incident immediately to local authorities.

– Gather evidence – Photographs of your wounds, eyewitness contacts & accounts.

– Consult a professional attorney immediately.

Once you have followed through with those crucial steps after suffering a dog bite incident, partnering with our determined team at Carlson Bier will streamline your journey towards fair compensation. Our seasoned lawyers spearhead investigations diligently to collect vital evidence while collaborating closely with healthcare providers so they can ascertain accurate estimations regarding your accrued medical expenses as well as future costs allied with rehabilitation and therapy sessions.

Our team also explores compensatory measures regarding non-economic damages like pain and suffering caused by PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), anxiety disorders, depression symptoms leading from traumatic events such as nightmares or flashbacks associated with the horrifying incident – all of which are unfortunately common victims of dog bite injuries.

Above all, we are dedicated to providing substantial value for our clients via diligent representation and a comprehensive understanding of personal injury law in Illinois. We work tirelessly, mounting a powerful case on your behalf while you focus on optimizing your physical and mental recovery.

A key thing to remember is that the filing period for dog bite injury cases in Illinois is within two years from the date of when the incident took place; any late filings will not be regarded valid under state law. While this might seem like plentiful time at first glance, given the intricate nature related to these cases like accumulating medical records, gathering compelling evidence and negotiating with uncooperative insurance companies – acting swiftly and wisely by involving an experienced attorney early can make all difference between achieving a fair settlement or walking away empty-handed.

Understandably, estimating how much one could potentially receive as compensation following such distressing times can be confusing due to variations dependent upon individual circumstances surrounding each case. That’s why our expert evaluations regarding potential claim worths have been beneficial towards countless satisfied Carlson Bier clientele over many decades now enabling them envision brighter futures ahead once again amidst adversities they never saw coming their way.

Interested in finding out how much your dog bite injury claim could possibly total up? Simply click on the button below right now to start reclaiming control back over life with us standing strongly besides you every step taken towards attaining rightful justice denied thus far!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Clarendon Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Clarendon Hills

Areas of Practice in Clarendon Hills

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending expert legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Misconduct

Providing specialist legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Fall Accidents

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on assisting sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate payout for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Extending experienced legal advice for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in defending persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​