FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Clearing

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from a dog bite injury in Clearing, Carlson Bier is the legal ally you need. With an impressive track record in personal injury cases, our firm specializes in litigating dog bite injuries. Our expertise stems from comprehensive understanding of Illinois’ specific laws and regulations regarding such incidents. We passionately represent victims seeking justice and compensation for pain, loss of wages, medical costs or even emotional trauma incurred due to these devastating accidents. Choosing Carlson Bier equates to choosing tenacious advocacy committed to achieving the best possible outcomes for clients. As we navigate your case with skillful diligence and compelling argumentation, we keep compassion at the fore – aware that behind every claim there’s a person dealing with circumstances they didn’t ask for nor deserve. Reach out today; let us turn this challenging chapter into an opportunity for recovery and restitution.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Clearing Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to understanding the complex aspects of personal injury law. This includes a keen focus on cases involving dog bite injuries – an area that often leaves victims with not just physical traumas but emotional scars as well. Our robust legal team is based in Illinois and is equipped with the knowledge and experience necessary to navigatively guide you through your recovery journey.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries, such as lacerations, punctures, infection, nerve damage or even psychological harm like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Here at Carlson Bier law firm, we firmly believe that if you or a loved one has been injured due to a dog bite incident, you have every right to seek justice.

Educating yourself about the potential implications surrounding dog bite incidents can be invaluable. The following key points cover some essential aspects regarding this matter:

• Depth of knowledge: Understanding the specific breed-related legislation in Illinois can add weightage towards building your case successfully.

• Strict Liability: Illinois implements strict liability laws for all animal attack cases implying owners are held liable regardless of the animal’s past behavior.

• Statute of Limitations: Victims generally have two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit.

• Damages recoverable: Medical expenses, Lost wages due to missed work time, Pain and suffering inflicted by the attack could be recovered.

Our attorneys prioritize taking their learned insights about these particular legalities into account. In doing so they represent your interests passionately within Illinois’ legal framework specifically related to personal injury claims arising from dog bite incidents.

Carlson Bier invites clients throughout Illinois who’ve suffered pain and loss as a result of negligent pet owners’ actions. Whether it’s facilitating negotiations with insurance companies or unwaveringly representing your rights in court; when dealing with our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier Law Firm – expect absolute dedication attached with utmost compassion towards addressing your legitimate concerns.

We understand the life-altering effects a dog bite injury might have on your and your family’s life, let us be your prominent advocate in this fight. Our commitment lies in securing rightful compensation for all our clients impacted by these incidents; we aim to ease burdens you face because of another’s neglect.

In handling personal injury cases related to dog bites, our attorneys apply a highly personalized approach. We analyze each detail about the attack incident, document all injuries incurred accurately and methodically establish a straightforward case designed at obtaining maximum financial reparation for you.

Trust is vital when engaging an attorney. Our testimonials reflect past resolutions we’ve won for our clients personally burdened with dog bite injuries across Illinois – regardless of any situation severity levels involved. Explore these stories if you wish to understand better how deeply we uphold professionalism alongside possessing significant knowledge required specifically within this legal arena.

Deciding what action to take after enduring such trauma can feel overwhelming indeed, Carlson Bier is here to mitigate those concerns with definitive guidance legally justified under Illinois’ robust law pertaining to animal attacks like dog bites.

Our lawyers offer customized solutions acknowledging that no two cases are alike – just as no two injuries (or interpretations thereof) mirror exactly either. We’re available 24/7 to hear about what happened, answer any questions you may have concerning liability laws specific towards dog owners based primarily in Illinois or otherwise advise where needed during initial consultations absolutely free of charge.

Finally as a powerful reminder: evidence generally dissipates over time following a dog bite incident but memories associated merely enhance traumas endured. Click below without further delay – find out how much your case could be worth right away! Remember only by initiating action today will justice be served tomorrow; don’t lose precious time negotiating claims uncertainties yourself when dedicated professionals from Carlson Bier Law Firm are ever-ready comprehensively easing the process entirely onto their experienced shoulders instead.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Clearing Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Clearing

Areas of Practice in Clearing

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing adept legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring expert legal representation for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents gain fair compensation for harms and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Trucking Accident

Extending expert legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Building Accidents

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Injuries

Specializing in providing professional legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Trauma

Committed to supporting individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440