...

Personal Injury Attorney in Clearing

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to personal injury cases, the law firm of Carlson Bier stands in a league of its own. Trusted throughout Illinois, they are revered for their comprehensive understanding and vast experience. Their services radiate excellence because your wellbeing is paramount to them; hence they judiciously handle every case with absolute dedication ensuring optimal results. Extensively versed across varying degrees of accidents – car crashes, work-related injuries or wrongful death claims – their prowess leads the charge towards justice. Their attorneys empathize personally with each client’s pain and dignify you as more than just another case number but an individual whose peace of mind matters deeply to them. They remain unyieldingly committed until deserving settlement is secured; your victory remains the litmus test for their performance benchmarking metrics! Hence if you seek relentless representation in Clearing and beyond that ensures swift justice while upholding humaneness at its core, consider engaging with Carlson Bier- Personal Injury attorneys prolonging a legacy of unwavering trustworthiness coupled with deft legal expertise.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Clearing Illinois

Welcome to the official webpage of Carlson Bier, your reliable personal injury attorney group in Illinois. Our personal injury attorneys provide legal services with a specialization in personal injury law. With years of professional experience under our belts, we guide our clients through their complex cases, helping them understand every vital aspect involved.

Personal Injury law covers instances where an individual’s body or mind is hurt, usually due to someone else’s negligence or careless actions. A wide range of incidents can fall under this category from automotive accidents and medical malpractice to wrongful death and product liability cases. Understanding the niche details of this field can often be complicated but having access to the right knowledge and experienced attorneys greatly aids one’s path towards understanding.

Several key aspects are instrumental in determining how Personal Injury law applies to specific situations:

• Identifying if negligence was involved: This plays a central role as it pinpoints the party responsible for any harm caused.

• Defining damages: Tangible (like medical costs) and intangible (such as pain and suffering ) economic losses are evaluated here under this banner.

• Statute of limitations: Every state has specific time limits, within which a lawsuit must be filed following an accident or injury.

• Comparative Fault: Some states follow comparative fault rules where injured people could recover damages even when they are partially at fault.

Our team at Carlson Bier boasts committed attorneys who will discuss these concepts comprehensively with you while bringing clarity on other potential complications as well. Each case requires personalized attention – tailoring strategies toward achieving favorable results becomes our foremost priority without disregarding your comfort level throughout proceedings.

There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach while dealing with Personal Injury lawsuits; hence each claim varies regarding its worth. Many factors figure into calculating a definitive value such as severity & duration of injuries, impacting daily life activities conjoined with financial hardships faced like loss wages, piling medical bills among others. However, knowing precisely what your claim might potentially be worth can be challenging without professional help. Yet, our experienced attorneys work meticulously in offering correct evaluations encompassing all potential elements contributing towards your case’s value.

Now that you understand the basics of Personal Injury law and what to expect while dealing with such cases, it is crucial to choose a legal team equipped expressly for your needs. Carlson Bier prides itself on its diligence, professionalism and dedication offered to each client individually. Genuine care weighs equally as much as thorough knowledge regarding personal injury laws, and our firm embodies this sentiment at heart.

Leaps of faith are not required when choosing us since we believe in absolute transparency while demonstrating a stellar track record cutting across numerous personal injury lawsuits in Illinois which speak volumes about our expertise. We commit ourselves to strive relentlessly towards securing the compensation you rightfully deserve and will stand by you throughout the journey guiding every step taken.

Your story deserves attention; allow us to help voice it effectively through comprehensive legal representation aimed at safeguarding your best interests thoroughly coupled with unwavering compassion marking every interaction held with us.

If you’re ready to analyze how much your case could possibly be worth tangibly or if there are lingering queries still remaining concerning personal injury laws underlining proceedings, don’t hesitate further. Click on the button below to arrange for an initial consultation meeting with one of our expert attorneys who will offer assistance catered exclusively for you based on their wealth of practical experience and sound legal acumen.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Clearing Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Clearing

Areas of Practice in Clearing

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending adept legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering experienced legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Adept in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents receive just remuneration for wounds and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Semi Collision

Offering specialist legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Construction Accidents

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Traumas

Focused on extending professional legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer