Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Clifton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury can be both physically debilitating and financially destructive. When grappling with the long-term implications of such injuries, having effective representation is critical. Carlson Bier serves as a beacon for those devastated by severe personal harm, particularly spinal cord injuries. Their legacy in Illinois is built on steady determination to champion the rights of clients who’ve suffered devastating health setbacks and to help secure rightful compensation for their immense challenges.

With deep legal acumen fortified over years, along with meticulous attention to detail and sensitivity towards personal hardships faced by clients, these cornerstones drive excellence at Carlson Bier. Skilled navigation through complex legal processes places them above other law firms when it comes to handling intricate litigation surrounding spinal cord injuries.

Moreover, they have been staunch advocates in fostering a significant change in attitude toward individuals with spinal cord impairment through their work within Illinois’s law landscape. Entrusting your case into the hands of Carlson Bier ultimately means entrusting yourself onto pioneering leaders in this field – truly transforming lives one courtroom victory at a time around Clifton city lines.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Clifton Illinois

An unfortunate accident can change life’s trajectory in an instant, leading to both physical and emotional trauma. As a personal injury attorney group, Carlson Bier deeply comprehends that spinal cord injuries are among the most severe consequences of these accidents. Offering our services throughout Illinois, we understand the financial implications, medical complications and lifestyle changes associated with these injuries. We have dedicated ourselves to vehemently pursuing justice for clients dealing with spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries typically result from traumatic events such as vehicle collisions, falls or sports mishaps. Such incidents may disrupt nerve signals along the spinal cord pathway resulting in partial or complete loss of strength, sensation or motor function below the level of injury— a condition known as paralysis. The severity will usually correspond with your accident’s nature; often characterized as either incomplete (partial functionality retained) or complete (no sensory or motor function preserved).

Recognizing early signs is critical:

• Loss of movement

• Altered sensation: inability to perceive heat, cold and touch

• Loss of bowel or bladder control

• Changed sexual functioning

Apart from the immediate physical impairment that accompanies a spinal chord injury, other less tangible yet significant challenges exist – adjustment to reduced mobility, potential reconfiguration of living space for accessibility and psychological distress coping with this new reality.

In Illinois you’re entitled by law to seek compensation if your injury was due to another’s negligence but knowing how much your case is worth depends on several factors:

– Medical bills: These can include surgery costs, medication expenses and charges concerning rehabilitation therapy.

– Income lost due to inability to work post-injury.

– Pain and suffering endured alongside decreased quality of life.

– Future needs including ongoing health care provisions plus modifications required at home for newly imposed limitations.

With each case unique in its dynamics – assessments differ greatly – hence professional guidance proves key in ensuring a successful claim.

At Carlson Bier we specialize not merely through legally representing you but also offering financial and emotional support through what can be a highly tumultuous period. Right from the outset, we work with you to understand your case intricacies, potential pitfalls within legal proceedings and ultimately ensure maximum monetary recuperation for incurred losses. Your well-being is our ultimate motivation – even as we painstakingly navigate the complexities of Illinois personal injury law on your behalf.

What sets us apart, however, is not only our expertise but also our commitment to making our client feel heard and understood throughout this emotionally straining process. Suffering from back injuries ourselves or knowing close friends who have experienced similar traumas – this firm isn’t just devoted professionally to spinal cord injuries but it’s something that is additionally close to heart.

From providing advice regarding immediate medical care decisions post-accident to conducting comprehensive investigations into incidents – we are there at every step in the journey towards recovery. Our commitment goes beyond courts rights into ensuring your long-term health by collaborating closely with specialists in spinal cord injury rehabilitation across Illinois.

Navigating life after a serious injury can indeed be daunting; one filled with moments of uncertainty about what lies ahead – but you don’t have to walk this path alone. As Carlson Bier – experienced personal injury attorneys in Illinois, let us guide you each toddling step towards securing compensation that will help regain control over your life again.

Ultimately, illuminating clients about their entitled rights and potential compensatory avenues forms this website’s crux while concurrently serving as an informational resource about spinal cord injuries. So why wait? Reach out and contact us today! On clicking the button below find out how much exactly your case could be worth as the first crucial step towards justice. Remember, together we’re stronger against those negligent actions that took away parts of your mobility – together we fight for what’s fair!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Clifton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Clifton

Areas of Practice in Clifton

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering expert legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering experienced legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Trip Incidents

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents gain reasonable payout for damages and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Accident

Providing adept legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in delivering specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Committed to advocating for clients with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer