...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Clinton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Clinton and grappling with the aftermath of a dog bite injury, consider enlisting professional representation from Carlson Bier. Holding a solid reputation across Illinois, this law firm specializes in personal injuries such as dog bite incidents. They boast deep understanding of the prevalent laws surrounding these cases and have an impressive track record in securing full compensation for their clients’ harm and suffering. Rely on Carlson Bier’s vast experience to navigate complex injury claims skillfully so that justice may be served promptly for those affected by canine-inflicted damages. Their tactful approach differentiates each case strategy according to client circumstances – ensuring optimal outcomes every time! The proficient team at Carlson Bier is equipped with effective resources for top-level legal service quality catering uniquely to your situation throughout this difficult journey towards recovery. Remember, when unforeseen misfortunes strike causing serious harm – like devastating dog attacks – trust none other than the experts at Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Clinton Illinois

When the unexpected occurs, such as suffering from a dog bite injury, you need an experienced and dedicated legal ally to turn to. That’s why we’re here at Carlson Bier, Illinois’ trusted personal injury law firm. We understand the physical, emotional, and financial implications of dog bite injuries and are committed to championing your rights by delivering personalized service coupled with unabridged legal expertise.

Dog bite injuries are more common than many people realize. They can result in considerable medical treatment needs that may include stitches, antibiotics, rabies vaccinations or even plastic surgery in severe cases. In addition to the immediate health impacts inflicted by these incidents, individuals often face psychological trauma and potentially long-term complications such as scarring and infection which can drastically shift their life’s trajectory.

• Dog bites may lead to serious infections if not properly treated.

• Rehabilitation costs for reconstructive surgeries after severe dog attacks can be overwhelming.

• The psychological trauma suffered from a vicious attack cannot be underestimated.

• Loss of income due to hospital stays or recovery periods should be accounted for in any dispute.

Here at Carlson Bier, our deep understanding of Illinois laws regarding dog bites positions us accordingly not just to pursue compensation on your behalf but also enable effective navigation through this confusing post-injury landscape. This includes underscored irrefutable points within the law:

Under the 510 ILCS 5/16 Animal Control Act (Illinois), owners are held accountable “if a dog attacks without provocation” hence solidifying your right as a victim for pursuing compensation from the owner’s homeowners’ insurance policy. Furthermore, under this provision “leash law” areas become hot-spots for legally induced accountability where unleashed dogs bear formidable liabilities against their owners resulting in higher recoverability chances for victims who suffered unprovoked attack(s).

In articulating your claim with precision and persuasiveness backed by evidence like medical bills/reports, wage loss statements among others – we will strive to safeguard your legal rights and make sure your case receives the attention it deserves. We stand beside our clients every step of the way, making otherwise complex concepts easily understandable whilst ensuring you are kept abreast through a seamless, transparent process.

Dog bite cases hinge not only on substantive law but also significantly on procedural matters that demand mastery. Our extensive experience has underscored how rigorous investigations post-incident by collecting imperative evidence (including eye-witness statements), meticulous documentations for injuries sustained, coupled with strategic negotiations with insurance companies form cornerstones towards substantial claims’ recoverability.

At Carlson Bier, we operate primarily under contingency-based fees – meaning there is no attorney charge unless we win compensation for you; guaranteeing us at your side without putting further strain onto your already overwhelmed situation.

Remember: Time is of critical essence as Illinois sets a statute of limitations requiring personal injury lawsuits to be filed within two years from when the injury occurred. Therefore it is crucial not to delay seeking legal assistance in order start building a robust case immediately.

Navigating this distressful time after enduring a dog bite may seem challenging but remember, you do not have to face it alone. Carlson Bier offers more than just exceptional legal services; we provide steadfast support consistently guided by empathy and comprehension.

Curiosity about what your claim might be worth? Interested in understanding if pursuing litigation would yield feasible reparations? Empower yourself today by clicking the button below for a no-obligation assessment into your dog-bite incident’s potential value. At Carlson Bier – ‘Your Cause Is Our Concern’. We aim to transform these harrowing circumstances into catalysts for restoring safety, justice and peace back into your life where they belong.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Clinton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Clinton

Areas of Practice in Clinton

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying adept legal advice for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering specialist legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Fall Incidents

Specialist in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents get reasonable settlement for hurts and harm.

Bike Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Incident

Providing adept legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Building Site Crashes

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in extending dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to defending victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​