...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cobden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When grappling with dog bite injuries in Cobden, turn to Carlson Bier as your beacon of legal insight and unwavering representation. With a profound understanding of Illinois law surrounding such incidents, our proficient team prides itself on delivering swift, apt responses that uphold your rights. Fair compensation for medical expenses or lessees associated with these harrowing instances is what we steadfastly seek. For Carlson Bier, every case matters. We diligently gather the facts and minutiae granting you deserving justice against an irresponsible dog owner’s negligence or mismanagement, all held consistent under the stringent regulations established by Illinois law governing dog bites cases. With us at your helm navigating this tumultuous journey becomes less overwhelming; instead it begins to resemble a shared initiative committed to procuring enhanced outcomes aligned towards repairing disrupted lives caused by canines’ unpredictability. Entrust your predicament into our seasoned hands: Let Carlson Bier demonstrate why they are considered prime within their field when one contends with distressing Dog Bite Injury complications within Cobden’s jurisdiction boundaries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cobden Illinois

In the broad field of Illinois personal injury law, Carlson Bier holds a distinct specialization in representing victims of dog bite injuries. When man’s best friend turns dangerous and causes harm to humans, life-altering situations can occur. Our team at Carlson Bier understands the magnitude of these incidents and is dedicated to fighting for justice for those who have been affected by this type of trauma.

Dog bites may appear small but often hold significant physical and psychological consequences. Every year, numerous Illinois residents suffer from harmful dog bites that lead to issues ranging from minor wounds and bruises to severe tissue damage or infections. Worse still, some fall victim to tragic fatalities as a result of vicious canine attacks—an eventuality most never envisaged.

Important measures need to be taken post such an incident:

• Medical attention must be obtained immediately following a dog bite

• Information regarding the incident should be documented meticulously

• Contact details should be collected from witnesses, if any.

Moreover, consulting a professional personal injury lawyer becomes crucial in seeking fair compensation for your injuries and suffering.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier possess deep understanding about specific dog bite laws governing Illinois state which provides an advantage when building strong cases on behalf of our clients. Under The Illinois Animal Control Act – an individual bitten by a pet can file a claim against its owner or caretaker even if it was the animal’s first aggressive act making recovery for damages simple compared to other states where one has to prove ‘vicious propensities’.

Our specialized lawyers ensure all facets are considered while constructing your case—extent of physical damage caused due to the incident including scars or disfiguration; mental distress experienced post-incident; pertinent medical bills; lost wages during recuperation periods; future treatments required due persistent injuries—all these while standing firmly beside you throughout the legal proceedings advocating solely for your rights.

Aggressive representation combined with empathetic handling separates us at Carlson Bier from others ensuring unbeatable service right from the initial consultation stage until settlement, arbitration or trial bringing peace of mind for victims transitioning through this traumatic phase. Our expertise transcends beyond representing individual clients as we also offer guidance to medical professionals treating patients and assist local councils with forming consequence-driven laws concerning predator pets.

Moreover, Carlson Bier operates on contingency fee basis indicating that there are no upfront costs for our clients. We only collect a percentage after successful resolution of case ensuring you have nothing to lose by engaging us but everything to gain.

Carlson Bier has carved its niche in the domain of dog bite injuries becoming a trusted name across Illinois. While we fervently wish such incidents don’t occur at all, if unfortunately they do – it is critically important for victims to be aware of their rights and best course of action post an untoward incident. Remember, we exist so that you do not have to navigate these legal complexities alone.

One cautionary note for potential clients – please remember Carlson Bier attorneys practice law throughout Illinois though does not imply being stationed in locations like Cobden without having physical offices there; acknowledging the state law ban against such implications.

By now it is clear that any incident involving dog bite demands careful handling and meticulous construction of case before moving legally forward— Carlsson Bier houses experienced lawyers specializing in just that! So if you’ve been affected by such an injury and unsure about how much your case might be worth, don’t worry – help is here. Click on the button below which will guide you into running a quick evaluation providing potentially valuable insights uncovering true value behind your claim making informed decisions easy resulting into fair compensation sooner than expected.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cobden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cobden

Areas of Practice in Cobden

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering specialist legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Delivering professional legal advice for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, providing adept legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Stumble Mishaps

Expert in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for harms and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Collision

Ensuring adept legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​