FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Colchester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident in Colchester, the experienced counselors at Carlson Bier are committed to providing exceptional legal service. With vast experience litigating cases of personal injury, we excel in representing victims embroiled in complex affairs such as pedestrian accidents. Our seasoned team navigates the demanding process with meticulous governance and vehement determination to achieve favorable results for our clients. At Carlson Bier, we employ an earnest approach toward every single case, applying our comprehensive knowledge about Illinois’ strict regulations regarding pedestrian safety laws. As your legal advocates, it’s our primary objective to ensure you obtain rightful restitution for medical expenses caused by negligence or mistake on part of vehicle operators thus evening out this life-altering incident’s detrimental impact. Furthermore, we work closely with investigating law enforcement officials during evidence gathering and meticulously building robust statements grounding your claim’s validity beyond skepticism. When considering representation for a devastating event like a pedestrian accident occurring around suburban havens like Colchester—consider none other than Carlson Bier—the epitome of unwavering resilience amidst adversarial times; a pledge manifesting into resounding success stories one resilient plaintiff at a time!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Colchester Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated personal injury attorney group based in Illinois and specializing in the complex legal field of Pedestrian Accidents. Our team is staunchly committed to protecting your rights and ensuring victims receive fair compensation for their loss and suffering. Pedestrian accident cases often involve sensitive and multifaceted areas of law that need expert insight and unwavering dedication.

Firstly, let’s discuss the diverse range of pedestrian accidents that can result from negligence, reckless behaviors or inadequate infrastructure like:

• Traffic violations by motorists leading to pedestrian crosswalk accidents

• Absent or inadequately managed sidewalks, urging pedestrians onto unsafe roads

• Construction or maintenance work sites lacking proper safety measures

In such instances, holding the accountable party responsible requires not just identifying them accurately but also gathering comprehensive proof showcasing their neglect or mistake.

The second point requires understanding how liability works. Under Illinois state law, a pedestrian has protection under both civil laws and traffic regulations. It’s pivotal that you know local statutes assign shared responsibility to both drivers and pedestrians. Consequently, it becomes crucial to hire adept legal assistance to analyze case specifics effectively.

Thirdly – injuries sustained during these accidents frequently include broken bones fractures, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), internal bleeding or even fatalities exposing stark reminders about associated physical trauma as well as emotional distress that typically follow such incidents. Medical bills quickly escalate while wages are being missed; hence procuring rightful compensation becomes essential for walking along the path towards recovery.

Also worth noting is insurance companies’ role post-incident – their primary objective revolves around minimizing claim payouts which equates to quick settlements with lesser amounts than what victims rightfully deserve regarding their losses comprehensively covered – including tangible ones like medical expenses & lost wages along with emotional tolls like pain & suffering owed due this unfortunate incident affecting their life adversely.

Perhaps you’re wondering what steps should be taken immediately following an accident? It’s advisable first seeking immediate medical attention regardless of whether injuries are visible or not. Secondly, ensuring police reports get filed detailing incident circumstances closely followed by gathering evidence including photographs, names & contact details of witnesses present at the scene – these prove vital during future legal proceedings leading towards attaining suitable compensation.

Lastly, it’s crucial to resist accepting premature settlements from insurance companies without thorough examination from professional legal counsel. Carlson Bier utilizes a strategic approach that allows successful negotiations on behalf our clients against the adversarial insurance companies while shielding them from exploitative tactics primarily aimed reducing payouts unfairly.

Every pedestrian accident case stands unique with its set variables – proper identification of liable party(s), accurate understanding about potential damages owed combined alongside diligent presentation during court proceedings goes a long way making difference between substantial compensations vis-a-vis mere minimal settlements.

You can ensure this difference for your circumstance by utilizing expert services offered at Carlson Bier. We strive towards safeguarding rights belonging to every client we represent staunchly fighting for what they rightfully deserve in wake of tragically impactful pedestrian accidents.

Are you ready now for taking an important step towards reclaiming control over your life post such unfortunate incidents? It begins discovering how much your case could be worth potentially. Our team awaits eagerly assisting you along this journey while steadfastly aiming towards securing justice duly owed to you under Illinois law. Please click on the button below to unveil possibilities awaiting ahead in terms of just compensations due for hardships inflicted unjustly upon you amidst delicate times following traumatic pedestrian accidents.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Colchester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Colchester

Areas of Practice in Colchester

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Providing adept legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring experienced legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving defective products, providing adept legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to helping individuals of car accidents secure reasonable compensation for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Mishap

Extending specialist legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Building Incidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in extending dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Committed to representing clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​