Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Colfax

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the distressing reality of a spinal cord injury, finding a capable and reliable attorney becomes paramount. In these situations, Colfax individuals consistently turn to Carlson Bier – attorneys who prioritize your wellbeing and recovery above all else. Our legal team is diligent in their pursuit for justice, making certain that those responsible for your trauma are held accountable. With extensive experience handling spinal cord injury cases, we understand what these complex claims entail from medical considerations to potential insurance complications. Acclaimed as one of Illinois’s top personal injury law firms, we retain an exceptional record reflecting our commitment towards securing substantial compensation on behalf of our clients – advocating relentlessly so you can focus on healing and rehabilitation without financial stress weighing you down. Carlson Bier’s dedicated professional service extends far beyond traditional lawyer-client protocol; personalized attention reflects our core belief that at this challenging juncture in your life only victorious litigation married with empathetic counsel will suffice! Trust us because at Carlson Bier associates every client’s battle holds essence unique unto itself.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Colfax Illinois

As you navigate our website, the team at Carlson Bier aims to empower you in your understanding of personal injury law—particularly with regard to Spinal Cord Injuries. Based right here in Illinois, we are ardent advocates for those who have suffered due to another’s negligence or willful misconduct. While no two cases are identical, a thorough comprehension of spinal cord injuries can serve as an invaluable precursor before looking into legal routes.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) can dramatically alter people’s lives without warning, often resulting from accidents or malpractice which might entitle victims to compensation via personal injury claims. At their core, these damages constitute disruption to the spine that severely hampers motor functions and sensations—a condition gravely debilitating both physically and mentally.

There’re several types of SCIs such as Contusions (bruising of the spinal cord), Compression (caused by pressure on the spinal cord), and Lacerations (severing or tearing of nerve fibers). Additionally, Central Cord Syndrome could occur when damage is concentrated at centre nerves — leading to loss in fine motor skills or paralysis of limbs.

Proving liability necessitates discerning whether injuries were genuinely accidental or if they arose through actions violating a duty of care legally owed by the offender to the claimant. The gravity of an SCI means that settlements negotiated often accommodate substantial aid – given how easily an accident could instigate long-term disability and demand subsequent adjustments for daily life.

– Understand the impacts: Chronic pain, loss of sensation & limited motion capacity characterize SCIs.

– Ascertain cause: Is it road traffic accident? Medical malpractice? Workplace Accident?

– Dig Deep: gather all crucial facts about your case — medical records indicating severity/longevity, incident reports implicating responsible parties etc.

– Initiate Consultation: Reach out for expert advice regarding possible compensatory reimbursement.

Herein lies where Carlson Bier strides forward; our seasoned attorneys recognize the profound upheaval faced by SCI victims and shoulder these concerns with a staunch commitment to pursuing justice. Endorsing your rights, we provide indispensable counsel to negotiate optimal settlements for medical bills, lost wages, and compensation for pain and traumatic ordeal.

Drawing on seasoned experience of presiding over many injury cases in Illinois—Carlson Bier has curated an ingrained understanding of necessary legal manoeuvres. We work diligently — researching every facet of your case complemented by candid discussions elucidating various stages involved in achieving favorable outcomes. Personally tailored strategy marches alongside ardent dedication as we advocate for rightful restitution on your behalf.

With Carlson Bier fortifying your corner, you gain assurance that diligent researchers pore over every detail; tenacious negotiators unflinchingly face opposing teams; compassionate advocates empathize deeply with victims; upright professionals remain frank about possible repercussions affecting final settlement amounts. Essentially, we encapsulate balanced expertise needed while dealing with such life-altering injuries.

We passionately believe in empowering clients through knowledge delivery during this journey entailing physical recovery paralleled by pursuit of deserved compensation—a belief embodied throughout our website content. Therefore, irrespective whether currently contemplating litigation or simply seeking more awareness—we hope that this discussion revolving around SCIs fulfills that aim adequately.

Seeking compensation following a Spinal Cord Injury can indeed be a bewildering navigational course—this is where Carlson Bier steps in to clarify perplexities & fight tirelessly on your behalf! While we fervently wish none ever suffers from such afflictions, it remains crucial ensuring equal access to comprehensive legal advice when unfortunately required.

While you’ve armed yourself with valuable information here regarding SCIs—the monumental step remains translating said knowledge into tangible action benefitting YOU directly! To help gauge potential recourses available following personal injury related tremendously disruptive SCI—we cordially invite you towards clicking the button below: discover realistically what expectations should stay held regarding rightful compensation potentially won from your case. Grant yourself this well-deserved peace of mind, since at Carlson Bier, we staunchly champion your rights!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Colfax Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Colfax

Areas of Practice in Colfax

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending adept legal assistance for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Medical Malpractice

Offering specialist legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, offering expert legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing adept legal assistance for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Specializing in ensuring professional legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to representing persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer