...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Colona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced a slip and fall accident in Colona, Carlson Bier is an exceptional choice to consider as your legal representative. As skilled attorneys with an emphasis on personal injury law, our expertise is fortified by years of experience managing intricate cases, ensuring fair justice for those injured due to negligence of others. Why should you put your trust in us? At Carlson Bier, we excel at obtaining favorable results because we understand that each case holds unique complexities requiring personalized strategy planning – all designed primarily around winning rightful compensation for our clients’ hardships. Our commitment towards authenticity empowers us to handle every aspect of the litigation process efficiently and transparently. We deeply believe that time spent empowering clients about their legal standing would never be wasted, thereby nurturing a knowledge-based relationship where clients can make informed decisions throughout the journey together with us at Carlson Bier – a true reassurance during tough times after slip and falls accidents felt by anyone.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Colona Illinois

Carlson Bier’s team of seasoned personal injury attorneys is proud to serve residents throughout the great state of Illinois, offering them unparalleled expertise and personalized legal counsel. Our practice focuses on diverse areas of personal injury, including Slip and Fall Accidents – one of the most commonly occurring incidents with substantial impact on quality of life.

Understanding a slip and fall accident begins by knowing its definition: it refers to situations where an individual slips, trips or falls as a result of a hazardous condition in someone else’s property. This could entail various risky circumstances ranging from wet floors, poor lighting, uneven surfaces to unexpected changes in flooring materials.

Here are some insightful facts about such accidents:

• Slip and fall accidents rank among the leading causes for serious injuries.

• They can occur anytime anywhere regardless of age; however, seniors above 65 years experience the highest risk at large.

• Unseen slippery elements like water spillages often lead to these perilous mishaps causing undue harm that could otherwise be avoided had appropriate safety measures been implemented sooner.

The Carlson Bier team underscores educating clients about their rights following slip and fall accidents. For instance, under Illinois premises liability law, property owners have a responsibility towards ensuring safety standards are not compromised in any way within their property limits. When this fails to happen ensuing in damage or disruptive consequences for others inflicting pain or suffering, then our committed attorney group does what it does best – fighting tirelessly till justice prevails.

Navigating laws pertaining to slip and fall accidents requires experienced hands on deck due to complexities that typically emerge when proving negligence on behalf of property owners or managers involved. Carlson Bier is well-versed with these challenges since we’re specialists who’ve been triumphantly handling hundreds of such cases with proven track records denoting our impressive success rates over time.

Moreover, every case bears unique hallmarks demanding custom-tailored approach strategies:

• Determining full scope damages incurred during accident aftermath

• Authenticating fault basis by illustrating how the negligent party could have prevented the accident but didn’t

• Underlining extent of injuries sustained, whether physical or emotional distress

• Comprehensively demonstrating how these injuries have destabilized your life

Remember, Carlson Bier is ever ready to partner with you in questing for rightful compensation owed due to another individual’s negligence. We value being there when it matters most, shedding light on complicated legal procedures while making certain that each step taken aligns perfectly with paving way towards positive final verdict outcomes.

This accomplished personal injury attorney group prides themselves on transparent communication and candidness – always directing clients into well-informed decisions contributing to their long-term welfare. Importantly, we operate on a contingency fee basis; this means if we don’t win, you don’t pay a cent – our top priority lies in helping victims rebuild their lives rather than depleting them further financially through unfair stacks of remunerations required upfront.

Reliability and authenticity form core constituents that define who we are at Carlson Bier. Although some law firms may claim to be present everywhere when they aren’t physically stationed in particular locations – which contravenes Illinois state laws -, rest assured that our professional legal handling doesn’t resort to such unsavory tactics compromising integrity levels maintained.

Our devotion remains unscathed: relentlessly championing your rights ensuring you obtain best possible financial recovery amounts post-slip and fall accidents encountered as quickly and efficiently as possible. Hence, why wait? Click below right away to find out potential worthiness attached with your case courtesy of an immediate free consultation offer provided by none other than Carlson Bier’s exceptional personal injury lawyers reigning supreme within the heartland of Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Colona Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Colona

Areas of Practice in Colona

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying skilled legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing experienced legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying skilled legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents receive equitable remuneration for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Semi Collision

Extending experienced legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Expert in delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Expertise in handling cases for people who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and expert legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Committed to defending victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​