...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Como

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be distressing and complicated, making it paramount to have reliable legal representation. Look no further than Carlson Bier, known for advocating passionately on behalf of their Dog Bite Injuries clients in Illinois. Our expert attorneys are proficient in handling these cases with the utmost care, ensuring that your rights are protected at all times. We pride ourselves on our eagerness to fight for justice versus insurance companies who may not want to pay maximum compensation deserved by victims. Working with us implies receiving unrivaled expertise east of Mississippi; we meticulously scrutinize every detail of each case based on Illinois’s stringent regulations. When you engage Carlson Bier attorney group’s services for dog bite injuries matter, rest assured; it is the dedication coupled with diligence from years spent championing similar causes that will represent you aggressively if necessary while handling your situation empathetically because we understand how traumatic such incidents can be. Trust us because ultimately Carlson Bier stands synonymous with highest quality service delivery when faced with a damaging canine-related mishap!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Como Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical trauma that can stem from dog bite injuries. As personal injury attorneys, our primary goal is to provide support, guidance and legal expertise in Illinois for those who have been unfortunate victims of such incidents. Dog bites can result in severe injuries — some leading to long-term disability, surgery or even death, depending on the degree of attack. It is important that individuals are empowered with knowledge about their rights and legal avenues for restitution following a devastating event like a dog bite.

One needs to be informed first and foremost about potential scenarios that may follow a dog bite incident. Not all resolutions are created equal and the extent of compensation can vary greatly based on specific factors surrounding your case:

– The severity of your sustained injury.

– Any prolonged medical treatment required post-incident.

– Psychological impact caused by the traumatic event.

– Undue losses (like income loss) due to hospital visits or recovery periods.

These aspects serve as focal points when claiming compensation for incurred damages.

Moreover, understanding this state’s strict liability law pertaining to dog bites is crucially advantageous for you. This law holds owners absolutely responsible if they fail remarkably in preventing their dogs from causing harm – regardless of whether the owner knew previously that his/her pet had violent tendencies.

Turning towards Illinois law specifically, it affords victims some advantages over other states’ laws due to its fairness and firm stand against inadequately controlled dogs roaming free. It’s critical you grasp what differentiates Illinois from others:

– A single-bite rule doesn’t apply meaning irrespective of how many times an animal has bitten before; each occurring incident matters independently.

– Dangerous breed discrimination doesn’t exist here; any breed possesses capacity for harmful aggression making no hierarchy among them regarding potential threat level.

Understanding these facts makes clear that statutory guidelines concerning dog bite cases are vigilant within this jurisdiction ensuring justified outcomes most preferably. With Carlson Bier on your side, our cumulative legal comprehension and years of experience have demonstrated the acuity to fetch fair settlements even in complex dog bite cases.

It also bodes well for those affected that no upfront fees are demanded from them till their case has been resolved favorably. Such financial reassurances serve to alleviate some stress during already trying circumstances. Of course, tangible benefits aside, paramount to our company ethos is ensuring clients feel fully supported and understood throughout their entire legal journey.

So now after being briefed about compelling facts surrounding dog bites injuries along with related systems in place within Illinois state law designed for rightful compensation; let’s cast light on how Carlson Bier can make difference here.

We fully appreciate how devastating experiencing a traumatic incident like a dog bite can be. Dealing with physical injury, emotional imbalance and then confronting unfamiliar legal proceedings – it can seem daunting initially. But you don’t need to face these challenges alone. Collaborating with us means full access to law experts who compassionately take on worry from your shoulders enabling focus primarily upon healing not paperwork.

All said, obtaining any form of restitution canot undo past adversities but it aids considerably towards alleviating consequences balancing towards else better ahead. If you’ve suffered as result of dog bite reach out — consider advantageously using array provided expertise here at Carlson Bier group.

Find out why numerous clients have entrusted their personal injury compensations claims to us – navigating through phases necessary towards proficient resolution awaits conveniently by clicking below button determining what your particular case could essentially be worth…Regain control over trajectory approaching future holds: Trust us today yet benefit tomorrow!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Como Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Como

Areas of Practice in Como

Bicycle Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending expert legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering experienced legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents obtain fair recompense for harms and losses.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Crash

Ensuring expert legal support for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Building Collisions

Concentrated on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer