Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Como

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or a loved one, have been the victim of a pedestrian accident in Como, Illinois; choosing Carlson Bier as your legal representative demonstrates an unwavering commitment towards pursuing justice. Our law firm’s reputation for excellence in personal injury cases is founded on our meticulous attention to detail and adept understanding of governing laws related to such accidents. Focusing particularly on pedestrian-related incidents at Carlson Bier places us at the forefront of these complex cases where compassion fused with aggressive advocacy can make a discernable difference. We pride ourselves not just on winning claims but also securing maximum compensation based upon individual circumstances. With unwavering dedication and extensive experience in negotiation – against even major insurance companies – we fight relentlessly for your rights by offering valuable guidance throughout every stage of proceedings and handling intricate litigation procedures efficiently when required. A serious incident does not have to mean severe financial distress too; let Carlson Bier expertly steer through this challenging phase with your best interest being our top priority.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Como Illinois

As the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, specializing in personal injury representation based in Illinois, we pride ourselves on lending our expertise and support to those deeply affected by pedestrian accidents. These often sudden occurrences tend to have profound implications both physically and mentally for their victims. It’s crucial that anyone involved or impacted by such circumstances understands their rights and the potential proceedings they might be facing.

Pedestrian accidents are incidents where a person walking is struck by a vehicle or cyclist — situations unfortunately too frequent on today’s busy roadways. The aftermath can consequently trigger severe injuries such as brain trauma, spinal cord damage, broken bones and occasionally tragically lead to fatalities. Furthermore, emotional turmoil can ensue due to these life-altering events which also require significant consideration.

At Carlson Bier, we offer comprehensive services when it comes to addressing pedestrian accidents including:

• Assisting with insurance claims: We understand that dealing with insurance companies can be overwhelming in such times of stress and difficulty. Our proficient attorneys navigate through all procedures seamlessly ensuring you receive what you’re entitled to.

• Legal advice: We provide expert consultation detailing all your possible options after an accident has occurred. This enables the victim and their family members to make informed decisions about how best to proceed.

• Litigation: In instances where filing a lawsuit becomes necessary against negligent parties responsible for the accident, Carlson Bier stands prepared for litigation— passionately advocating justice for the injured party.

Understanding your rights is paramount post pedestrian-accident incidence. All pedestrians have specific rights under Illinois law aimed at safeguarding individuals from unjust treatment following any unfortunate encounters with vehicles or cyclists. Interestingly enough, even if the pedestrian may seem partially at fault – there may still be considerable room for compensation given comparative negligence factors set forth within Illinois statutes.

Next up is understanding some key responsibilities of drivers towards pedestrians like respecting crosswalks—not rushing pedestrians crossing; not overtaking stopped cars which might shield crossing pedestrians; yielding right of way to the pedestrian on uncontrolled roadways or intersections; to name a few. Any breach in these responsibilities may attribute liability to drivers.

Also, worth noting is that time is of the essence following such occurrences as Illinois has a statute of limitations constraining the timeframe within which one can pursue legal action post-accident. This makes it all-important not to delay pursuing your rights after an unfortunate incident occurs.

Finally, while it’s important that you seek immediate medical assistance post incidents regardless of seeming injury severity — it’s also highly recommended to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney even if you might initially feel overwhelmed by your predicament. Irrespective of how complex or straightforward your situation seems, at Carlson Bier we offer tailor-made services ensured to protect and uphold your rights during times when you need this support most.

The question therefore isn’t whether you should contact us today – rather when? Because every moment matters towards bolstering your claim for fair compensation within critical time-bound parameters dictated by law.

Why wait longer than necessary (or why shoulder more liability) carrying hefty healthcare costs or unnecessary guilt while coping with potential life-altering consequences?

Extend your trust towards our capable team here at Carlson Bier and receive the compensation that rightfully belongs to you whilst ensuring justice truly prevails on behalf of those unfairly affected by pedestrian accidents.

Are you considering learning about the possibilities open to you given recent developments around pedestrian accident involvement? Why not take advantage now by clicking below and discovering what value lies in store through a free case evaluation? Let our experts guide you towards unlocking just what exactly your unique circumstances could be worth within this context— click below without further ado!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Como Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Como

Areas of Practice in Como

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Supplying professional legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing experienced legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Fall Mishaps

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain just payout for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Incident

Delivering specialist legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in delivering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Injury

Expert in supporting persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer