...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cornell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the repercussions of painful dog bite injuries in Cornell, the reputable law firm Carlson Bier is your optimal choice for legal support. Our team specializes in dog bite injury cases and understands exactly how to navigate this intricate area of personal injury law, building powerful cases that advocate for victims’ rights and fair compensation. We understand that these incidents can result in severe physical harm, emotional distress, extensive medical expenses amongst other damning consequences. Thus we tenaciously fight for each case aiming at full recovery or maximum advantage possible by Illinois laws on financial damages encompassed within these cases. We pride ourselves with profound familiarity with local regulations and sensitivity towards our clients’ unique circumstances – aiming always to achieve optimum results through skilled negotiation or litigation when necessary. At Carlson Bier, we aren’t just professional attorneys; we’re compassionate advisors standing beside you during exhausting times – ensuring justice is served in every dog bite incidence faced by residents across Cornell’s community.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cornell Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we emphasize on empowering our clients and readers with critical knowledge about personal injury law. A noteworthy section of that is understanding the nuances of dog bite injuries – a lesser-known but significant area of concern within this jurisdiction. Illinois state experiences many such cases annually, making it crucial for its residents to be well-acquainted with their legal rights and the obligations of pet owners.

Dog bites can cause substantial physical harm and psychological trauma. It’s not just about wounds or fractures; sometimes victims also face post-traumatic stress disorders following such incidents. Even seemingly benign scratches could result in grave infections if not treated promptly or properly. On top of these are the economically straining medical expenditures which, unfortunately, most victims are unprepared for.

There’s good news though! Under Illinois law, animal owners are held responsible for damages caused by their pets under any circumstances except when the victim was trespassing or provoking the dog. This is known as strict liability rule where showing negligence on part of owner is unnecessary; proof that his/her pet caused injury is enough to claim compensation.

This brings us to some key points you must remember:

• Dog owner’s responsibility: The severity of your injuries doesn’t lighten the pet owner’s obligations towards compensating you.

• Time limits: In Illinois you have two years from date of accident to file a claim (known as statute limitation).

• Multiple parties: Sometimes landlords or property managers can also be held accountable along with pet owners for dog bite injuries sustained on their premises.

Navigating through these complexities indeed requires specialist expertise- which is where Carlson Bier steps in!

We house an experienced team of personal injury attorneys who diligently work towards securing maximum possible compensation for dog bite victims across the state. Education remains at forefront here; ensuring clients understand every step being taken and why it matters at all – whether it’s gathering evidence, dealing with insurance companies or even pushing forward into courtroom if necessary!

Our track record in securing substantial settlements reflects our commitment to victims of dog bites. We gather meticulous evidence about the accident scene, injury and its impact on your life – right down to minute details often overlooked like psychological trauma or impact on earning capacity. At Carlson Bier, we combat any arguments insurance companies might present to minimise your claim; serving them with compelling counter-evidence and legal principles.

The trick is in understanding how law works and turning that knowledge into leverage while negotiating for rightful compensation; something only seasoned attorneys with extensive experience could achieve! And it’s these very experiences that make us an impeccable choice when seeking assistance for dog bite injuries.

Given the intricacies involved, acting timely becomes paramount so as not to allow crucial evidence diminishing due to passing time. Every second counts here! Whether you’re unsure about validity of your claim or completely bewildered where to even begin, at Carlson Bier we welcome all queries-big or small!

So why wait? Allow us help you understand if and what you’re entitled for in a potential dog bite incident. Click on button below- let’s take this vital step together towards upholding your rights under Illinois law and assess the true worth of your case, simply because at Carlson Bier every case matters equally-as does each client!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cornell Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cornell

Areas of Practice in Cornell

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving specialist legal services for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal support to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Trip Occurrences

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents get appropriate settlement for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Accident

Ensuring specialist legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Building Collisions

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Focused on offering expert legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Damage

Specializing in defending clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​