Medical Malpractice Attorney in Countryside

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with medical malpractice issues, time-tested experience counts. Carlson Bier champions the rights of malpractice victims in Countryside, offering a level of dedication and expertise that is second to none. Our meticulous attention to detail combined with our tenacious approach sets us apart as we tirelessly work towards seeking justice for those harmed due to clinical negligence. We pride ourselves on delivering personalized services, understanding each case’s unique aspects while striving relentlessly for maximum compensation for your losses. Medical errors can have devastating consequences; at Carlson Bier, we appreciate this truth and treat every case with utmost compassion and seriousness it deserves. With proven litigation skills honed over years of practice in Illinois’ legal landscape, be assured you’re backed by the best representation possible when you choose Carlson Bier – where unmatched proficiency meets unwavering commitment in seeking justice for medical malpractice cases across Countryside.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Countryside Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our dedicated personal injury attorneys understand the devastating impact that medical malpractice can have on a person’s life. As compassionate legal professionals based in Illinois, we aim to provide valuable insight into this complex area of law and offer skillful representation to victims seeking justice and compensation.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional negligently causes harm or injury to a patient by deviating from accepted standards of practice within the field. This neglect may take various forms including incorrect diagnosis or treatment, surgical errors, medication mistakes, lax monitoring of a patient’s condition, inadequacy regarding safety protocols or failure to obtain informed consent about risks associated with particular procedures.

• A focused understanding of the ‘Standard of Care’ is crucial as it forms the primary benchmark used in evaluating negligence in medical services. Essentially, this standard demands that healthcare practitioners must show a level of skill and attention commensurate with other competent professionals performing comparable operations under similar conditions.

• Determining fault in these cases requires establishing four key elements: duty (the doctor-patient relationship), breach (deviation from accepted standards), causation (this deviation caused your injuries), and damages (proof that you suffered physical or emotional harm).

One important aspect often overlooked by individuals is the statute of limitations for filing such lawsuits. In Illinois, a victim generally has two years from discovering their injury (or reasonably should have discovered) but not more than four years from the date the act occurred to initiate legal proceedings for adult patients.

Our skilled attorney team at Carlson Bier works tirelessly analyzing every detail pertaining to your case – consulting multiple experts where necessary- to build robust evidence capable of proving negligence beyond reasonable doubt so as to secure deserved compensation for all our clients.

Even though monetary recovery cannot fully compensate for long-term mental anguish or physical trauma experienced through schedules disruptions due to treatment routines which sometimes lead rests at various health institutions causing unanticipated financial burdens – nonetheless they do provide some modicum of respite and much-needed financial relief.

Examples of damages recoverable include medical expenses (both past and future predicted ones), loss of income, decreased earning capacity, pain and suffering, permanent disability or disfigurement, mental distress and costs associated with changed lifestyle necessities such as home modifications.

We also recognize the pivotal role that support systems can play in recovery; it is crucial to note that family members may be eligible for compensation due to loss of consortium if your life-altering injury has significantly impaired your relationships.

At Carlson Bier, we are tenacious advocates in pursuing justice for victims of medical malpractice. With our dedicated team leading the charge on your behalf, you won’t have to navigate through this legal maze alone – you will always have a powerful ally by your side.

If you or a loved one believe you’ve been subjected to harm as a result from substandard health care provision; understanding rights regarding possible retributions could meaningfully aid towards mitigating long term negative impacts. Though we cannot change devastating effects due to professional negligence what we can offer you is unwavered support every step along the way- ensuring the responsible parties are held accountable thereby assisting impacted individuals regain some control over their lives going forward

To clarify further how much your case might be worth under Illinois Law’s specificities — please select ‘Find Out Now’ button provided below – Your potential claim value might surprise you!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Countryside Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Countryside

Areas of Practice in Countryside

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Providing professional legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing professional legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Stumble Injuries

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents secure fair remuneration for harms and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Accident

Ensuring professional legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Committed to delivering expert legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Committed to representing victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer