FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Crest Hill

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Staying safe from harm is our innate desire but often, unpredictable dog bite injuries become unfortunate realities. If you or your loved ones confront this misfortunate incident in Crest Hill, the services of Carlson Bier should be your first consideration. Our dedicated attorneys excel in personal injury cases with a specialization in dog bite incidents. Through years of experience and honed expertise, clients receive effective representation ensuring their lawful rights are upheld and justly compensated for losses suffered due to these traumatic events. As per Illinois law, it’s crucial that when faced with such distressing situations where medical bills mount up alongside emotional anguish recovery becomes challenging without proper legal assistance on time; consider reaching out to Carlson Bier for assistance especially if confronted within Crest Hill vicinity- we at Carlson Bier strongly emphasize client satisfaction through meticulous handling of each case conducted by empowered knowledgeable professionals providing unmatched aid during trying times revolving around Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Crest Hill Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that dog bite injuries can be particularly traumatic experiences. As a dedicated personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, our primary aim is to help victims of dog bite injuries navigate the complex litigation process and secure the compensation they deserve.

Dog bite injuries can range from minor lacerations to severe damage requiring surgery or even life-changing consequences like permanent disfigurement. These incidents often cause acute psychological trauma as well, leaving victims with persistent anxiety or fear around animals. Unfortunately, many are not aware of their legal rights when such accidents occur. Our team at Carlson Bier is committed to addressing this knowledge gap and assisting those injured through no fault of their own.

One critical aspect all should comprehend after suffering from a dog bite is the statute of limitations in Illinois for filing a lawsuit against the liable party. In Illinois, victims have two years from the incident’s date – but acting sooner rather than later maximizes your chances for justice and proper reparation. Immediate medical attention following any dog-related injury is also paramount – not only for your health but also because medical records serve as crucial evidence in these cases

Understanding liability issues surrounding dog bites forms another key area where we offer highlighted guidance:

• First-time bites: The una wareness that their canine can act violently does not protect owners under Illinois law – it holds them responsible for any harm caused by their pet regardless.

• Leashing laws: If an unleashed dog attacks someone outside its property, the owner could bear more significant liability.

• Provocation: If victims were provoking or tormenting the animal before being bitten, it might affect how damages are assessed in a claim.

Such complexities underscore how vital expert legal assistance becomes during these challenging times – assistance which Carlson Bier specializes in providing so you are never alone throughout this ordeal.

Beyond physical pain and psychological distress which follow an unfortunate incident like this, financial troubles can weigh heavy on one’s shoulders too – the cost of treatment, possible loss of work, and potential long-term rehabilitation can mount. Our personal injury expertise comes into play here again, offering comprehensive support aiming to get you a fair settlement that covers all these injuries and inconveniences.

Victims often have reservations about filing lawsuits against dog owners – especially when they happen to be friends or family members. However, it’s essential to remember that compensation usually comes from their homeowner or renter’s insurance policy, not out of pocket – another aspect where our professional guidance can ease your way.

Bringing an empathetic approach combined with litigation prowess honed through years of experience allows us at Carlson Bier to secure favorable outcomes for our clients consistently. We bleed for your bleeding and persist until we’ve left no stone unturned in the fight for your rights.

Each dog bite case carries its own unique set of circumstances – but whatever yours may involve, we offer legal solutions tailored specifically to meet them head-on. Use the button below now to find out what your case might be worth – our seasoned attorney team is ready and eager to help you navigate this earthly ordeal towards a brighter horizon forward.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crest Hill Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Crest Hill

Areas of Practice in Crest Hill

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Supplying specialist legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering expert legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Stumble Incidents

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Wounds

Providing legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents receive fair recompense for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Accident

Delivering specialist legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for injuries.

Construction Crashes

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Damages

Dedicated to ensuring professional legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440