FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Creston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Defending victims of dog bite injuries in Creston, Carlson Bier is a recognized authority that consistently offers an exemplary service. Highly skilled at navigating the intricacies of personal injury law, this team rigorously champions for just compensation owing to these distressing incidents. You need tenacious advocates who understand your plight – Carlson Bier’s highly-skilled attorneys do exactly that. Personalized attention to each case enables our legal team to comprehensively considering all factors – strengthening your claim and optimising potential compensations. The firm’s sterling reputation in achieving fair settlements testifies to their proven track record on behalf of countless dog bite clients. Given their expertise in strategizing robust litigation against culpable parties, they always ensure you’re neither overwhelmed nor shortchanged during this arduous process; providing assurance during uncertain times as only true professionals can do so well.

Leverage the experience and dedication provided by Carlson Bier for handling any Dog Bite Injury-related cases within the Creston jurisdiction with diligence and conscientiousness unmatched elsewhere.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Creston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the distressing aftermath of a dog bite injury. As a distinguished Personal Injury Attorney Group based in Illinois, our primary commitment is to provide keen legal representation when you need it most. Dog bites range from minor wounds to serious injuries with lifelong complications – they not only cause physical damage but often leave emotional scars behind. It’s important that victims know their rights and have access to quality legal recourse.

Dog-related injuries are more common than one might think. Nearly 4.7 million dog bites occur each year in America alone, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We firmly believe that knowledge can be empowering during tough times – hence educating about such prominent incidents is equally vital as offer expertly representing in courtrooms.

We’ve detailed key points concerning the same:

• Dog owners have a responsibility: Dog owners must ensure their pet does not harm others. If someone gets injured due to their negligent behavior or failure to control their pet, then there are grounds for pressing charges against them under the right circumstances.

• Understand your rights: Victims should never feel helpless after these tragic accidents – the law has intricate provisions safeguarding their interests and thus empower them navigate through this turmoil efficiently.

• Compensation entitlement: In terms of damages, medical expenses aren’t your only concern.You’re also entitled to pain and suffering compensation including lost wages if you’ve missed work subsequent to attack related disabilities.

An accomplished attorney proficient in personal injury law will guide you better while addressing pivotal factors affecting your claim like aggravation of pre-existing conditions or foreseeability of an accident

Carlson Bier team members appreciate how traumatic it can be facing a dog bite incident. Our desire is for clients identify us as allies who stand by them throughout every step of resolution journey, always pursuing maximum recovery on their behalf.

Now comes an important question – How much could my case be worth? Answering this depends upon many criteria like severity of your injuries, emotional distress faced, loss of earnings etc. It’s paramount for us that you make an informed decision hence we encourage developing a better understanding about these aspects before moving forward with your case.

The best route to clarify all those inhibitions and uncertainties is through a thorough discussion with our legal experts. That’s why at the bottom of this page, you’ll find an option to click on “Find out how much my case could be worth”. We invite you to take advantage of it.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t promise miracles or give unjustified guarantees – instead, any statements made by us are based purely on dedication towards our clients’ well-being coupled with robust legal expertise. We relentlessly strive to uphold professional integrity in every interaction – not because laws dictate us, but because our moral commitment inspires doing so.

Being a part of Illinois community instills us unwavering commitment towards upholding its regulations ardently ,thus assuring potential clients about legitimacy maintained while operating within geographical constraints set forth .Our objective is clear : want victims successfully emerge from their trauma backed by rightful compensation entitled to them.

In keeping with Illinois law respecting business locations,this way doesn’t imply physical presence in Creston or serves as representation from there but concentrates endorsing trustworthiness reflecting in dealings.

Feel stronger knowing educated choice made when choosing representation.It’s time reclaim life beyond injury.

Carlson Bier- Offering lawful support individuals during their toughest times…Click below now,to start journey towards deserved relief.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Creston Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Creston

Areas of Practice in Creston

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing specialist legal advice for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents secure fair remuneration for harms and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Big Rig Accident

Extending experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Building Incidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on ensuring professional legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440