...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Crestwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Dog Bite Injuries in Crestwood, choosing the right attorney is crucial. Carlson Bier is a reputable name that excels within this niche of personal injury law across Illinois. Their adept understanding of legal complexities makes them optimally suited for handling these sensitive cases, prioritizing client well-being and justice above all else. The highly specialized team at Carlson Bier offers personalized attention to each case, thoroughly scrutinizing all aspects for maximum compensation. They are seasoned in navigating intricate laws relating to dog bite incidents and hold an impressive track record for securing favorable verdicts enabling recovery from physical, emotional, and financial hardships caused by such traumatic events. As recognized leaders in their field, they demonstrate a staunch commitment to protecting your rights as victims while seeking fair resolution under Illinois law governing Dog’s Bite injuries scenarios.

In Crestwood or elsewhere statewide; if you’ve suffered from a distressing dog bite incident – trust none other than Carlson Bier to turn your crisis into assurance legally . Trust the firm that treats clients with compassion , diligence and utmost professionalism : choose Carlson Bier .

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Crestwood Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be daunting and frustrating. At Carlson Bier, we understand both the urgency and complexity of your situation; with decades of experience in handling personal injury cases throughout Illinois, our team is primed to help you find justice. Dog bites can inflict serious harm – physical, emotional as well as financial. As an innocent victim, you’re not just contending with wounds that may require stitches or surgery but also subjected to a trauma that might cause severe psychological distress.

In an era where more families own dogs than ever before, these incidents occur all too frequently. The repercussions extend from immediate medical costs to lost wages due to absence from work and long-term therapy necessary for complete recovery which easily adds up to substantial monetary impact.

Here are some key points about dog bite injuries that you should know:

– Under Illinois law (510 ILCS 5/16), dog owners can be held strictly liable for any injuries their pets cause if they attacked without provocation while the victim was legally allowed on the premises where the incident occurred.

– In certain circumstances, landlords and property management companies may share liability especially if they were aware of the presence and dangerous tendencies of a resident’s dog yet failed to take reasonable measures.

– Brave victims who seek legal recourse often manage to secure considerable compensation after enlisting experienced attorneys like those at Carlson Bier.

We walk hand in hand with each client through this ordeal assessing damages inclusive but not limited to past, ongoing and future medical expenses; income loss due to resultant inability working full capacity; pain/suffering inflicted by attack; any permanent scarring or disfigurement suffered. For children particularly, whose malleable psyche are notably vulnerable following traumatic events such as this – counseling fees will also factor into amount claimed during negotiation or trial proceedings.

As experts at reading between lines in insurance policies our lawyers ensure smooth procedure while dealing leverage against insurers notorious for minimal payouts. It’s crucial to act promptly after an injury, so pictures of injuries and the scene, medical records, witness testimonies and any interaction with animal control or the police can collect before important evidence vanishes. Rest assured that Carlson Bier will leave no stone unturned in that aspect.

Navigating these legal waters on your own is a task riddled with peril; understanding legalese found in Illinois statutes pertaining dog bites is often complex, time-consuming, free from mistakes prone amongst layman attempting to decipher it. Added pressure piled already burdened shoulders if insurance companies become involved necessitate entrusting such concerns professional adept dealing industry tactics means helping victims regain lives they enjoyed prior unfortunate incident.

Although not based in Crestwood, our firm remains reachable across entire state providing guidance advice during these difficult times answering burning questions regarding complicated laws ensure victims fully understand rights how property exercise them. Both inside out courtroom relentless pursuit justice carried banner Carlson Bier identifies us standout choice personal injury claims.

No one should have to experience uncertainty anxiety surrounding legal process alone – deserves well-informed representation exhibits compassion dedication client’s cause through every stage journey battle fair favorable outcome. Benefit from extensive experience knowledge expert team strategizes viable pathway victory while you focus entirely healing putting life back on track.

Remember this: You are more than just another case file at Carlson Bier – you matter immensely to us; hence we invest wholeheartedly into pursuing optimal compensation deserving your ordeal. Let’s unravel intricacies enclosed within rights entitled under law work diligently towards securing justified recompense.

It’s time for action now. Scroll below and click on the button for immediate assessment of your entitlements – get truthful upfront evaluation revealing worth of case bearing no strings attached whatsoever. Time wait matters neither law favour delay lets start fightback without further ado!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crestwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Crestwood

Areas of Practice in Crestwood

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Providing professional legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Offering specialist legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents get fair compensation for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Committed to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Mishap

Delivering experienced legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in offering dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer