...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Creve Coeur

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to personal injury representation, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our skilled team has set a gold standard in delivering exceptional legal services across Illinois and we remain unparalleled in our commitment to securing tailored outcomes for our clients. We understand the profound impact that an accident can have on your life, health, and finances. That is why at Carlson Bier, we go above and beyond to ensure you secure fair compensation while maintaining your dignity and peace of mind during this strenuous process. Leveraging decades of combined experience handling complex cases like auto accidents or dangerous product claims unique to Creve Coeur residents’ experiences, trust us when we say your case is safe with us book-ended by seasoned expertise coupled with personalized attention putting client’s needs first always – because you deserve nothing less! Explore better options Don’t settle be served by best Personal Injury Attorney group; choose Carlson Bier today for a boundless pursuit of justice tailored uniquely around you!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Creve Coeur Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier – Illinois’ renowned law firm that specializes in providing top-tier legal services in the area of personal injury. Here at Carlson Bier, we understand how overwhelming and chaotic life can become after witnessing a personal injury incident. Our team of dedicated attorneys is committed to guiding you through this difficult time with resilience and empathy, ensuring your rights are vigorously protected while striving for justified compensation.

Personal Injury Law navigates the legal remedies and defenses involved in civil lawsuits brought forth as a result of wrongful conduct. In essence, it’s the law that arises when one person suffers harm from an accident or an injury caused by another individual who could or should have prevented the circumstances leading up to such incidents. At Carlson Bier, our lawyers employ robust strategies tailored specifically to shield you during these trying circumstances. We meticulously analyze each case’s unique dynamics so that we can provide proficient counsel resulting in the best possible outcome for our clients.

In line with offering effective counsel, it’s incumbent upon us at Carlson Bier to disseminate some salient aspects about Personal Injury:

•The onus lies heavily on negligence: To claim damages, prove that someone else was negligent or reckless.

•Statute Limitations: In Illnois, the statute of limitations provides two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit.

•Comparative Fault Rules: Even if you were partly responsible for an accident, you still could receive some level of compensation.

•No Automatic Entitlement: Winning a personal injury litigation requires proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Each client’s situation is unique; thus our approach is far from cookie-cutter solutions. Understanding your distinctive needs allows us to tailor appropriate legal measures towards achieving justice.

Our lawyers endeavor not only to gain fair compensation but also ensure healing processes aren’t hampered by financial burdening bills like medical expenditure and loss of wages due to incapacitation. By understanding Illinois’ intricate legal corridors associated with Personal Injury Law, we unearth loopholes and craft formidable defenses that not only bring justice to our clients but also deter future wrongdoers.

Carlson Bier’s attorneys come armed with expertise that routinely outmaneuvers insurance companies aiming to minimize payouts. We tirelessly work towards achieving an equitable balance where your legal rights intersect with maximum compensation. Our drive for outstanding client service coupled with a focused approach in advocating for personal injury victims sets us apart from other law firms.

Trust is the cornerstone of any attorney-client relationship. At Carlson Bier, you are more than just another case file; you are part of our extended family where securing your peace-of-mind through competent representation remains paramount. An experience and certified team of attorneys will handle your proceedings while keeping you abreast each step of the way—ensuring transparency throughout the process.

Wherever personal injuries occur within Illinois, we pledge ourselves to uphold the highest legal standards while staying true cascading enough hands-on knowledge enabling readers soundly tread this Law’s path. Here at Carlson Bier, our steadfast commitment isn’t limited to achieving favorable judgments today; it extends far beyond courtroom walls into setting profound precedents impacting personal injury law realms tomorrow.

Now that you’ve gained some understanding about Personal Injury Law and how Carlson Bier operates on such matters remember – Time is key! Expediency goes a long way when handling these cases as statutes around their litigation always have time restrictions. By uniting your cause with relentless advocacy offered by esteemed lawyers at Carlson Bier, receive personalized legal counsel fortified by compelling litigation strategies driving results.

Understanding and fighting for your rights doesn’t need to be stressful ordeal filled with jargon-intense consultations evoking further anxiety—a great solution awaits beneath this text! Take bold strides deciphering complexities lacing Personal Injury Law by reaching out to Carlson Bier—an exceptional law firm deeply vested in resolving this issue confidently navigate unsettling terrains through knowledgeable guidance perfect blend resoluteness and empathy. Go ahead, click the button below to begin exploring potential worth of your case; because at Carlson Bier, we fervently believe in justice catalyzing healing!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Creve Coeur Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Creve Coeur

Areas of Practice in Creve Coeur

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing specialist legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal help to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Slip Incidents

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents gain just payout for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending expert legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unfair Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Harm

Specializing in assisting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​