FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cullom

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be stressful and overwhelming. Prompt, skillful legal advice is crucial to secure rightful compensation. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in; experts in Illinois law governing Dog Bite Injuries, ensuring complete advocacy for your case from start to resolution. We understand every bite is unique, hence our approach considers all angles – animal behavior analysis to medical evaluations. By choosing us, you gain access to professional expertise with a track record of efficacious outcomes for similar cases – building a robust claim with vital supporting evidence that mirrors local laws and regulations effectively becomes second nature to us due its intricacy that we decipher daily. Safety and peace of mind regain their prominence when you entrust this ordeal with Carlson Bier – unyielding commitment coupled with unparalleled knowledge makes us an undeniably strong ally during these trying times! Don’t let geographical constraints deter you; bear in mind excellence knows no bounds – especially not at Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cullom Illinois

Dealing with an animal attack, especially a dog bite, can be a traumatic physical and emotional experience. A victim may grapple with pain, sudden medical expenses, permanent scarring, or sadly, disability. The Carlson Bier personal injury law firm based in Illinois acknowledges the immense distress that you are going through and we’re committed to easing your burdens by providing professional legal assistance.

The state of Illinois has specific laws regarding dog bite injuries which hold the dog owner liable for any damages sustained by an individual bitten by their pet. It doesn’t matter whether the owner knew about the violent tendencies of the dog previously or not; they will still be held responsible for all damages caused by their pet under a legal doctrine known as “strict liability”. This assures that as a victim, you stand strong chances to receive compensation with proper representation from professional lawyers like us at Carlson Bier.

There are some key elements to consider when it comes to Illinois’ Dog Bite Law:

– You must establish verifiable proof that the defendant owns the dog.

– Emphasize without ambiguity that you were conducting yourself peaceably when attacked.

– Show convincingly that you did not provoke the animal in any way.

At Carlson Bier, we have expert attorneys who specialize in handling cases related to dog bites. We painstakingly investigate every detail of each case ensuring all necessary evidence is gathered – including comprehensive medical reports documenting extent of injury and required treatments. Furthermore, we also seek testimony from witnesses if available and consult with experts for opinions regarding long-term effects of such injuries.

Moreover, being aware of your rights is indispensable when pursuing justice after suffering a canine assault. For instance:

– As per Section 16 of Illinois’ Animal Attacks or Injuries Act allows victims two years after incident date to file a lawsuit against offending parties.

– You could claim compensation including medical bills incurred due to bite-related injuries; loss earnings during recovery period; physical & mental trauma suffered; and cost of any cosmetic surgery required to correct disfigurement.

Our attorneys at Carlson Bier not only empathize with your situation, but also keenly understand the complexities surrounding litigations involving animal attacks. We value clear, transparent case building and strategic representation aimed at securing optimal compensation for you. From accurately documenting your injuries to confidently advocating in court on your behalf, rest assured that with our airtight legal representation, claiming justice will be a streamlined process.

As you navigate through the aftermath of this unfortunate event, addressing financial implications should not add up to your burdens. Hence we operate on a contingency fee basis – which implies that you pay us only when we successfully win or settle your case favorably.

At the Carlson Bier law firm, we are committed to turning intimidating legal hassles into manageable experiences for individuals recovering from dog bite inflicted trauma. Whether negotiating aggressively with insurers who may be hesitant to acknowledge full severity of your injury or being relentless warriors representing you in courtroom– whenever it comes down fighting for getting what’s rightfully yours – You can rely on us!

Before taking any step further though: Do you know how much potentially could be worth? Let’s find out now! There’s an easy way – all it takes is one click on the button below and our experts will evaluate specific details pertaining to assistance in deciphering potential worth of claim heap offered by those unwelcome canine assaults amidst everyday peaceful routine…So go ahead, make move toward reclaiming control over life after such traumatic experience – click here NOW!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cullom Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cullom

Areas of Practice in Cullom

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Clinical Misconduct

Offering specialist legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending adept legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Accidents

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Birth Traumas

Extending legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents secure just compensation for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing specialist legal assistance for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in ensuring specialized legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to representing clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440