...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dahlgren

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been a victim of dog bite injuries in Dahlgren, it’s imperative to seek best-in-class legal representation. At Carlson Bier, our expertise lies specifically in personal injury matters, with an emphasis on dog bite cases. Our accomplished lawyers effectively understand the nuances that distinguish such incidents and impacts on victims’ lives. This understanding aligns with their commitment to deliver personalized service aimed at securing rightful compensation for your ordeal. Beyond Dahlgren’s boundaries, we’ve proven our mettle through impressive won cases and satisfied clients over the years across Illinois. This successful record stands as unfiltered testament of our legal dexterity within this complex landscape of personal trauma law. We’re driven by passion to fight for justice; when you choose us as your representative against any Dog Bite Injuries contention – expect nothing less than relentless dedication towards your cause coupled with Bosnia-level professionalism that sets forth this unwavering pursuit for righting wrongs done unto innocent victims.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dahlgren Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be severe and inflict both physical pain and mental stress. At Carlson Bier, based in Illinois, we are personal injury attorneys dedicated to helping victims of dog bite incidents get the justice they deserve. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 4.7 million dog bites occur annually in the United States. Many of these are serious enough to require immediate medical treatment due to risk factors like infection, nerve damage, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Understanding your rights can significantly increase the potential compensation you might receive after a traumatic event such as a dog bite injury. The legal framework around this falls under ‘strict liability laws’ within our jurisdiction here in Illinois. Meaning- if someone’s dog bites another person without provocation; the owner is held responsible regardless of whether they were aware that their dog might behave aggressively.

Few crucial elements included within strict liability laws include:

•The victim did not provoke the attack.

•The victim had lawful right to be at location where attack occurred.

•Dog’s behavior caused an actual injury or harm which could also involve fear of an imminent attack leading to consequential injury e.g., breaking a bone while trying to escape.

It’s also paramount that you’re aware what steps need following if you’re involved in a dog bite incident:

•Get urgent medical attention: Your safety should always take precedence; seek immediate medical care even if injuries seem minor initially.

•Document everything: Take pictures of your wounds before getting treated and try recording detailed notes about circumstances surrounding the incident.

•Keep track of expenses: Consistently document all costs related—medical bills or lost wages from missing work due to recovery time.

One must report such incidents promptly—an essential task as many municipalities have deadlines regarding filing reports with local animal control authorities.

At Carlson Bier, our expertise as personal injury lawyers comes from years spent fighting for victims’ rights in cases like yours. Our team will diligently work alongside you to ensure documentation is prepared correctly, facts are meticulously gathered in your favor and the best legal strategies implemented. Our goal remains steadfastly focused on ensuring you receive full and fair monetary compensation for the physical injuries, emotional trauma, lost wages, and other damages stemming from the dog bite incident.

Another essential factor to remember is: time is critical when dealing with personal injury claims. Under Illinois law, generally victims of dog bites have a two-year statute of limitations post-injury date within which their cases need filing. Missing this deadline could forfeit any right to seek compensation—ungeared attention then becomes absolutely pivotal.

In closing- navigating through complexities presented by legal procedures can feel challenging after suffering an emotionally traumatic experience such as a dog bite injury. Trusting expert attorneys like us at Carlson Bier can provide peace while also maximizing your chances of getting deserving compensation– all while you focus on recovery.

If you’ve been victim to a dog bite injury or know someone who’s suffered from one; let Carlson Bier fight for what rightfully belongs to you. Reach out today! Need more information about Illinois personal injury laws or curious about potential award payouts? Click on the button below for our complimentary case evaluation tool that might help estimate how much your case could potentially be worth. Remember – You are not just a client; you’re our priority – at Carlson Bier we’re continually striving towards offering excellent service mixed with compassionate care for each individual case we handle.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dahlgren Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dahlgren

Areas of Practice in Dahlgren

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering expert legal support for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending professional legal support for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Trip Injuries

Adept in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents receive just payout for injuries and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Incident

Extending adept legal services for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Impairments

Expert in providing professional legal advice for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Expert in advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​