...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dalzell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to Dog Bite Injuries, the legal team at Carlson Bier is unrivaled in their dedication and expertise. Serving clients even from places like Dalzell with intricate knowledge of Illinois state law, they handle each case with precision, care and profound understanding. As an experienced personal injury law firm situated within Illinois, our attorneys are skilled professionals attuned to your needs. We aggressively advocate for our clients’ rights when faced with any dog bite-related incidents or accidents that lead to injuries.

Choosing Carlson Bier implies a comprehensive service; we tirelessly work on gathering evidence, dealing medical bills providers and negotiating compensation settlements for you while guiding you through the complex litigation landscape of Dog Bite Injuries laws.

Being a part of Illinois’s trusted network of personal injury lawyers has made us true experts in handling all aspects of such unfortunate incident cases in this region including Dalzell without violating provincial regulations relating locations.

Our key differentiator is not just fighting for your right but helping ensure that similar situations gets prevented by holding negligent parties accountable since prevention too is paramount. Eliminating ambiguity whilst ensuring justice is served – Choose Carlson Bier as your preferred attorney group today!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dalzell Illinois

Every year, thousands of people become unfortunate victims of dog bite injuries. The law firm of Carlson Bier has extensive experience in representing such clients who have been unjustly injured by another person’s pet dog. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we are well-versed in the laws pertaining to these unique cases and can guide you through the complex legal procedure that follows such an incident.

Dog bite injuries can range from minor cuts or bruises to more severe outcomes like fractures, deep tissue wounds, nerve damage – not forgetting the emotional trauma that victims may suffer. Moreover, medical treatment following a dog bite can be quite expensive and could include hospital stays, plastic surgeries or psychological counseling. Sadly enough, without professional legal assistance many victims fail to receive fair compensation for their injuries.

When faced with a dog bite incident it is crucial to know your rights under Illinois state law:

• Victims are entitled to compensation: If someone else’s pet injures you out of negligence or aggression, you have a right to receive financial recovery for all costs related directly to your injury.

• Liability rests with the owner: It’s up to the owners of dogs to make sure their pets do not cause harm or damages; failure on part leads them liable for any injury suffered.

• Statute of limitations: Dog bite victims in Illinois have two years from the date of the incident within which they need to initiate legal action against the owner.

Handling such cases require knowledge, skill and understanding – and at Carlson Bier we excel at giving our clients what they deserve. Our team will examine every facet of your case minutely—right from evaluating medical reports, interviewing witnesses if any,to negotiating with troublesome insurance companies so as alleviate as much stress off your shoulders as possible.

Our proven track record speaks volumes about our dedication towards fighting on behalf of victims suffering due to negligent pet owners,and hence making sure every client we work with receives justice along with right compensation.

We understand that no two dog bite injury cases are alike—which is why we customize our approach towards each case reflecting every client’s distinctive needs. Our team conducts a thorough analysis of all damages, be it physical or emotional harm and consequent financial losses which include medical costs, lost wages from the inability to work along with any other miscellaneous expenses you may have had to bear.

The legal process surrounding personal injuries due to dog bites can be daunting, especially when dealing with subsequent traumas and mounting medical bills. But by arming yourself with the right legal representation, it doesn’t need to feel overwhelming. No one should suffer in silence, nor finance their own recovery for an incident caused due to someone else’s pet.

Carlson Bier has been committed to empowering victims of dog bites and helping them navigate through complex local laws across Illinois’ jurisdictions. While navigating these murky waters can prove difficult alone,the good news is—you don’t have to! We invite you cordially upon your journey toward healing, fairness,and justice— let us handle the difficult parts while you focus on recovering.

As a law firm serving various areas throughout Illinois, although we do not operate from a physical office in Dalzell and cannot advertise ourselves as such; rest assured that regardless of your location within this state, Carlson Bier is prepared,and more than willing to go extra mile ensuring you receive top-notch professional legal services.

Feel free to consult our experienced teams,talk about personalized solutions we might offer,and find out how much your case could potentially be worth.Our primary goal is making sure that you’re reimbursed fully for the unfortunate incident involving dog bite—and ultimately bringing some relief during otherwise tumultuous times.So don’t keep guessing,but lend an end today itself—click on the button below and realize how Carlson Bier can transform this traumatic experience into one where fair justice triumphs!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dalzell Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dalzell

Areas of Practice in Dalzell

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Supplying skilled legal help for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal help to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Tumble Occurrences

Expert in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents get equitable compensation for wounds and losses.

Bike Crashes

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Incident

Extending experienced legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Construction Collisions

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to extending professional legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Expert in representing persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer