...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Danforth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Danforth, if you have been a victim of dog bite injuries and require legal assistance, Carlson Bier is the foremost option for assuring your rights are defended. Specializing as personal injury attorneys with extensive experience in cases involving such incidents, our commitment is to provide unrelenting legal support that goes beyond conventional standards. Our expertise stems from a thorough understanding of Illinois’ complex laws on dog bites. We meticulously scrutinize every element surrounding the incident—nature and extent of wounds sustained, behavioral history of the animal involved—to construct an impervious case on behalf of our clients. Our reputation as tenacious advocates is built upon our track record; countless successful outcomes obtained right where it matters most: in courtrooms throughout Illinois make us uniquely qualified to handle your critical situation professionally and compassionately. Carlson Bier offers not just comprehensive representation but also empathy during these distressing times to ensure justice prevails for victims like yourself who’ve had their lives unduly affected by unforeseen dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Danforth Illinois

The attorneys at Carlson Bier understand the nuances of dog bite injuries, a complex yet crucial area within personal injury law. Our Illinois-based team possesses extensive expertise and knowledge, bringing unparalleled value through our commitment to fighting for those affected by these terrifying experiences.

Dog bites can cause significant physical harm and emotional trauma. Victims are often left with far-reaching effects that go well beyond the initial attack, including scarring, infections, psychological distress and potential disease transmission like rabies. The liability may vary depending on state laws and specific circumstances surrounding the attack; understanding this critical aspect is vital in planning your claim.

• The dog’s owner may be held liable if they knew their pet was dangerous but failed to restrain it properly.

• Depending on state stipulations, compensation claims can include medical expenses, lost income (if you had to take time off work due to the injury), pain and suffering or disfigurement.

• In some cases where negligence occurred – such as a violation of leash law – punitive damages might be added to the settlement amount.

Countless variables exist around each case; thus an experienced legal advocate becomes essential for victims considering pursuing litigation against a negligent party responsible for the attack. In dog bite cases, it is not only about recovering from physical injuries but also compensating for losses experienced in all areas of life as consequence.

Carlson Bier offers exceptional representation backed by decades of collective experience navigating challenging legal landscapes successfully. Whether gathering evidence that proves owner liability or negotiating fair settlements reflective of comprehensive loss experienced by our clients—we pledge relentless pursuit towards securing optimal outcomes for those we represent.

Navigating personal injury litigation alone can feel overwhelming amid recovery struggles post-accident—partnering with Carlson Bier carries multiple benefits:

• We possess intimate familiarity concerning local regulations that dictate litigation proceedings related Texan Dog Bite Laws —a focused lens transferrable uniquely to your case circumstances.

• Our fee structure revolves around contingency meaning—you don’t owe us unless we win your case—a testament to our commitment, confidence, and alignment with client interests at heart.

• As a firm deeply entrenched within Illinois’s legal framework—we appropriately position ourselves to provide comprehensive services adhering strictly to regulatory obligations— a mandate that fiercely protects client rights.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier understand the need for aggressive representation following such harrowing incidents. We are here to support, guide, and fight on behalf of dog bite victims through every challenging legal hurdle en route their justice pursuit — aiding them in reclaiming control over lives inevitably disrupted by unexpected dog bite injuries.

Carlson Bier emphasizes transparent attorney-client communication throughout lawsuit journeys—from the initial consultation until case conclusion—we diligently chart personalized paths carved exclusively around unique circumstances underlying each client’s situation—an approach that ensures each claim receives rightful attention it indispensably deserves.

However complicated your case might appear—count on expertise Carlson Bier offers as an experienced personal injury law firm based strictly within Illinois jurisdiction boundaries—we promise dedicated investment required in pursuing fair compensation you deserve vastly navigating legal complexities post levee.

Determined to acquire accurate reflection about what your case worth is? Waste no more time wading through uncertainties alone! Let Carlson Bier contribute our trained scrutiny—the efficient path to clarity concerning how much eligible recompense potentially moderated via clickable button below. Empower yourself today; accuracy obtainable just one click away encourages essential first step onto recovery road peppered with victorious landmarks ahead!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danforth Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Danforth

Areas of Practice in Danforth

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending expert legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Slip Occurrences

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Infant Harms

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents secure fair recompense for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Incident

Delivering adept legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in providing specialized legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Focused on defending clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​