FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Danforth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we know the devastating impact of slip and fall accidents. In such moments, securing just compensation can make all the difference in reaching a positive resolution. As leading Illinois-based personal injury lawyers specializing in maximizing settlements for slip and fall victims, our skilled team is committed to delivering personalized legal counsel that puts your interests first. With extensive experience litigating these kinds of cases across various jurisdictions including Danforth, we understand how to navigate complex legal terrain effectively to win fair compensation for your pain and suffering. We’re adept at documenting evidence swiftly that proves negligence by property owners or managers – vital proof needed in any premises liability claim. Our track record speaks volumes about our unique ability to bring clarity amidst confusing circumstances intrinsic with slip and fall lawsuits; Carlson Bier remains an esteemed choice for anyone seeking top-tier representation without compromise on quality or attention detail but with absolute adherence to all ethical guidelines within Illinois laws.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Danforth Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier page, a renowned personal injury law firm based in Illinois. We understand that you’re here because you may have experienced difficulties following a slip and fall accident, one of the most common types of accidents leading to severe injuries. Slip and fall incidents can occur on wet surfaces in grocery stores, icy sidewalks or even due to mismanaged properties. Irrespective of its place and cause, such an accident can lead to significant physical suffering compounded by financial strain.

The crux of these cases lies in proving liability; it necessitates showing that the property owner was negligent concerning their premises’ upkeep or didn’t provide adequate warning about potential hazards. At Carlson Bier, our skilled attorneys rigorously scrutinize every aspect of your case ensuring nothing is overlooked:

• Identifying if unsafe conditions existed

• Assessing whether neglect on the part of property owner contributed directly to your unfortunate incident

• Evaluating if reasonable steps were taken by property owners to prevent such occurrences

It’s also vital to realize that according to Illinois premise liability laws, landowners aren’t automatically blamed for any slip or fall accident occurring on their grounds. What’s key here is connecting it with an identifiable failure – negligence towards safety protocol or poorly maintained premises that could have been acted upon timely.

One confusing arena within slip and fall lawsuits revolves around concepts like ‘comparative negligence.’ This establishes what extent we contributed out own actions towards resulting mishap. Experts at Carlson Bier are capable interpreters when it comes to these intricate legal terminologies making sense through complexities for clients:

• Our knowledge helps you comprehend how comparative negligence might impact your claims

• Education regarding statutes limitation prevailing over personal injury cases

• Evoking client awareness about paper-trail criticality supporting incident aftermath like medical reports & expenses

Our dedicated team understands traumatic experiences which people undergo post-accident along with associated isolation feelings during recovery process. Aware about mounting anxieties over astronomical medical bills or wage losses, we empathize with your scenario and provide top-class legal representation. Our goal isn’t just to make you aware of your rights but also ensure restitutions are sought aggressively from parties who’ve exhibited negligence leading to your unfortunate accident.

Recognizing unique aspects tied with each case is an attribute we pride ourselves upon at Carlson Bier. Through personalized client approach combined with our vast professional experience, we have facilitated clients win fair settlements despite facing powerful opposition. Whether it involves going head-to-head against mighty insurance corporations or reputable business establishments, this has only reaffirmed our commitment towards offering apt compensation justice for harmed individuals in the state of Illinois.

At Carlson Bier, you’re never alone during your time most difficult phase: injury aftermath causing minced health condition along burdened finances. With skillful legal consultation at discrete matters within personal injury claims related slip or fall accidents, you will find immediate answers to impending uncertainties caused due to sufferings.

Is there a lingering question regarding your specific situation that needs addressing? Want more insights about how much might be claimable atop receiving compassionate legal advice from seasoned attorneys? Do not hesitate any further and click on the button below. Discover how experts can help transform dreaded uncertainties into actionable plan ensuring deserved litigation recovery best suiting case potentiality that awaits ahead for you at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danforth Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Danforth

Areas of Practice in Danforth

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering expert legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Specialist in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing experienced legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Building Crashes

Focused on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Committed to offering specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440