FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Danforth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury, the legal complexities can be overwhelming. This is why it’s essential to entrust your case with Carlson Bier, where expert attorneys possess an extensive understanding of Illinois personal injury law and are committed to fighting for your rights. They specialize in advocating for victims of spinal cord injuries and strive to ensure that compensation claims reflect the full scope of each client’s personal and financial losses. The primary mission at Carlson Bier is not merely obtaining redress; they aim into provide comprehensive support during this distressing period by managing each intricate aspect from medical records review to litigation proceedings if required.They undertake every effort within their capability through individualized strategies tailored towards your unique situation thereby enhancing the likelihood of successful results.Proudly lowering these burdensome barriers gives you much needed respite while they tirelessly engage on behalf of you.Choosing Carlson Bier means aligning with action-oriented defenders ready persistently guide & advocate ensuring fair resolution embodied by deserved justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Danforth Illinois

Spinal cord injuries can lead to dire and often irreversible consequences that affect an individual’s ability to work, live independently, or maintain a standard quality of life. At Carlson Bier, we have spent years advocating for victims of such severe personal injuries. Located in Illinois, our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys understands the intricacies involved with spinal trauma cases.

Spinal cord damage often results from traumatic events such as car accidents, motorcycle crashes, falls from height or recreational sports mishaps. During these incidents, the spine may incur fractures or dislocations which harm the nerves within it – leading to conditions ranging from limited mobility issues to complete paralysis.

Recovering individuals may face significant adversity like high medical bills, loss of employment due to disability, emotional distress and drastic lifestyle changes. Here at Carlson Bier we know each case is distinct with its own set of complexities; nevertheless there are some common key aspects about spinal cord injury lawsuits one should comprehend:

– Importance Of Timeliness: The sooner legal action is taken after an incident the higher your chances become for a successful claim.

– Determining Liability: To win a lawsuit it’s imperative to identify responsible parties such as negligent drivers or companies.

– Medical Documentation: Validating your claim necessitates concrete evidence like medical records and expert testimonies detailing how the injury directly resulted from said incident.

– Long-term Impact Consideration: It’s crucial when calculating compensation amounts to incorporate not only immediate expenses but also forthcoming costs related to ongoing care and lost earnings potential.

This process can be daunting – especially if you’re dealing with life-altering consequences brought upon by spinal trauma at the same time. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in; lessening this burden by bringing under our wing all tasks related to litigation so that you can primarily focus on recovery during this trying period.

Our solid track record reflects our commitment towards providing comprehensive support tailored specifically for victims experiencing grievous injuries resulting in lifelong impairments. We meticulously investigate each case and employ all available resources to secure ample compensation for our clients – an attribute that has built us a steadfast reputation in personal injury litigation within Illinois.

We understand the pricelessness of maintaining autonomy over one’s life and the frustration when unwarranted accidents rob you of it. At Carlson Bier, we fight to reclaim what can be salvaged –whether it’s peace of mind knowing medical bills won’t rupture your financial stability or validation for suffering endured through obtaining maximum deserved compensation.

To put it candidly – spinal cord mishaps aren’t mere personal injuries but extreme life-altering tragedies. As such, they need more than simple legal representation; they deserve comprehensive advocacy offered by a firm expert in this type of excellent personalized service like Carlson Bier.

Deciding on taking legal recourse following spinal injury isn’t easy; agreeing upon who should represent you during this plight shouldn’t add further complexity at exceedingly challenging times like these. Choosing experienced attorneys significantly lessens the trauma often associated with pursuing personal injury claims while maximizing odds for winning rightful restitution.

Don’t let worries regarding future piles of medical bill or lack of earning hamper your path towards fulfilling recovery and rehabilitation after a detrimental event. Believe us when we say- You’re not alone in navigating these tumultuous waters post-spinal cord accident.

So why wait? Take your first step towards pursuing justice today! Scroll down and click on the button below to discover how much your case might be worth with Carlson Bier’s personalised consultation services specifically designed keeping you at their forefront focus during adversity so grim. Let us transform abstract concepts into tangible actions so healthier tomorrows aren’t just hopeful expectations rather definite realities – because again at banishing injustice from lives already disarrayed by unfortunate circumstances is no mere occupation for us; instead, we consider it as our utmost duty at Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danforth Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Danforth

Areas of Practice in Danforth

Cycling Accidents

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing skilled legal assistance for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying skilled legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Slip Incidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents receive reasonable payout for hurts and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Ensuring expert legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Specializing in offering specialized legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in advocating for individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440