FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Danvers

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier represents clients subjected to dog bite injuries with a high level of expertise, commitment and sensitivity. Based in Illinois, we are adept at navigating the intricacies of animal laws and are equipped to handle petitions efficiently across diverse cities, including Danvers. With unprecedented proficiency specifically in matters related to Dog Bite Injuries, our team recognizes that dealing with such adverse situations requires more than just legal counsel — personal understanding and moral support is just as crucial. This approach has cemented us as reliable legal allies for victims coping with the aftermath of dreaded canine attacks. We meticulously work through each case from underpinning facts investigation all the way to negotiations or trial proceedings if required. Selecting Carlson Bier guarantees specialized assistance driven by both passion and professionalism with your best interest at heart every step of the journey; indeed making us an excellent choice for your Dog Bite Injuries attorney needs.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Danvers Illinois

Experience the best legal representation at Carlson Bier, a renowned personal injury law firm situated in Illinois. As experts in the field of personal injury law, we have an impressive track record of dog bite injuries cases to our credit. We firmly believe that education is power and through this segment, we aim to enlighten you about various aspects of lawsuits related to dog bite injuries.

Dog bites can indeed be traumatic and may lead to severe physical as well as psychological consequences for victims. Understanding your rights and knowing how to proceed if you or someone you love has been bitten by a dog is critical. Investing in professional legal aid might make all the difference between a stress-filled process and attaining fair compensation seamlessly.

• Evidence Collection: The foundation stone of any personal injury lawsuit revolves around concrete evidence collection – photographs or videos of the location, medical reports detailing the extent of injury, etc.

• Identifying Liability: Many dog owners don’t realize their responsibilities until after an incident occurs. Yet according to Illinois law, it’s mandatory for them to maintain control over their pets all times using leashes and muzzles as necessary. This responsibility doesn’t waiver whether they knew of aggressive tendencies or not.

• Documenting Damages: Document everything from quantifiable damages like medical bills or lost wages due from time off work, down to non-quantifiable factors such as pain suffering or emotional trauma inflicted due the incident.

In assessing liability alongside potential damage causes following a dog bite injury, it becomes crucially important that clients understand several key components within Illinois’ Dog Bite Law:

Firstly, once ownership is established (the person who had direct control over the animal at time), parties involved need not prove negligence on part owner’s behalf only violation leash laws are required show . Secondly there’s no ‘one bite rule’- even first-time offenders can face charges irrespective previously exhibited violent conduct; also homeowners insurance typically covers such incidents assuring victims fair compensation.

Lastly, the timeline is a major factor; under Illinois’ statute of limitations for personal injury lawsuits to be filed within two years from date incident transpired.

Protecting your rights and securing just compensation isn’t simply about the now – it’s essentially safeguarding your future against escalating medical bills or loss of earning potential later. We at Carlson Bier specialize in these types of cases and our goal is to work tirelessly on your behalf so that you don’t have to bear this burden alone. With us handling the intricacies of your claim, you can focus more on healing and recovery while we ensure that justice is served.

It can indeed get overwhelming trying to understand all the legal aspects involved in navigating dog bite injuries litigation, especially when you might be dealing with physical pain or emotional aftermath simultaneously. This is where Carlton Bier comes into play as your trusted partner – leveraging our legal prowess alongside deep-seated knowledge about dog bite laws specifically in Illinois. We strive for nothing less than impeccable service standards, one client at a time.

In bringing this informative segment to an end, we urge you not to let apprehensions hold back any longer from seeking the best possible outcome following a traumatic event like a dog bite injury. In fact, are you curious how much value your case could possibly hold? Please click on the button below for further insights because every single victim deserves full recompense – and we are dedicated towards making sure that happens for YOU!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danvers Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Danvers

Areas of Practice in Danvers

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering expert legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering expert legal services for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying specialist legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Stumble Incidents

Professional in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for hurts and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring experienced legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Focused on offering professional legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Expert in supporting patients with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​