Medical Malpractice Attorney in Danvers

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a potential medical malpractice situation, the experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier are your strongest allies. With a reputation for legal excellence across Illinois you can trust us to fight rigorously on your behalf; and whether it’s in Danvers or any other city within the state, our commitment remains unflinching. What distinguishes Carlson Bier? It’s not just our subject matter expertise or illustrious track record but also tenacity and compassion that define us. Our lawyers delve deeply into every case, tirelessly working to ensure justice is served to those detrimentally affected due to medical negligence. We understand that every client deserves uncompromised representational quality; hence we proactively navigate through complex processes involved in identifying healthcare providers’ errors thereby supporting claims of victims efficiently and effectively! Trusting Carlson Bier ensures comprehensive investigation, thorough preparation whilst arming yourself with top-notch legal representation against formidable defendants like hospitals or insurance firms.A choice of strength,a choice reassurance- choose wisely…choose Carlson Bier because Medical Malpractice demands more than ordinary handling: it demands toughness coupled with skilled dexterity from noteworthy practitioners.Jury verdicts remember winners – Let’s create history together!

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Danvers Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in dealing with personal injury claims specifically related to medical malpractice. It is paramount for potential clients to understand the complexities surrounding medical malpractice issues. By definition, medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider deviates from the recognized standard of care while treating a patient, thereby causing harm or damage.

In Illinois, as across the United States, these deviations could range from misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis to surgical errors and wrongful death. The recognition of malpractices legally revolves around two critical elements. Firstly, that the standard of care expected from a practitioner was breached and secondly, this breach directly resulted in harm.

• Breach of the standard of care: This legal standard implies that all patients are entitled to receive suitable treatment corresponding to their conditions. Any negligence which compromises this right can be considered as a breach.

• Causation: Merely establishing a breach isn’t enough; plaintiffs must also prove that such negligence caused their injuries beyond reasonable doubt.

To successfully litigate a case on your behalf as your legal representative against powerful healthcare systems and insurance companies, our experienced team at Carlson Bier embarks on extensive research about every possible scenario regarding your case. We gather relevant evidence including expert testimonies if necessary which help us craft cogent arguments worthy of yielding positive outcomes for you.

Medical malpractice lawsuits are distinct due their statute limitations aspect – time restrictions within which injured victims must file lawsuits. In Illinois specifically, this period is typically two years from the date when an individual discovered (or should have reasonably discovered) their injuries; however not later than four years after actual occurrence of alleged negligent acts (with certain exceptions).

It’s also very important to know what type of compensation could potentially be recoverable in these kinds of cases:

• Medical expenses: Reimbursement for costs related to addressing injuries inflicted by medical malpractices.

• Loss of Earnings: To cover lost wages as result of reduced productivity or inability to work altogether due to sustained injuries.

• Pain and suffering: This compensation accounts for physical discomfort and emotional distress inflicted by medical malpractice.

• Loss of consortium: If the victim’s condition results in loss of companionship for their family, these damages may be recoverable.

Remember that Illinois follows modified comparative negligence rule which essentially means your total recovery can be reduced if you bear any portion of blame. Moreover, it’s important to note, unlike many states, Illinois doesn’t have a cap on medical malpractice damages – they’re determined case-by-case considering individual circumstances.

Navigating through these unique complexities requires an attorney who is deeply versed in the legal intricacies of healthcare and personal injury law. At Carlson Bier, we take pride in our commitment towards educating our clients about every aspect regarding their case – ensuring thorough understanding and enabling informed decisions.

Our team adopts customized strategies considering unique specifics highlighted by your case – passionately pursuing justice for you and your loved ones. Advocate your rights with expertise across various hospital systems throughout Illinois offering exceptional representation characterized by empathetic relationships – all based on trust, transparency and relentless pursuit for earning fair owed compensations.

Curious how different laws impact potential award amount specific to your case? Would you like experts from Carlson Bier evaluate merits pertaining to possible lawsuit against alleged practitioner or healthcare entity? We invite you delve deeper into meticulously prepared resources available right here online: Click below now for comprehensive evaluation estimating potential worth related to your case – absolutely free! Together let’s set new benchmarks fighting for justice!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danvers Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Danvers

Areas of Practice in Danvers

Bike Collisions

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving adept legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal services for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, offering professional legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Fall Injuries

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Accident

Extending professional legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in extending professional legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer