...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Danville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a dog bite incident occurs in Danville, it’s imperative to put your trust in experienced legal representation. Carlson Bier is synonymous with outstanding results and proven expertise. Over the years, our attorneys have dedicated themselves to protecting the rights of victims suffering from Dog Bite Injuries, delivering assertive legal action and striving towards securing maximum compensation. Our niche experience underscores our commitment to clients managing this particular type of personal injury – our team knows exactly what needs to be done when dealing with complex cases involving animal attacks; getting you justice remains at heart of everything we do. At Carlson Bier, compassion for victims melds seamlessly with an unwavering drive for strong advocacy against offender negligence or misconduct concerning dog bite injuries. We believe that every case deserves unique attention and crafted strategies relevant for gaining optimal results – qualities that assert Carlson Bier as the ideal choice when considering expert dog bite injury legal representation in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Danville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team unrelentingly offers legal support for victims of Dog Bite Injuries in the state of Illinois. As a renowned personal injury law firm, we diligently work on bringing justice and fair compensation to those who have experienced unpredictable and traumatic attacks from dogs in their everyday lives. Our specialized dog bite attorneys bridge the legal gap with vast experience, fortified dedication, and substantial knowledge surrounding these specific types of incidents.

Although dogs are often seen as lovable companions by many individuals across the globe, it is also essential to understand that these creatures can unpredictably cause severe harm under certain circumstances. Dog bites can result in various injuries including puncture wounds, lacerations, abrasions or contusions — leading to possible emotional distress or trauma. Furthermore, if left untreated properly or immediately after being bitten by a dog, there’s an increased risk of infections such as tetanus and rabies.

The expertise at Carlson Bier marries legal know-how with compassionate understanding when representing clients who’ve been involved in these unfortunate incidents.

• Comprehensive knowledge about Illinois laws pertaining to canine ownership and responsibilities

• A strong commitment toward ensuring fuller recoveries for victims by winning maximum compensation claims

• Handling each case aggressively yet empathetically

In such personal injury cases where emotions are high and tensions breaching the edge due its sensitive nature, we firmly believe that educating our potential clients is one among many paths towards healing. Here’s how we achieve these necessities;

• On initial consultation; Our capable attorneys will guide you through understanding your legal rights as a victim starting with free initial consultations.

• Case Preparation: We ensure evidence collection from owners neglecting their duty to train or restrain their pets appropriately which strengthens your claim.

• Effective Negotiation: Our lawyers possess comprehensive skills to negotiate your rightful compensation aggressively against potentially hard-bargaining insurance companies.

• Litigation Support: If negotiation fails meeting justice; fear not! We’ll take your case to court rallying for your rights with utmost dedication.

Canine ownership comes in tandem with specific responsibilities. As per Illinois law, the owners can be held legally responsible if their dog bites or injures another person — unless, the victim was trespassing or provoked the dog. Identity of the dog’s owner, whether it has up-to-date rabies shots or any prior history of aggression; all contributes to shaping a sharp argument for claiming your deserving compensation from negligent owners.

While you focus on recovering and getting back to normalcy after such fraught incidents; let Carlson Bier attorneys navigate through this legal labyrinth ensuring justice prevails. By choosing us as your personal injury lawyers following a traumatic episode of a dog bite incident, you’ll not only equip yourself professionally but also garner much-needed peace-of-mind amidst whirlwind occurrences.

Clicking on the button below will allow our capable team at Carlson Bier to provide an estimation about how much your case could potentially be worth. Despite each claim varying based on individual circumstances surrounding dog-bite injuries – rest assured we’ve got solid experience handling these claims with conciseness dealing out justice fairly.

By selecting Carlson Bier as your professional ally in these turbulent times simply symbolizes easing the journey towards rightful justice while also gaining powerful knowledge over rights as victims of Dog Bite Injuries within Illinois jurisdiction boundaries. It’s time that you receive deserved compensation following unpredictable canine-caused trials life threw at you! So why wait when a click today might answer questions brewing within regarding rightful financial recovery against unprecedented episodes? Hit that below button now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Danville

Areas of Practice in Danville

Bike Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing skilled legal services for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Malpractice

Extending specialist legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents get appropriate payout for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Incident

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to providing compassionate legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to representing persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​