...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Davis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be traumatising and dealing with the aftermath is often overwhelming. Carlson Bier, your diligent personal injury attorneys, are committed to protecting victims in Davis who have been harmed by such circumstances. Skilled in defending dog bite injuries cases with fierce dedication, they champion for you every step of the way—striving for full compensation and ensuring justice prevails. Their proud track record showcases their experience tackling multifaceted treatments costs or loss of earnings cases that many suffer as a result of these unfortunate incidents. Highly accessible and compassionate, Carlson Bier leaves no stone unturned while perusing your case details—and this meticulous approach sets them apart from the rest. Rooted firmly in Illinois law and ethical guidelines; they believe legal representation should reflect absolute commitment to clients’ wellbeing—which is exactly what you get when Carlson Bier becomes your chosen representative―a formidable ally towards securing justice post-dog-bite trauma! Turn to Corporate Brier today: prioritizing client care without compromising on uncompromising advocacy!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Davis Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be severe and traumatizing. As the victim, you may at times feel disoriented not knowing what steps to take or where to turn for help. At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical torment and emotional strain brought on by such a harrowing incident. Our distinguished personal injury attorneys in Illinois have extensive experience representing victims of dog attacks. Our primary goal is to enforce your rights under Illinois law whilst ensuring you receive considerable compensation for any damages or suffering caused.

Illinois statute recognizes liability when it comes to dog bites. Essentially, these laws establish that pet owners are solely responsible for injuries inflicted upon others by their pets if they attack or try to attack without provocation, and the injured party was acting peaceably and not trespassing on the property inhabited by the dog.

Understanding this law helps one gain insight into what needs to be done post an incident;

• Ensure Your Safety: Find somewhere safe away from the aggressive dog.

• Seek Medical Care: Obtain immediate medical attention which only provides proof of injury but also mitigates potential health complications.

• Report The Incident: Notify animal control or local law enforcement about what happened.

• Gather Information: Contact information from witnesses, pictures of your wounds before treatment begins coupled with detailed info about where and how this attack transpired can prove invaluable later.

• Contact A Personal Injury Attorney: Make sure you get a free consultation with professional legal advice on how best to document and prosecute your case.

At Carlson Bier, our team deeply appreciates every client’s individual set of circumstances surrounding their cases… Thus every client receives personalized assistance aimed at alleviating stress while facilitating a quicker recovery process…

Dog bite-related claims incorporate more than just obvious physical harm. They often encompass both financial losses as well as emotional tolls exacted by such incidents…. Mental affliction suffered manifesting as anxiety or fear whenever dogs are around… Lost wages due to missing work during the recovery period… The cost of therapy and counseling services required to heal emotional wounds…

Our dedicated team walks you through every step. We meticulously compile all necessary evidence supporting your claim, safeguarding that all financial aspects including hidden costs or expenses potentially overlooked are catered for….

Moreover, we routinely negotiate with insurance companies ensuring our clients receive fair settlement offers. In circumstances where these companies prove unyielding, we’re willing and prepared to fearlessly pursue justice in court.

At Carlson Bier, you are never just a case number; rather a valued individual deserving unwavering support during such challenging times. Every member at our firm is resolute about fighting for your rights and holding those responsible liable for their malevolence.

Facing the aftermath of a dog bite alone doesn’t have to be your reality. Real help exists…You deserve more than just financial compensation; but also an opportunity to reclaim peace of mind… At Carlson Bier, it’s not solely about winning cases but restoring life normalcy post such traumatic experiences…

Don’t grapple with the stress and uncertainty any longer. Take advantage of the wealth of knowledge masterfully condensed in this brief guide on Illinois dog-bite laws by clicking on the button tab below Wrap up this ordeal knowing exactly what your case could potentially garner while receiving assistance from premier personal injury attorneys sincerely invested in your cause – who will treat you like family as opposed to simply another file number…… Experience unrivaled excellence with Carlson Bier today! It’s time not only to assert but also affirm your legal rights emerging victorious on this quest for justice against careless dog owners.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Davis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Davis

Areas of Practice in Davis

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending professional legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering specialist legal advice for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing adept legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Aged Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Trip Mishaps

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Crash

Extending adept legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Harm

Specializing in assisting victims with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​