FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Davis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you, or a loved one recently experienced the traumatic after-effects of a pedestrian accident in Davis? Carlson Bier, an exceptionally skilled personal injury attorney group in Illinois, is here to support you. We deeply understand that after such adverse incidents, the road to recovery can be steep and daunting both emotionally and financially. That’s why our expertise comes into play. With proven legal aptitude extending across years of resolving clients’ complex pedestrian accidents claims assertively yet empathetically; we endeavor to ensure your rightful reimbursement is granted timely thereby minimizing distress as much as possible. What sets us apart from others is our commitment towards personalized attention and dedication delivered with unconditional transparency; facts solidified by countless successful negotiations & lawsuits we’ve aggressively fought for victims over time. So if post-accident complications loom ahead or if you’re unsure about the intricacies wrapped around insurance policies & fault determination – trust none other than Carlson Bier – Your strongest legal ally whenever needed!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Davis Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have a dedicated team of Personal Injury Attorneys serving residents throughout Illinois with expertise in handling all aspects of Pedestrian Accident cases. We understand that such traumatic accidents can have irreparable impacts on the lives of victims and their families – financially, emotionally, physically as well as mentally. Hence, our ethos remains undeterred: to provide steadfast legal representation to those who need it most during these challenging times.

Pedestrian Accidents often entail complex scenarios with several factors at play. Not all incidents are just ‘accidents’, many generally involve negligence or wrongful conduct – where you may be entitled to receive compensation for any losses incurred. From distracted driving and speeding to ignoring traffic signals, pedestrian right-of-way is frequently violated by reckless motorists leading to unforeseen accidents.

• Distracted Driving: A moment’s diversion could lead to a major accident affecting an innocent pedestrian’s life drastically.

• Speeding: High speed reduces reaction times for drivers making it difficult for them to prevent collisions.

• Ignoring Traffic Signals: Drivers breaking traffic rules endanger pedestrians’ safety and violate their rights at crossing places.

We believe in offering insight and sharing knowledge about the potential complexities involved. We hope this can empower victims or their loved ones with understanding pertinent details before deciding on pursuing a case.

The immediate effects of a Pedestrian Accident are tangible – injuries or worse fatalities; but there remain hidden damages too like long-term medical care costs, lost wages due to inability to work, psychological distress etc., which might not strike immediately but may become daunting over time.

• Bodily Injuries: They range from minor scrapes & bruises escalating up towards severe harm such as fractures or brain injuries.

• Invalidity Costs: These encompass therapeutic treatment expenses ensuring recuperation with possible extended hospital stays.

• Lost Income: Income loss occurs if the victim turns unable sustain working capabilities post-incident causing economic hardship.

• Psychological Trauma: Often overlooked, psychological trauma can have devastating effects on the victim’s overall quality of life.

At Carlson Bier, we strive to ensure you receive the maximum compensation possible for your suffering and losses endured. Our attorneys meticulously analyze all aspects of an incident right from obtaining evidence, interviewing witnesses, assessing damage reports towards building an undeniable case against responsible parties involved.

Our end goal? To not let these accidents just fade away as unfortunate incidents but to make responsible individuals held accountable justly in face of law. We aim in bringing about a perceptible change addressing reckless driving behaviors ensuring safer roads for every pedestrian out there.

Our expertise has garnered us recognition across Illinois as reliable Personal Injury Attorneys known by our trademark legal diligence and unwavering commitment towards our clients’ rights. Our individualized approach represents every client uniquely tailored according to their specific circumstance adding immense value to case endeavors undertaken.

The journey from surviving an accident through enduring injuries towards achieving much-deserved justice typically seems daunting. But with our steadfast legal guidance maneuvering intricacies becomes less strenuous allowing victims or their families focus better on seeking healthy recovery instead.

Assessing fair compensation deserves professional expertise – at Carlson Bier we offer just that alongside making you understand how Illinois laws apply to your unique situation. Remember, no two cases are alike; they depend upon specifics related directly or indirectly to an incident varying greatly hence thorough legal consideration is preeminent.

Getting started with us is straightforward – simply click on the button below which would guide you towards finding out what your Pedestrian Accident case might potentially be worth. Let us help bring clarity during the unsettling times post-accident experience aiding decisive moves forward securing justice deserved duly under law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Davis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Davis

Areas of Practice in Davis

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving adept legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, providing adept legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Stumble Occurrences

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing expert legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Specializing in defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​